U
It all has to do with alpha fux beta bux. Older men tend to have access to more resources than younger men. Women don't compete against one another for sex, but access to men's resources. This is why you'll hear many women say that emotional infidelity is worse than sexual infidelity. Because emotional infidelity to a foid represents the potential loss of a man's resources to another woman. Since a man will invest his resources in a woman he is emotionally attached to, but he can just have sex with any woman.
Men are more concerned with sexual infidelity in their partners. Women cannot use brute strength to bend men to their will. But women excel at manipulation, language manipulation being among them.
The only thing a woman has to compete against other women is her physical beauty and looks, which serve as a proxy for her fertility. These decline with age. This puts older women at a disadvantage to younger women when it comes to securing resources. All else being equal, most men will always choose the 16 year old over the 36 year old and in turn will choose the 36 year old over the 56 year old.
So in order to keep their advantage, older women use manipulation tactics.
A. They make it a moral issue. If you're a 32 year old man, it is immoral for you to even find a 16 year old girl attractive. In fact, it is even immoral for you to find a 21 year old attractive, even if it is legal.
B. They manipulate language. This is a big one. Knowing that most people have almost an instinctive reaction against someone who wants to have sex with children, they redefine what a child is. When I say the word child, what do you think of? A picture of a 4 year old pre schooler would pop into most peoples mind. And many people would get outraged at the thought of a grown man prowling around a playground trying to lure a 4 year old child into a sexual relationship. So they then redefine "child" to mean a fully developed 16 or 17 year old Stacy in skin tight yoga pants. And no one wants to have sex with a child, right? By repeating something often enough and never having anyone challenge it, it can become accepted as fact.
The reality is that 16 year old Stacy is not a child, but a young woman who is more similar in every way to a 25 year old than a 10 year old.
C. Where there is no victim, there is no crime. So older women automatically make younger women rape victims whenever they are involved with older men. There was a case in Illinois of a 32 year old man who was having sex with his 17 year old girlfriend. 17 is the age of consent in Illinois, but society hates it when a man does anything that goes against the female mating strategy. As far as society is concerned, he should only have sex with women his age or older. So if he was having sex with a woman who was 47, 15 years older than him, no one would care. But since it was a prime 17 year old, he had to be punished for "raping" this girl. How did they get him? Well, a few times when they were having sex, he recorded it. Since the girlfriend was 17 and hence defined as a "child", they convicted him of producing "child pornography". The case went to the Illinois Supreme Court. Two of the justices sided with him, but the other 3 cucked justices ruled against him. He received 15 years in prison.
Older women automatically define all sexual interactions between older men and prime aged women as rape or at the very least, as her being taken advantage of. This is so that they can justify it as immoral and thus there needing to be laws against it.
Imagine if all sexual interactions between black men and white women were automatically defined as rape? As if there's no situation that could ever exist where a sexual interaction between a black man and white woman could NOT be rape or her being "taken advantage of".
D. Older women claim that younger women aren't ready for sex emotionally. But they are a ok with a 16 year old getting gangbanged, doing BDSM, anal and any sex act under the sun with 16 year old Chads and 16 year old Tyrones. And that's just healthy sexual exploration. They are ok with her dressing like a hooker and wearing thongs and g strings. Yet will claim that she is somehow irrevocably damaged if she even holds hands with a 30 year old man. Of course they can never explain how or why this works. And their is no science to back it up.
Why? Because 16 year old Chads and Tyrones don't control the resources that older women are after. Men their own age do. So a 16 year old Stacy having sex with 16 year old Chad is no threat to the 36 year old woman who wants her beta bux. She has effectively removed 16 year old Stacy as an option for good looking and/or high status men her age. Leaving herself as the only option. This also explains why younger women never get upset about young men their age having sex with an older woman. A 16 year old girl can care less if a 16 year old young man has sex with a 30 year old woman. But a 30 year old woman will seethe at the thought of a man her age having sex with a 16 year old girl. That represents a potential loss of resources to the older woman.
E. Without social constraints, men would expend more resources on prime aged women. Men would still sleep with same aged women, but given the option, they will invest more resources, financial and emotional, into prime aged girls. This would leave less for older women as they would have no way to compete.
Men are more concerned with sexual infidelity in their partners. Women cannot use brute strength to bend men to their will. But women excel at manipulation, language manipulation being among them.
The only thing a woman has to compete against other women is her physical beauty and looks, which serve as a proxy for her fertility. These decline with age. This puts older women at a disadvantage to younger women when it comes to securing resources. All else being equal, most men will always choose the 16 year old over the 36 year old and in turn will choose the 36 year old over the 56 year old.
So in order to keep their advantage, older women use manipulation tactics.
A. They make it a moral issue. If you're a 32 year old man, it is immoral for you to even find a 16 year old girl attractive. In fact, it is even immoral for you to find a 21 year old attractive, even if it is legal.
B. They manipulate language. This is a big one. Knowing that most people have almost an instinctive reaction against someone who wants to have sex with children, they redefine what a child is. When I say the word child, what do you think of? A picture of a 4 year old pre schooler would pop into most peoples mind. And many people would get outraged at the thought of a grown man prowling around a playground trying to lure a 4 year old child into a sexual relationship. So they then redefine "child" to mean a fully developed 16 or 17 year old Stacy in skin tight yoga pants. And no one wants to have sex with a child, right? By repeating something often enough and never having anyone challenge it, it can become accepted as fact.
The reality is that 16 year old Stacy is not a child, but a young woman who is more similar in every way to a 25 year old than a 10 year old.
C. Where there is no victim, there is no crime. So older women automatically make younger women rape victims whenever they are involved with older men. There was a case in Illinois of a 32 year old man who was having sex with his 17 year old girlfriend. 17 is the age of consent in Illinois, but society hates it when a man does anything that goes against the female mating strategy. As far as society is concerned, he should only have sex with women his age or older. So if he was having sex with a woman who was 47, 15 years older than him, no one would care. But since it was a prime 17 year old, he had to be punished for "raping" this girl. How did they get him? Well, a few times when they were having sex, he recorded it. Since the girlfriend was 17 and hence defined as a "child", they convicted him of producing "child pornography". The case went to the Illinois Supreme Court. Two of the justices sided with him, but the other 3 cucked justices ruled against him. He received 15 years in prison.
Older women automatically define all sexual interactions between older men and prime aged women as rape or at the very least, as her being taken advantage of. This is so that they can justify it as immoral and thus there needing to be laws against it.
Imagine if all sexual interactions between black men and white women were automatically defined as rape? As if there's no situation that could ever exist where a sexual interaction between a black man and white woman could NOT be rape or her being "taken advantage of".
D. Older women claim that younger women aren't ready for sex emotionally. But they are a ok with a 16 year old getting gangbanged, doing BDSM, anal and any sex act under the sun with 16 year old Chads and 16 year old Tyrones. And that's just healthy sexual exploration. They are ok with her dressing like a hooker and wearing thongs and g strings. Yet will claim that she is somehow irrevocably damaged if she even holds hands with a 30 year old man. Of course they can never explain how or why this works. And their is no science to back it up.
Why? Because 16 year old Chads and Tyrones don't control the resources that older women are after. Men their own age do. So a 16 year old Stacy having sex with 16 year old Chad is no threat to the 36 year old woman who wants her beta bux. She has effectively removed 16 year old Stacy as an option for good looking and/or high status men her age. Leaving herself as the only option. This also explains why younger women never get upset about young men their age having sex with an older woman. A 16 year old girl can care less if a 16 year old young man has sex with a 30 year old woman. But a 30 year old woman will seethe at the thought of a man her age having sex with a 16 year old girl. That represents a potential loss of resources to the older woman.
E. Without social constraints, men would expend more resources on prime aged women. Men would still sleep with same aged women, but given the option, they will invest more resources, financial and emotional, into prime aged girls. This would leave less for older women as they would have no way to compete.
old foids are prime kekfuel 
