
Deleted member 17724
Banned
-
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2019
- Posts
- 2,899
Let's take another glimpse into the life of the modern-day married man:
$3500 would probably be too much, but I don't see the problem in giving an allowance (because that's what it would be) to someone who's taking care of the kids, taking care of the house, cooking for you and presumably letting you fuck her.
To me that'd be a sweet deal providing she's human shaped and human sized.
It's how things have worked for thousands of years. Men provided resources, women took care of kids and the house/hut/cave/whatever. If you'd rather go MSTOW, you know where they hang out.
If were a couple we share aleverything. I'm not fucking giving you money. You want something you talk to me. I want something I talk to you but if it's my money I can spend it how I please and the woman is lucky the husband isnt forcing her to get off her lazy ass and workIt's how things have worked for thousands of years. Men provided resources, women took care of kids and the house/hut/cave/whatever. If you'd rather go MSTOW, you know where they hang out.
I'd rather have her in the house and spending money on Amazon than going out for work 10 hours a day. If you think the dogpill is real, just wait till you hear about the coworkerpill. Besides, if she's working you'd have to pay someone to take care of the kid.the woman is lucky the husband isnt forcing her to get off her lazy ass and work
What could she possibly need more than 400 a month for. He pays all the bills. Buys the food.I'd rather have her in the house and spending money on Amazon than going out for work 10 hours a day. If you think the dogpill is real, just wait till you hear about the coworkerpill. Besides, if she's working you'd have to pay someone to take care of the kid.
Given that foids are legally allowed to do pretty much anything including divorce you, I think having her stay at home taking care of the kids is the ideal solution and if the price were reasonable I'd be happy to pay. If you feel she still has the time to stray, put some more kids into her until she doesn't.
Most females are self-entitled.
It's not a question of need but of her knowing what she can get if he decides he doesn't want to pay (good luck paying less than $3500/mo on alimony+child support). It's not the olden days any more, foids can do whatever they want now so if you can keep them happy inside the house and busy with the kids and housekeeping, it's by far the safest option.What could she possibly need more than 400 a month for. He pays all the bills. Buys the food.
That's how I used to think until I had to babysit my niece and nephew for an entire weekend. TV, tablets, consoles, VR and still I could barely keep it together.She turns the TV on for the kids then zones out on xanax all day
The alternative is to tell them tough shit go get a job.It's not a question of need but of her knowing what she can get if he decides he doesn't want to pay (good luck paying less than $3500/mo on alimony+child support). It's not the olden days any more, foids can do whatever they want now so if you can keep them happy inside the house and busy with the kids and housekeeping, it's by far the safest option.
That's how I used to think until I had to babysit my niece and nephew for an entire weekend. TV, tablets, consoles, VR and still I could barely keep it together.
If a foid:
then I'll happily pay her allowance. Not $3500/mo but $1500 sure. It's only money and its very purpose is to exchange it for things you value. Does it suck that wives now won't just do their jobs and shut up? Sure, but what's the alternative?
- is willing to have kids with me (judges my DNA to be good enough to combine with hers, the ultimate compliment and validation)
- keeps those kids alive, clean and in good health
- cleans the house, does laundry, cooks, shops for groceries
- has sex with me
- doesn't have time to go out and fuck Chad
She already got an allowance of 150 which seems high enough to me, unless the guy's a millionaire which I doubt.$3500 would probably be too much, but I don't see the problem in giving an allowance (because that's what it would be) to someone who's taking care of the kids, taking care of the house, cooking for you and presumably letting you fuck her.
To me that'd be a sweet deal providing she's human shaped and human sized.
And by the end of the week she's fucking Chad at work, letting him nut in her mouth and then comes home and kisses your kids.The alternative is to tell them tough shit go get a job.
Yeah, because as the man it's your job to provide for your family. Of course if you're a modern progressive dude and believe in gender equality and don't like established gender roles, then you might expect her to do the man's job.If you were in her position shed laugh at you and tell you to man up.
What would you say is the purpose of having a family? And what would be the parameter for success? And how much money would that be worth to you? There's nothing bluepilled about doing a thing that's time tested and works: you provide, she nurtures. If you value your money more than you value having a family, then don't get married in the first place (assuming you'd have a choice).This is insanely bluepilled
Let's take another glimpse into the life of the modern-day married man:
I'd rather have her in the house and spending money on Amazon than going out for work 10 hours a day. If you think the dogpill is real, just wait till you hear about the coworkerpill. Besides, if she's working you'd have to pay someone to take care of the kid.
Given that foids are legally allowed to do pretty much anything including divorce you, I think having her stay at home taking care of the kids is the ideal solution and if the price were reasonable I'd be happy to pay. If you feel she still has the time to stray, put some more kids into her until she doesn't.
You realise that she could also be fucking guys while she's out "shopping"? Women buy crap they don't need as a social activity with their friends so she wouldn't be statisfied by just ordering it online.I'd rather have her in the house and spending money on Amazon than going out for work 10 hours a day. If you think the dogpill is real, just wait till you hear about the coworkerpill. Besides, if she's working you'd have to pay someone to take care of the kid.
Given that foids are legally allowed to do pretty much anything including divorce you, I think having her stay at home taking care of the kids is the ideal solution and if the price were reasonable I'd be happy to pay. If you feel she still has the time to stray, put some more kids into her until she doesn't.
Getting paid for existing is even better. Wait. Thats NEETbux.TFW Just Exist Mode is still too hard.
All foids care about is being able to show off in their social circles and getting attention which is clearly the main objective in this woman's obsession with buying useless shit. Her husband and child are probably tools she uses to get attention as well. Once the attention she gets from being a housewife and mother runs out, she'll get divorced so the spotlight will be on her again.Foids are weird with this. They take shit like having a roof over their head and food to eat for granted.
Of course, but it's far less likely she'll stray if her life is tied to the house and taking care of kids than if she's out for work 50 hours a week. She won't be fucking Chad 60 seconds after he twitches his eyebrows at her in Costco. Sure she'd like to, but she's carrying four bags and the ice cream is melting and one of her kids is shitting himself and the other is trying to commit suicide by escalator and that's her life. If she still has the time to stray, put another kid in her.You realise that she could also be fucking guys while she's out "shopping"? Women buy crap they don't need as a social activity with their friends so she wouldn't be statisfied by just ordering it online.
Just to be clear: I completely agree with you that married women should not be working and that husbands of working women are very likely to get cucked by her coworkers. If I had a wife, I'd never let her have a job. But I don't think letting her go out everyday and go shopping is much of an alternative. She said in her post that she's going out with her friends so I doubt she's bringing her children along. The only good option would be her just staying at home all day and taking care of household chores and the children and only going out to shop together with her husband.Of course, but it's far less likely she'll stray if her life is tied to the house and taking care of kids than if she's out for work 50 hours a week. She won't be fucking Chad 60 seconds after he twitches his eyebrows at her in Costco. Sure she'd like to, but she's carrying four bags and the ice cream is melting and one of her kids is shitting himself and the other is trying to commit suicide by escalator and that's her life. If she still has the time to stray, put another kid in her.
Or tell her to get a job and hope she remains faithful while spending 200 hours a month around better looking guys.
The majority of marriages in the modern-day west are like this, sadly.Why would you get married if you want to become financially independent? All she has to do is make the jump from wanting $3,500/mo to wanting everything in a divorce and his life plans are ruined. The resentment in that post is palpable, the marriage is clearly on borrowed time.
CopeTo me that'd be a sweet deal providing she's human shaped and human sized.