PM_ME_STRIPPERS
IYAIYAI
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 15,813
The reason women control this sexual market is because men, even chads, have little to no standards AND many women could care less about sex and go on with their lives perfectly content without having it ( Yes women still love sex but women arent genetically wired like men to want to fuck/ have gf 24/7).
My first point, men have no standards. If better looking men focused on getting with women who are on par with them in looks, the worse looking men would have a shot with the worse looking women. At the moment, women who are "ugly" or "fat" can often get men who are pretty good looking and in shape simply due to the fact men are extremely thirsty.
Women know they have this benefit and take full advantage of it. If we take away this power from them, then in theory, they will have to seek men who are on par with them in looks. The reason why I said this works in theory feeds into my second point. Women can be perfectly content with not having sex their entire lives. Many women have the mentality that they're hot shit due to the thirst of males.
You'll see unattractive or fat girls get tons of matches on tinder or many likes on a Facebook profile picture. Society is constantly validating women, even the ugly fat ones, so they get a sense of "high standards" and will not settle for a man under a 7/10. This is why, even if we fix the problem of men being extremely thirsty, it's not guaranteed women will get with incels. Because they already have a sense of superiority and feel entitled to men who are above them in looks.
I also don't believe women are as thirsty as men so if we fix the market place and only ugly men approached ugly women and no one else, women would still not have casual sex. Fixing the SMV of incels is a major step for a more equal hook-up/ relationship culture.
My first point, men have no standards. If better looking men focused on getting with women who are on par with them in looks, the worse looking men would have a shot with the worse looking women. At the moment, women who are "ugly" or "fat" can often get men who are pretty good looking and in shape simply due to the fact men are extremely thirsty.
Women know they have this benefit and take full advantage of it. If we take away this power from them, then in theory, they will have to seek men who are on par with them in looks. The reason why I said this works in theory feeds into my second point. Women can be perfectly content with not having sex their entire lives. Many women have the mentality that they're hot shit due to the thirst of males.
You'll see unattractive or fat girls get tons of matches on tinder or many likes on a Facebook profile picture. Society is constantly validating women, even the ugly fat ones, so they get a sense of "high standards" and will not settle for a man under a 7/10. This is why, even if we fix the problem of men being extremely thirsty, it's not guaranteed women will get with incels. Because they already have a sense of superiority and feel entitled to men who are above them in looks.
I also don't believe women are as thirsty as men so if we fix the market place and only ugly men approached ugly women and no one else, women would still not have casual sex. Fixing the SMV of incels is a major step for a more equal hook-up/ relationship culture.
Last edited: