
dragonbro
Banned
-
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2019
- Posts
- 463
Among a lot of MRAs, there is a sentiment that the courts are overly harsh on men who miss childcare payments. They also suggest the idea of "financial abortion" where a biological father resigns his financial duty to his offspring in return for cutting off his involvement with the child.
Both of these ideas are extremely cucked from an incel standpoint. These MRAs are misguided by thinking that loosening restrictions on men in the same way they were loosened on women by feminism would improve the lot of men.
In reality, these proposals would only force incels to pay more in taxes to raise the offspring of their competition.
I am GLAD that men go to jail because they can't pay childcare. A lot of these men are having 5+ children with multiple women.
Yes, it costs the state a lot to hold a main in jail. But how much productivity is lost when men can't find wives and the state chokes them with exorbitant taxes?
You get what you incentivize. These MRA policies would have a long range devastating effect for society.
Both of these ideas are extremely cucked from an incel standpoint. These MRAs are misguided by thinking that loosening restrictions on men in the same way they were loosened on women by feminism would improve the lot of men.
In reality, these proposals would only force incels to pay more in taxes to raise the offspring of their competition.
I am GLAD that men go to jail because they can't pay childcare. A lot of these men are having 5+ children with multiple women.
Yes, it costs the state a lot to hold a main in jail. But how much productivity is lost when men can't find wives and the state chokes them with exorbitant taxes?
You get what you incentivize. These MRA policies would have a long range devastating effect for society.