Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Why is lookism no where near as discussed as racism?

T

TheUntermensch

satire
-
Joined
Sep 9, 2021
Posts
249
Well ofc we know why.....:fuk:

-Both are genetic (excluding being overweight)
-Both are to a large extent what society defines you by
-Both change your life experience depending on where you live
-Both cause one to be depicted as a statistic within a collective people, as opposed to an individual
-Both determine dating/job prospects
-Both are ultimately part of your outwards identity
 
Because people do not want lookism to end. Its waay deeper ingrained in us than racism. Its a fundamental property of life. Favouritism for good looking and tall people is mostly unconscious
 
Because people do not want lookism to end. Its waay deeper ingrained in us than racism. Its a fundamental property of life. Favouritism for good looking and tall people is mostly unconscious
brutal
 
Because it goes against the feminist agenda to admit ugly men are basically the most oppressed group ever, universally speaking.
 
I evaluate foids solely by their looks, most roasties are ugly and fat.

I want 2D qt hqnp waifu.
 
Because it goes against the feminist agenda to admit ugly men are basically the most oppressed group ever, universally speaking.
Tbh it goes against everyone's agenda........big fan of your music btw :feelsautistic:
 
Because some people have a hard time accepting that they themselves are ugly [1], and because only men truly suffer from lookism.

[1]Reminds me of a former colleague, a dusky 5'5" manlet who regularly showed up to work wearing elevator shoes, whose SMV was therefore at best 3/10, telling me that he rates himself as 7/10, or 8/10 on a good day, as he put it. I (5'7") could have told him the truth, that he was at best 3/10 due to extreme shortness, and that I was at best 4/10 likewise due to shortness, but for the most part, I kept him in his delusional state, because I don't normally blackpill people IRL.
 
Because some people have a hard time accepting that they themselves are ugly [1], and because only men truly suffer from lookism.

[1]Reminds me of a former colleague, a dusky 5'5" manlet who regularly showed up to work wearing elevator shoes, whose SMV was therefore at best 3/10, telling me that he rates himself as 7/10, or 8/10 on a good day, as he put it. I (5'7") could have told him the truth, that he was at best 3/10 due to extreme shortness, and that I was at best 4/10 likewise due to shortness, but for the most part, I kept him in his delusional state, because I don't normally blackpill people IRL.
:fuk:
 
most normies think they are chads
 
lookism only exists against (ugly) men. ugly/ fat women are celebrated.
 
most normies think they are chads
cus most m normies have no fucking clue what a good looking guy looks like or how to rate. Like pretty tik tok boys they would rate low, but foids are WET for them
 
Well ofc we know why.....:fuk:

-Both are genetic (excluding being overweight)
-Both are to a large extent what society defines you by
-Both change your life experience depending on where you live
-Both cause one to be depicted as a statistic within a collective people, as opposed to an individual
-Both determine dating/job prospects
-Both are ultimately part of your outwards identity
The objective of anti-racist policies is to support a socialist model. Why do leftist parties support mass migration from third countries to the West? Because is to the solely purpose to win voters for socialist policies(free healthcare, free housing etc etc). Those politicians don’t care the people that are leaving their countries for their own good. What they care is to use their speech to perpetuate power.
In other hand anti-lookism is against feminism. Current feminism is just socialism. Foids want to be like the most powerful men despite that they have a better quality of life than most men themselves(more foids on College, less homeless foids in comparison of men, an inferior suicide rate in comparison with men). Current feminism is the apex fallacy turned into a movement and Governmental policies. Current feminism push socialist agendas that make foids life easier than they used to be with men money(taxes). If lookism had been discussed as racism and the social contract wasn’t broken foids would have married with their lookmatch counterparts and will be no need to push the feminist agenda because most people would have been find. If lookism had been discussed as racism most men would have already done something because feminism and the current social model expropriates most men while most of them don’t have something in return in a long run while is a win to win to foids.
 
Because normies would scream incel whenever someone would point it out. Normies support discrimination based purely on looks even though they won’t admit it. And they subconciously act on lookist behaviour. It won’t happen, and even if it did, lookism would still happen
 
Well ofc we know why.....:fuk:

-Both are genetic (excluding being overweight)
-Both are to a large extent what society defines you by
-Both change your life experience depending on where you live
-Both cause one to be depicted as a statistic within a collective people, as opposed to an individual
-Both determine dating/job prospects
-Both are ultimately part of your outwards identity
because no women are to benefit from lookism being eradicated
Because normies would scream incel whenever someone would point it out.
 
Well ofc we know why.....:fuk:

-Both are genetic (excluding being overweight)
-Both are to a large extent what society defines you by
-Both change your life experience depending on where you live
-Both cause one to be depicted as a statistic within a collective people, as opposed to an individual
-Both determine dating/job prospects
-Both are ultimately part of your outwards identity
cuz you're not entitled to women asshole :foidSoy:
 
Because it makes Figs look bad.. so the Figs lie about Lookism and the white knights see this and adopt the tactic. This is observable throughout the industrial era and has been exacerbated by the creation and proliferation of better technology and social media. Lies can become Truths if you spout the Lie enough.. social media is proof of this. Figs have Lied non stop to Men about it not being about Looks and the white knights have taken upon themselves the holy crusade against any Men that ever dare say the Truth about Figs. They don't get a whiff of pussy for their effort.. their piety will last to the grave in their diseased brains, so convinced in their blue pilled ways that a Fig is waiting for him around every corner.
 
who doesnot love beautiful things?
 
Because when it comes to sexual discrimination we allow it. Unfortunately we can’t force foids to select us. They would never willingly do it.
 
because its a real issue in which most people are perpetrators and besides society doesnt care about ugly men theyd rather worry about other dumb issues like foids being allowed to murder babies
Because people do not want lookism to end. Its waay deeper ingrained in us than racism. Its a fundamental property of life. Favouritism for good looking and tall people is mostly unconscious
we live in a society :society:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top