I
In most social circles, women (single or otherwise) are at the center of importance in the circle, with their boyfriends being not too far behind. Single males are at the fringes of social circles. They are usually not wanted because the men in that circle see them as competition, and the women in that circle see them as a threat.
So why do men simp? To many men, being in the lowest part of a totem pole of a social group is better than being socially isolated. A lot of men would rather be sexless but have some level of social capital, than live on the fringes of society where you have like one or two friends, but you don't get invited to events, parties, etc. And honestly, it's quite easy to believe. Humans are a social species, and for a lot of men, it is a lot painful being socially isolated than being sexually frustrated.
Simps are low-value males. They are in the social circle to a certain extent, so long as they provide the circle with a material or emotional benefit (eg. A car for taking the girls to places, or be an emotional tampon for no reward). However, the condition to being accepted into that social circle is that they must appear completely asexual and must always agree with the opinions of the women in the group.
In a lot of women's perspective, they are the ones doing a favour to that male, and honestly that's not far from the truth. When a woman trusts one of these low-value men, they allow that man access to a social network that he would not have gotten otherwise. You always see this in how women react to receiving services from these men. They think that the man should be grateful that she is even giving him the chance to drive him to places or take her to a movie. She sees the cost of validating the low-value man to her social circle, is about as equal as the material/emotional benefit she is getting from him.
It is really not that much different to how Bonobos, the ape species most similar to us, organize their own social groups. In Bonobos, their social structure is matrifocal, meaning that it is the women in the group who decide who is allowed in the structure. Again, Bonobos are the closest primate to us, so how they organize is similar to how humans organize if we had no laws or culture, and pure freedom (as we do in the West, where there is no patriarchy).
This also explains why gay men tend to be higher up in many of these social circles; they're not a threat to the women because of their orientation, nor are they a competition for the boyfriends.
If lucky, some simps can get to the same level of importance, but very rarely. You can often tell guys like this. He seems to hang out with women all the time but when you talk to him in person he has actually been single the whole time. It seems like he's a player, but in reality he's just the most useful simp of the group, so he gets special privileges and the women might ask for his opinions on stuff.
All of that demolishes though the second the simp demonstrates that he has a sexuality of his own.
So why do men simp? To many men, being in the lowest part of a totem pole of a social group is better than being socially isolated. A lot of men would rather be sexless but have some level of social capital, than live on the fringes of society where you have like one or two friends, but you don't get invited to events, parties, etc. And honestly, it's quite easy to believe. Humans are a social species, and for a lot of men, it is a lot painful being socially isolated than being sexually frustrated.
Simps are low-value males. They are in the social circle to a certain extent, so long as they provide the circle with a material or emotional benefit (eg. A car for taking the girls to places, or be an emotional tampon for no reward). However, the condition to being accepted into that social circle is that they must appear completely asexual and must always agree with the opinions of the women in the group.
In a lot of women's perspective, they are the ones doing a favour to that male, and honestly that's not far from the truth. When a woman trusts one of these low-value men, they allow that man access to a social network that he would not have gotten otherwise. You always see this in how women react to receiving services from these men. They think that the man should be grateful that she is even giving him the chance to drive him to places or take her to a movie. She sees the cost of validating the low-value man to her social circle, is about as equal as the material/emotional benefit she is getting from him.
It is really not that much different to how Bonobos, the ape species most similar to us, organize their own social groups. In Bonobos, their social structure is matrifocal, meaning that it is the women in the group who decide who is allowed in the structure. Again, Bonobos are the closest primate to us, so how they organize is similar to how humans organize if we had no laws or culture, and pure freedom (as we do in the West, where there is no patriarchy).
This also explains why gay men tend to be higher up in many of these social circles; they're not a threat to the women because of their orientation, nor are they a competition for the boyfriends.
If lucky, some simps can get to the same level of importance, but very rarely. You can often tell guys like this. He seems to hang out with women all the time but when you talk to him in person he has actually been single the whole time. It seems like he's a player, but in reality he's just the most useful simp of the group, so he gets special privileges and the women might ask for his opinions on stuff.
All of that demolishes though the second the simp demonstrates that he has a sexuality of his own.
Last edited:
