Why Incels Are Reluctant To Help Women In Need (maybe)

[A Good Friend]

It is because the incel feels his invalidation by seemingly all of womanhood is a greater injustice than your assault.

Is he right?

Wrong question. What's important is the he thinks he's right.

The incels invalidation stains him. He is not obsessed with sex because he'll die without it, he's obsessed because what many take for granted is, for him, a near impossible obstacle.

It's one thing to deny him sex, quite another to deny him the right to have any sex

His incentive isn't just grounded in the physical act of sex, but also in pair-bonding, and the strong familial defense instinct. This is why these men wouldn't help you on any scale. By denying his right to reproduce, you are directly challenging his instinct to reproduce. This puts his future children in jeopardy. It's as though you've murdered them before they were conceived. You can't commit such an act of violence (even if you are unaware you have) and then expect a helping hand.

The incel is not only reluctant to help, but has something to gain in your misfortune; What he sees as "punishment" for a transgression brought against his entire lineage.

I know this seems far-fetched, but don't you wonder why you get this reaction out of sexually-starved young men? There is more to it than social expectations, you are challenging some of his strongest inborn instincts. Sometimes you have to look beyond the easy explanation to find the right one.

Incels don't exist in a vacuum, you have to create them.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Actually, I am not reluctant to help anyone, regardless of gender. Call me a cuck, or whatever. But it's true. I only expect others to help me when I'm in need. (Not talking about sex, BTW.)

 

[Kointo1]

"No one is entitled to anything"

                          - inceltears

 

[KyloRen]

His incentive isn't just grounded in the physical act of sex, but also in pair-bonding, and the strong familial defense instinct. This is why these men wouldn't help you on any scale. By denying his right to reproduce, you are directly challenging his instinct to reproduce. This puts his future children in jeopardy. It's as though you've murdered them before they were conceived. You can't commit such an act of violence (even if you are unaware you have) and then expect a helping hand. 

This is a very good analysis and I wholeheartedly agree.

Reproduction is a basic human instinct, it functions in our subconscious. So, even if we do not consciously think about certain actions, these ideas are, deep down in our brains, being circulated. By never even having the opportunity to reproduce, it's as if we have no future, since our genetic offspring will never exist.

Similar ideas are seen in the animal kingdom. For instance, for those animals who fail to attract a mate, they act as a "wingman" for their brother or cousin, helping him to attract a mate and reproduce. If said brother or cousin is able to reproduce, then, the incel still "wins" (partially) because his genes were passed vicariously (by the family member).

 

[Mahlo]

Why should I put myself at risk to help a woman when she wouldn't do the same for me?

 

[KyloRen]

"No one is entitled to anything"

                          - inceltears

"You're such a bad person!!! No wonder you don't have a girlfriend!!! What girl will want to date a guy with such a horrible personality!!!"

 

[TheRealChincel]

I don’t have these feelings or attachments you’re describing. My life is basically avoiding boredom with a few moments of terror. What is it like to love, I mean, familial love?

 

[NeverSubmit]

I will not help the normies because they are my enemy.

 

[A Good Friend]

I don’t have these feelings or attachments you’re describing. My life is basically avoiding boredom with a few moments of terror. What is it like to love, I mean, familial love?

If you have no attachment to possible future offspring, you then have never lusted nor jerked off, because the impetus comes from the desire to reproduce.

 

[Sub8Hate]

Why should I put myself at risk to help a woman when she wouldn't do the same for me?

 

[VincentVanCope]

I'm assuming by help you don't mean grabbing something off a tall shelf, or jump starting a car.

I am reluctant to help during an assault/rape because honestly, I'll just become the target while the woman runs away or just cowers. Self preservation is strong instinct. At least if I jump in for a guy getting mugged for example, he's very likely to help me in beating down his assailant. But with a woman, like I said, she'll cower and run away. I'll be left up shit creek without a paddle. So why should I?

I'll call the police from a safe distance.

 

[A Good Friend]

Why should I put myself at risk to help a woman when she wouldn't do the same for me?

Exactly, but the reason you harbor any ill will is the denial of sex, which our ape brain sees as the desire to smother our future family line in the cradle. You have eons of DNA, fighting and succeeding, screaming in your brain every time you so much as think of a beautiful women.

 

[idkwattodowithlife]

A small glimmer of hope?

 

[A Good Friend]

I'm assuming by help you don't mean grabbing something off a tall shelf, or jump starting a car.
I am reluctant to help during an assault/rape because honestly, I'll just become the target while the woman runs away or just cowers. Self preservation is strong instinct. At least if I jump in for a guy getting mugged for example, he's very likely to help me in beating down his assailant. But with a woman, like I said, she'll cower and run away. I'll be left up shit creek without a paddle. So why should I?
I'll call the police from a safe distance.

And if you were treated like a human being, like you should be, by women and society as a whole, you would gain incentive to risk it. You still may not do it, but the motivation would be stronger.

---

A small glimmer of hope?

Just a sugar-coated Blackpill. Easier to digest for outsiders. Debating them is stupid, but maybe an olive branch would help.