Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Why Is There Such A Big Gap In Treatment Between a 3 Face and 4 Face

universallyabhorres

universallyabhorres

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Jan 30, 2025
Posts
821
Seriously, it's just one point yeah a 3 is noticeably unattractive but that doesn't make him a different species or a deformed freakshow. So why on earth are 3's treated so badly even 3.5's who are only 1/2 a point below. Someone between 3-4 cannot make friends, is excluded everywhere, unlikely to be hired for good jobs due to their looks, deals with discriminatory treatment in the workplace, gets stared at in public negatively with disgusted or contemptuous looks and can never get a gf. But someone who is a 4 experiences only little bits of lookism and despite being low status is still accepted in groups. How is this reasonable, thoughts? By the way most people considered ugly are between 3 and 4. There are very few 1's and 2's.
 
It's because at around that range, you fall from more "conventionally ugly" into more of an actual, "deformed" kind if that makes any sense
 
A 4 is very common and it is around average, while at a 3 or even 3.5 you are consistently going to be the ugliest person in a room and have at least one prominent facial flaw that puts other people off about your appearance.

A 3-4 rating is so rare in fact that I rarely see people near my looks level on even this forum.
 
A 4 is very common and it is around average, while at a 3 or even 3.5 you are consistently going to be the ugliest person in a room and have at least one prominent facial flaw that puts other people off about your appearance.

A 3-4 rating is so rare in fact that I rarely see people near my looks level on even this forum.
There are two reasons, I disagree.

The first is there's not that much of a difference in attractiveness between a 3.5 and 4.

Second it is not that uncommon like a deformed person, something like 5 or 10 percent of guys might be sub4. So yeah you might be the ugliest person in the room, but people are used to seeing at least one person at your level in a large room, so theoretically it shouldn't be as bad as a deformity, which is an extreme outlier.

I feel like a 3-4 should be tolerable based on these facts, more importantly there do exist other 3-4s including women at that level, yet they do not face the social difficulties and discrimination that men at that level do.

I do agree it's rare especially on this forum which is full of good looking guys.
 
There are two reasons, I disagree.

The first is there's not that much of a difference in attractiveness between a 3.5 and 4.

Second it is not that uncommon like a deformed person, something like 5 or 10 percent of guys might be sub4. So yeah you might be the ugliest person in the room, but people are used to seeing at least one person at your level in a large room, so theoretically it shouldn't be as bad as a deformity, which is an extreme outlier.

I feel like a 3-4 should be tolerable based on these facts, more importantly there do exist other 3-4s including women at that level, yet they do not face the social difficulties and discrimination that men at that level do.
Sub4 is when you have absolutely zero options because foids around your looks level are going to be getting with average looking guys and sub2 women are either extremely rare or also getting with average guys.

By deformity I don't mean an actual one, just a glaring facial flaw.
 
Sub4 is when you have absolutely zero options because foids around your looks level are going to be getting with average looking guys and sub2 women are either extremely rare or also getting with average guys.

By deformity I don't mean an actual one, just a glaring facial flaw.
Forget about dating options, you are treated as subhuman if you are below a 4 even a 3.5, yet you are treated normally as a 4. So the question is why is there such a difference in life quality between 1/2 or 1 point?
 
Forget about dating options, you are treated as subhuman if you are below a 4 even a 3.5, yet you are treated normally as a 4. So the question is why is there such a difference in life quality between 1/2 or 1 point?
Because being sub4 is much rarer as looks are on a bell curve. Being 3/10 is just as rare as being chadlite, and how often do you see chadlites?
 
Because being sub4 is much rarer as looks are on a bell curve. Being 3/10 is just as rare as being chadlite, and how often do you see chadlites?
I think 3/10's are more common than chadlites. It's easier to be ugly than attractive, that being said I admit it is uncommon but not that rare, 5-10 percent isn't that unlikely.
 

Similar threads

Choler
Replies
33
Views
740
glutty
glutty
universallyabhorres
Replies
10
Views
726
universallyabhorres
universallyabhorres
femcelbreedingnig
Replies
18
Views
736
Yabadadabadoo
Yabadadabadoo
packardD
Replies
12
Views
896
erenyeager
erenyeager

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top