Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Why whoredom/"freedom" doesn't help and why there is no contradiction between "Women are whores and only fuck chads"

L

Lebensmüder

Autistcel, >20: no date, no kiss, no holding hands
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Posts
4,570
Online
158d 1h 22m
There is no contradiction about that (contrary to what journos/redditors say). Women are sex-positive when it comes to attractive men; they act like nymphomaniacs around attractive men and can barely hold themselves back (truly eyefucking him and nearly melting in his presence), for them they are cumsluts or whatever degenerate word they use, meanwhile they behave like asexual nuns and want to be treated as a saint by the rest, if they even make eye contact with her she feels violated.

When love is "free" (from social pressure/financial pressure) only chad gets it. Women would willingly only associate with absolute A-class of men in terms of looks/neurotypicality; the rest was only barely tolerated due to being indispensible for the own welfare in the past (with their newfound freedom they can just nowadays openly say how much they hate average/below average men, "Kill all men" means "Kill all subchads").
The truth is: Women wouldn't even want these men to exist. In the past they were seen as a necessary evil and now that so(y)ciety has finally made men obsolete they are getting rid off them.

When you remove certain factors (like money/jobs) from the competition, the influence of other factors (like looks/neurotypicality/etc.) only increases. The game remains the same with other axiomes being used as a metric to quantify your worth.
Women would never have associated with these men unless forced, the lie is that people have common interests, this is not the case, the interests of non-chad-males and women/chads are mutually exclusive, the luck of one is the bad luck of the other - and these people don't care for our luck - so why should we care for theirs? Power and the ability to dictate what people do is everything that matters, when you deny yourself that don't think that others will do the same for you, when you say that there is a bareer you aren't willing to cross you invite others to cross it because in that moment you say that you will give up as soon as that happens.

The greatest lie is that freedom is universal; in a completely free economy monopolies would arise, which would (by deliberately avoiding to provide essential services) force people to do/pay whatever they want (effectively destroying their freedom indirectly), they never have to put you into jail or hurt you directly, they simply can choose not to act (thereby using their "freedom" not do something), the same thing happens with social freedom only that it knows only popularity/looks/neurotypicality/etc.
The greatest restriction of your own freedom is the freedom of others. When all laws in a field get removed only the A-class in a given system truly has freedom while the rest is commanded around (the same thing why anarchy is a joke, stratification is the only state humanity knows and just new criteria for it would arise in a "free" society). Therefore restrictions of freedom must be made to preserve the freedom of all people and prevent a completely dichotomous stratificaction of society into losers/slaves and winners/masters (which we nowadays see), which was in the past done via monogamy where both men and women gave up parts of their respective freedom in a contract (a restrictive society gives an average man a place to belong, nobody would willingly associate with him unless forced in that way, it creates grey in a world that would be under complete freedom black and white, it's like taxes and social welfare, the necessary redistribution of ressources to preserve social peace and enable prosperity of all, because why should people willingly accept their lot in life and not rebell when they have nothing to lose and everything to gain).

Whoredom means that women associate freely with men and can choose whatever they like - and this is only chad, which means that a single chad has multiple partners while the rest has absolutely none. In a sexually repressive so(y)ciety it would be easier getting laid for the average/below average man.
journos/redditors - there is no contradiction between women being whores and women fucking only chads, women are whores for chads, prudes for average normalfags (that's why dead bedrooms are a thing) and asexual/holy nuns for the below average males that shouldn't even be allowed to make eye contact with them. Our ideology is entirely coherent.
 
Last edited:
-BrettyBoy-

-BrettyBoy-

Locally undesired.
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 14, 2019
Posts
13,158
Online
167d 15h 15m
Sluts need to be kept in check.
 
Lv99_BixNood

Lv99_BixNood

fascel
★★★
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Posts
5,255
Online
118d 20h 39m
Lebensmüder said:
The greatest restriction of your own freedom is the freedom of others.
Brutal, but true.
 
WØLF

WØLF

I CAN'T BREED
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Posts
27,760
Online
210d 6h 58m


Wow. This is literally the best explanation of female nature, AWALT, chad only/sub 8 theory (even though these ones are kinda just memes and greatly exaggerated tbh), genetic determinism, and the modern dating market I've seen so far

SergeantIncel @SergeantIncel
Master @Master
mental_out @mental_out
knajjd @knajjd
i_a_m_i @i_a_m_i
cocksucker @cocksucker
GoffSystemQB @GoffSystemQB
WithoutMe @WithoutMe
retarded_dumbshit @retarded_dumbshit
Ryo_Hazuki @Ryo_Hazuki
blickpall @blickpall
D @LittleBoy

Pin this thread and put it in must read content pls. People need to see this
 
L

Lebensmüder

Autistcel, >20: no date, no kiss, no holding hands
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Posts
4,570
Online
158d 1h 22m
WØLF said:


Wow. This is literally the best explanation of female nature, AWALT, chad only/sub 8 theory (even though these ones are kinda just memes and greatly exaggerated tbh), genetic determinism, and the modern dating market I've seen so far

SergeantIncel @SergeantIncel
Master @Master
mental_out @mental_out
knajjd @knajjd
i_a_m_i @i_a_m_i
cocksucker @cocksucker
GoffSystemQB @GoffSystemQB
WithoutMe @WithoutMe
retarded_dumbshit @retarded_dumbshit
Ryo_Hazuki @Ryo_Hazuki
blickpall @blickpall
D @LittleBoy

Pin this thread and put it in must read content pls. People need to see this
Thank you!
 
Mentally lost cel

Mentally lost cel

Overlord
Joined
Jul 5, 2020
Posts
5,020
Online
29d 6h 47m
High iq and fun read
 
lonelycurry26

lonelycurry26

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Apr 15, 2021
Posts
807
Online
24d 5h 39m
Das passiert halt, wenn man Frauen finanziell unabhängig macht und sie versorgt. Der unattraktive Mann verliert seinen Wert als Provider. Das einzige was Frauen wollen (aufgrund ihrer Biologie) ist sowieso Chad, aber damals ohne Rechte und in einer Gesellschaft, die gegen degeneratives Verhalten war, konnten sie es nicht so leicht ausleben. Damals hat man unattraktiven Männern auch gesagt "Arbeite hart und schaff was, sonst wird dich später keine Frau heiraten". Das gab dann Männern ein Grund irgendwas zu werden.

In der Gesellschaft jetzt sind Männer absolut obsolet geworden. Frauen sehen keinen Grund irgendwas mit solchen Typen zutun zu haben, außer wenn es keine andere Möglichkeit gibt und der Kerl eine gute Geldquelle zur eigenen Absicherung ist.

Wir, unattraltiven Männer, können nur verlieren.
 
L

Lebensmüder

Autistcel, >20: no date, no kiss, no holding hands
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Posts
4,570
Online
158d 1h 22m
lonelycurry26 said:
Das passiert halt, wenn man Frauen finanziell unabhängig macht und sie versorgt. Der unattraktive Mann verliert seinen Wert als Provider. Das einzige was Frauen wollen (aufgrund ihrer Biologie) ist sowieso Chad, aber damals ohne Rechte und in einer Gesellschaft, die gegen degeneratives Verhalten war, konnten sie es nicht so leicht ausleben. Damals hat man unattraktiven Männern auch gesagt "Arbeite hart und schaff was, sonst wird dich später keine Frau heiraten". Das gab dann Männern ein Grund irgendwas zu werden.

In der Gesellschaft jetzt sind Männer absolut obsolet geworden. Frauen sehen keinen Grund irgendwas mit solchen Typen zutun zu haben, außer wenn es keine andere Möglichkeit gibt und der Kerl eine gute Geldquelle zur eigenen Absicherung ist.

Wir, unattraltiven Männer, können nur verlieren.
Und dann ergeben sich so lustige Konstellationen, wo plötzlich der NEET mit hübschem Gesicht von einer STEM-gemaxxten Becky durchgefüttert wird, die ihr Looksmatch (, welches ferner finanziell kompatibler wäre) nicht mal mit dem Arsch anschauen würde. Diese völlig dystopische Drecksgesellschaft, beinahe lachhaft. Und dann kommt der Boomer-Vater und nennt einen, weil man heute kein GF hat, einen Verlierer und sagt, "Warum?", obgleich man doch STEMmaxxed ist (völlig ohne Berücksichtigung der neuen Dating-"Kultur" und des Arbeitsmarkts). Boomer einfach ebenfalls niederste Lebensformen. Und Spucke über die Köpfe aller Männer, die sich für diese Scheiße auch noch aufopfern und PUA-Müll regurgitieren. Dieses gönnerhafte Rumgehabe ist mitunter das Imperinenteste, was der Dreck da hervorbringt. "Ich ficke einen Landwal, schau wie beineidenswert ich bin" - lachhaftes Geschmeiß. Solidarität unter Männern ist heute ebenfalls ein Witz, wenn man einen Cent mehr hat, ist man reich und privilegiert, wenn man einen weniger hat quasi ein unwerter Penner - und gönnen tun sie immer, bis man es mal hat. Immer dieser herablassende Ratschlag, der auf einen hinabprasselt. "Es ist so einfach, Bro, weiß ich auch als 2m-Kerl mit dezentem Gesicht" - geisteskranke Selbstverleugnung im Sinne von Underrating von Männern und dabei Overrating von Frauen.
 
Last edited:
FIVETHREEBALDCEL

FIVETHREEBALDCEL

Master of Personality
★★
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Posts
659
Online
7d 9h 25m
Quality content good read
 
D

Deleted member 6329

A face that can cure nymphomania
-
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
4,697
Online
20d 10h 35m
In conclusion, the sex revolution was a mistake.
 
Shigechi

Shigechi

Feminists are just clump of cells
★★★
Joined
Jun 16, 2019
Posts
5,223
Online
202d 12h 28m
High IQ. Should be pinned.
 
highinhibition

highinhibition

Admiral
★★
Joined
Jul 2, 2021
Posts
2,642
Online
26d 21h 40m
Beating women is always in their best interest

 
Robtical

Robtical

Had it with these cucks
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Posts
29,807
Online
364d 9h 47m
Anarchy is the best system for non chads because there won't be a big government to enforce cucked laws and redistribute our tax money to chad chasing whores.
 
Nemesis

Nemesis

Sick of n0rmies, norwood cell
★★★★
Joined
Aug 7, 2021
Posts
343
Online
2d 16h 6m
highinhibition said:
Beating women is always in their best interest

View attachment 477893
Based. Punch a dirty slut with a roman salute!


Well writet
Lebensmüder said:
journos/redditors - there is no contradiction between women being whores and women fucking only chads, women are whores for chads, prudes for average normalfags (that's why dead bedrooms are a thing) and asexual/holy nuns for the below average males that shouldn't even be allowed to make eye contact with them. Our ideology is entirely coherent.
true af
 
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top