AsiaCel
[AIDS] ACCELERATIONIST INCEL DEATH SQUAD
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2017
- Posts
- 21,029
One of the things that had been bothering me is the question of why face is so much important than body?
A strong face with chisled features like browridge and big jaw can withstand hits better, therefore the traits became attractive for mating preference.
However, the body, is much larger part of us. Evolution wise, in the primal world a large frame and tall height would be advantageous in fights and therefore, surviving. A disadvantage being that these features require massive resources, boatload of food daily which can be hard to come by in the wild. On the contrary, your browridge or square jaw won't mean much. A grizzly bear will just rip you off as easily, at least body guy might be strong and can run off or even fight the animal.
A browridge or a square jaw however, much like the frame and height, withstand hits better to the head, and that they take little to no resources compared to the body traits. E.g. a square jaw doesn't require hundreds or thousands more calories daily and is a mild resource investment, yet may just be attractive as the body traits.
My question is that, according to the 'trait cost' theory, shouldn't body features, like large frame which is expensive to keep be more attractive to cheap features like square jaw?
A strong face with chisled features like browridge and big jaw can withstand hits better, therefore the traits became attractive for mating preference.
However, the body, is much larger part of us. Evolution wise, in the primal world a large frame and tall height would be advantageous in fights and therefore, surviving. A disadvantage being that these features require massive resources, boatload of food daily which can be hard to come by in the wild. On the contrary, your browridge or square jaw won't mean much. A grizzly bear will just rip you off as easily, at least body guy might be strong and can run off or even fight the animal.
A browridge or a square jaw however, much like the frame and height, withstand hits better to the head, and that they take little to no resources compared to the body traits. E.g. a square jaw doesn't require hundreds or thousands more calories daily and is a mild resource investment, yet may just be attractive as the body traits.
My question is that, according to the 'trait cost' theory, shouldn't body features, like large frame which is expensive to keep be more attractive to cheap features like square jaw?
Last edited: