N
I came accross this interesting interaction on reddit and the little argument they had got me thinking :
The reaction of the downvoted clearly shows something we commonly see in feminist spaces when it comes to porn and sex work : basically the real definition of rape isnt when a woman doesn't want to have sex and is forced to have sex with a man, but rather, the REAL definition of rape is when an unattractive man somehow succeeds to have sex with a woman that shouldnt be attracted to him.
This explains exactly why a chad rapist cant exist : since the foid is a priori attracted to him, the sex CANNOT be non consensual, and therefore it CANNOT be rape. On the opposite, if a non chad man PAYS to have CONSENSUAL transactional sex with a woman, according to a lot of feminists (aka all foids) it is STIL RAPE because the woman CANNOT consent despite her open admission of consent. To a lot of feminists, any sexual relationship between a non chad and a foid is, deep foen, always rape. They are convinced the woman has either been groomed, deceived, forced or payed. They are chad supremacism activists and wish to "punish" any non chad for having sex and "tricking" a foid into fucking him.
Basically feminists are ACTIVE militants for the BLACKPILL.
Thats why, on my end, I advocate for rape. As sex workers show, as long as a woman is paid, she's OK to accept fucking with an ugly man and, therefore proves women can oerfectly accept to fuck with ugly guys without crying RAPE and trauma. I think this should be considered very seriously.
The reaction of the downvoted clearly shows something we commonly see in feminist spaces when it comes to porn and sex work : basically the real definition of rape isnt when a woman doesn't want to have sex and is forced to have sex with a man, but rather, the REAL definition of rape is when an unattractive man somehow succeeds to have sex with a woman that shouldnt be attracted to him.
This explains exactly why a chad rapist cant exist : since the foid is a priori attracted to him, the sex CANNOT be non consensual, and therefore it CANNOT be rape. On the opposite, if a non chad man PAYS to have CONSENSUAL transactional sex with a woman, according to a lot of feminists (aka all foids) it is STIL RAPE because the woman CANNOT consent despite her open admission of consent. To a lot of feminists, any sexual relationship between a non chad and a foid is, deep foen, always rape. They are convinced the woman has either been groomed, deceived, forced or payed. They are chad supremacism activists and wish to "punish" any non chad for having sex and "tricking" a foid into fucking him.
Basically feminists are ACTIVE militants for the BLACKPILL.
Thats why, on my end, I advocate for rape. As sex workers show, as long as a woman is paid, she's OK to accept fucking with an ugly man and, therefore proves women can oerfectly accept to fuck with ugly guys without crying RAPE and trauma. I think this should be considered very seriously.
