![TallCelFag](/data/avatars/m/24/24171.jpg?1662889756)
TallCelFag
30, autistic, 3/10 face, 2 months sober
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2020
- Posts
- 7,254
What’s your take? I’m unsure myself so want to see what you guys think.
I think this is key. Basically a significant number people who want to die are still productive and are therefore valuable to society.i also think the production factor of human capital
I agree but what about people who aren’t capable of being productive in today’s society? Why not let go of them at least, if they want to die?It's bad for the economy if the slaves kill themselves
and (((media))) is dedicated to instilling "hope" into the slaves so they feel they have a chance to attain what they will never get.It's bad for the economy if the slaves kill themselves
exactly, everyone else is coping about human life being sacred.those taxes aren't gonna pay themselves
Sadistic liberal or religious types thinking they know better, can't perceive what the other party is feeling, believe it's up to god & a sin or secretly get off on others suffering.I agree but what about people who aren’t capable of being productive in today’s society? Why not let go of them at least, if they want to die?
There's big money in prolonging the suffering & half-life of the should be dead.My guess for at least the US would be that healthcare and pharma industry will fight this tooth and nail. Maybe it's not the main reason, but I still think it's a huge one
I remember reading somewhere that some outrageous amount of money in healthcare is spent on what officially is referred to as "end-of-life care". Basically, if you spread healthcare expenditure for an average person along the lifeline, preventative care over early years is a small drop in the bucket. The largest piece of the pie would usually be close to the end of life (of course, if you don't die suddenly), when the whole team of expensive doctors ruthlessly fight for your life for a whole month after your stroke, perform 3 or 4 brain surgeries, provide you a 24/7 care and then you still die in a stepdown ward a month later. The hospital will bill your insurance potentially for millions. Same logic goes for terminal and/or hereditary illness with slim chances to ever recover. Imagine if every such person is magically given a choice - you either spend your next 2 months under these 20 tubes in a vegetative state, unconscious, without being able to say anything or you die today peacefully. Many people would choose the latter, but I imagine doctors being very upset about it for pure financial reasons, apart from ethical reasons of course.
This is the only real reason. Dead people don't pay taxes and keep the CEOs wealthy.It's bad for the economy if the slaves kill themselves
Brutal late-to-reply-with-this pill.those taxes aren't gonna pay themselves
like the state's position on prostitution, the true justifications against euthanasia are rooted in pro-life secular and religious ideologies the majority, by their numbers, enjoys forcing on everybody else.
Because it would legitimize suicide, the thing they want to avoid at all costs.I agree but what about people who aren’t capable of being productive in today’s society? Why not let go of them at least, if they want to die?