R
When it comes to women's harsh genetic cutoffs and filters, it is likely factually correct that NAWALT. If you look at any distribution there are always outliers. The simplest way to look at this is in the matter of height.
94% of women admit they will avoid dating a man if he is "too short". But their cutoffs vary. And some (6%) truly claim not to care. They are likely liars, but still statistically it is probably true there is some minority of women that doesn't care.
So let's say you're 5'4" as a man. You've been rejected over and over for your height. You're upset about it. Then someone tells you "NAWALT! You'll find someone if you keep trying!"
Well sort of.
Let's take the data and assume it's correct. This data was reviewed previously here and it is now also in the scientific blackpill.
At 5'4", 90% of women will openly reject you for your height.
So that still leaves 10% of women who might consider you. Is "NAWALT" hope?
Well the problem is those 10% of women who might consider you will also consider a man who is taller.
So actually, the NAWALT women who can accept a short man (if we can presume they exist) have an even BIGGER dating pool to choose from than any other women. This means the competition to get one is insane. You are basically competing against ALL MEN because this NAWALT women has opened her filters wider.
The competition ends up looking like this:
So at 5'4" you are competing against 8 other men for any of those 10% girls who will accept you, and most of the guys you are competing against are bigger than you.
So even if a girl truly does not care about whether a guy is 5'4" or not, statistically speaking, most of the time she will still end up dating a taller man. In order to "win" and get one of those 10% women, you'd still have to be better than the other 8 guys you're up against for her to choose you. And of course that's hard when you're 5'4".
So while statistically speaking, it is likely true that NAWALT, it won't really help you very much. The same will be true for every other parameter.
- If a girl doesn't care about race, you are then competing against men of all races for her.
- If a girl doesn't care about your jawline, you are then competing against every man with a shitty jaw (plus the ones with good jaws).
etc.
The main problem with women is that they don't fetishize men's quirks in any positive ways. Eg. Some men love tall women. Some men love short women. Some men love big tits. Some men love small tits. We can appreciate the variety of women's appearances.
But there are no women who actively love short men, etc. At best they can "tolerate" short men.
So is it likely true that "NAWALT"? Maybe sort of. Will it help you? Probably not. A "NAWALT" just has an even bigger dating pool than any other woman and will still likely pick the best candidate (ie. Some guy that looks a lot like Chad).
94% of women admit they will avoid dating a man if he is "too short". But their cutoffs vary. And some (6%) truly claim not to care. They are likely liars, but still statistically it is probably true there is some minority of women that doesn't care.
So let's say you're 5'4" as a man. You've been rejected over and over for your height. You're upset about it. Then someone tells you "NAWALT! You'll find someone if you keep trying!"
Well sort of.
Let's take the data and assume it's correct. This data was reviewed previously here and it is now also in the scientific blackpill.
At 5'4", 90% of women will openly reject you for your height.
So that still leaves 10% of women who might consider you. Is "NAWALT" hope?
Well the problem is those 10% of women who might consider you will also consider a man who is taller.
So actually, the NAWALT women who can accept a short man (if we can presume they exist) have an even BIGGER dating pool to choose from than any other women. This means the competition to get one is insane. You are basically competing against ALL MEN because this NAWALT women has opened her filters wider.
The competition ends up looking like this:
So at 5'4" you are competing against 8 other men for any of those 10% girls who will accept you, and most of the guys you are competing against are bigger than you.
So even if a girl truly does not care about whether a guy is 5'4" or not, statistically speaking, most of the time she will still end up dating a taller man. In order to "win" and get one of those 10% women, you'd still have to be better than the other 8 guys you're up against for her to choose you. And of course that's hard when you're 5'4".
So while statistically speaking, it is likely true that NAWALT, it won't really help you very much. The same will be true for every other parameter.
- If a girl doesn't care about race, you are then competing against men of all races for her.
- If a girl doesn't care about your jawline, you are then competing against every man with a shitty jaw (plus the ones with good jaws).
etc.
The main problem with women is that they don't fetishize men's quirks in any positive ways. Eg. Some men love tall women. Some men love short women. Some men love big tits. Some men love small tits. We can appreciate the variety of women's appearances.
But there are no women who actively love short men, etc. At best they can "tolerate" short men.
So is it likely true that "NAWALT"? Maybe sort of. Will it help you? Probably not. A "NAWALT" just has an even bigger dating pool than any other woman and will still likely pick the best candidate (ie. Some guy that looks a lot like Chad).
