The report presents the largest survey of self-identified incels to date, including 561 individuals who are residents of the U.K. or United States and over the age of 18. It found that more than a third of participants met the criteria for moderate depression (39 per cent) and anxiety (43 per cent), along with high levels of loneliness and anger. Furthermore, the report found 30 per cent of surveyed incels met clinical requirements for referrals for autism assessment, but not explicitly a diagnosis.
While the report warns against drawing causality between autism and terrorism, a focus on this finding could contribute to a stigmatizing claim that incels have a higher rate and likelihood of being diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.
Some news media have cited the report, emphasizing that
incels are 30 times more likely to be autistic than the general population. Although the original report offers rich data on incel populations, its findings may be misused to reinforce harmful narratives against people with autism. This may lead to stigmatizing and false claims that autistic people are predisposed to violence, radicalization or hateful ideologies due to their diagnosis.
Many people with autism see it as an integral and
positive part of their identities, rather than an illness to be cured. Casting autism as a mental disorder that leads to violence reinforces ableist narratives about autistic individuals as more likely to commit crimes when they are generally
more likely to be victims than perpetrators of crime.
A balancing act
How can we balance sympathy towards individuals battling mental health challenges while also holding violent actors accountable?
Mental health resources for individuals in incel spaces are crucial to prevent violence.
One study indicated that social isolation can exacerbate negative feelings that lead individuals to join incel communities seeking a sense of belonging.
The U.K. study rightly concludes that interventions addressing the incel community’s mental health requires an effective harm reduction strategy. However, drivers of poor mental health must be evaluated beyond individual-level factors such as autism or mental health diagnoses.
Addressing incel violence requires a more fluid and collaborative understanding of public health and counter-terrorism approaches to dealing with the issue. (Shutterstock)
We must also examine systemic factors for adverse mental health among those driven to join the incel community,
such as the role of technology and the internet in facilitating radicalization and lack of social support programs for people in vulnerable situations.
The U.K. report argues “
incels need mental health support rather than a counter-terrorism intervention.” While mental health support is crucial, solely adopting a public health approach in replacement of a comprehensive public safety and counter-terrorism perspective can be reductive.
It can characterize incels as
lone wolves in a way that ignores the organized nature of the incel community in promoting violence. Further, it dismisses ongoing efforts to understand
how gendered forms of violence can underpin radical ideology classified as extremism or terrorism. Public health initiatives and counter-terrorism should not be seen as trade-offs, but work hand-in-hand to identify threats of gendered ideological extremism and work towards mental health approaches to de-radicalization.
Addressing incel violence requires a more fluid and collaborative understanding of public health and counter-terrorism approaches to dealing with the issue. Greater attention must be paid to balancing accountability for violence and sympathy towards people who need mental health support.
If you are experiencing challenges with your mental health and well-being, we encourage you to seek help and resources. You may refer to
this repository of mental health services around the world.
theconversation.com
