It's Over Why incels are feminists inadventently

[SlayerSlayer]

If you think about it, the big feminist boogeyman that is the patriarchy is Chad. Feminists hate the patriarchy. Incels hate Chad. There is clear overlap here. The 'patriarchy' isn't a bunch of gremlin looking manlet jews. They are more likely to be 6'9 Chad businessmen like Richard Branson or Don Draper. It's ironic because feminism always tries to pin the idea of the 'patriarchy' on ugly jew looking men, when in fact, it's the Chads that jew their way out of every situation unscathed due to the charm of good looks.

Ugly men sure as hell try to usurp the throne that is the patriarchy, because everyone is self-interested, but at the end of the day, the throne of the world (according to feminists) is one that can only be held by genetic elites. Feminists will be first in line to insist that the patriarchy is strictly HUUUWHITE MALE--- most likely a handsome able-bodied white male. They probably look Joe Goldberg handsome. Even the actor who played 'Joe' in the series 'You' is well aware of his own powers @1:58

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRQ5ntxnFaI


It's so fascinating to me that the actor probably despises the hybistropheliacs that love his character, yet the foids still insist that Joe's love is the kind of love that is obviously superior to some betabuxxer.

What feminists fail to realize is that the patriarchy cannot be abdicated. Even with well intentioned noble Chads, their powers are by default GIVEN, not earned. They will be listened by default even if they intend to be silent. Even if they go full on marxist tranny-- these Chads are STILL more powerful than all women and minorities combined.

What also makes no sense is how in god's name is the betabuxxer 'the patriarchy?' Women do not care about the facts that they hold all the cards in a relationshit. They just want to blame cuck men for spoiling them so hard they failed to achieve their dream of being Chad's tertiary mistress.

tldr-- feminist women inherently fight their own biological instincts because they are mentally ill. Incels fight Chad because his threat is real and omnipresent.

 

[Italian Incel]

how patriarchy would be connected to chads?

 

[SlayerSlayer]

how patriarchy would be connected to chads?

Chads are a cabal of genetic elites ruling the world, because if you rule the dating market you rule reproductive rights

 

[Mainländer]

The patriarchy is men in general having an established legal authory over women.

Chads "thrive" more in gynocentric harem societies, where they can hoard all the women through female hypergamy. In a patriarchy, your looks won't matter nearly as much as a man.

 

[SlayerSlayer]

The patriarchy is men in general having an established legal authory over women.

Chads "thrive" more in gynocentric harem societies, where they can hoard all the women through female hypergamy. In a patriarchy, your looks won't matter nearly as much as a man.

patriarchy is what incels WANT. patriarchy is what Chads HAVE

 

[Vrthraghna]

Patriarchy isn't forced monogamy.. I don't know why people here think so.

A simple google search defines it as such: "Patriarchy is an analytical concept referring to a system of political, social, and economic relations and institutions structured around the gender inequality of socially defined men and women"

However that's an overcomplicated definition knowing that "social and political relations" are all part of the superstructure that is the result of the economic base. So we can simplify our definition by only focus on the economic relations.
It also fails to point out the fact that all societies in human civilization have been hierarchical and ruled by a minority elite so all men were definitely not privileged over all women. There has been no human society in which ALL men collectively ruled over ALL women.

A better less complicated definition:
A society in which the powerful elite who control the reproductive economic assets are overwhelmingly/majority male.

Living in patriarchy as a lower class guy (e.g. incel wagecuck) sucks because you inherently have no value to your rulers (chad male employer), except your labour.
However, your female counterpart has inherent reproductive value (e.g. pussy power) to the rulers and can fuck her way into easy privileges (e.g. fuck your boss for a promotion.)

This is what the societal composition under patriarchy looks like:
1. Ruling class: Top 1%, overwhelmingly male
2. Female subjects: ~50%, has inherent reproductive value, sells her pussy
3. Male subjects: ~50%, working class cucks forced to sell their labor

Looks familiar?
Patriarchy IS chad.

Men knew this. That's why throughout patriarchal history they instituted forced monogamy, etc to make their rule appealing to their male subjects. Why males over females? because the economy at the time overwhelmingly depended on the labor/strength of men.

So what changed?
1. The economy shifted away from being overwhelmingly reliant on men especially with the rise of automation.
2. Cucked liberal culture made society and men too docile and too willing to sell their labor viewing it as a natural part of life and less likely to complain about sexual and economic inequality between themselves and their rulers.
It's so bad nowadays that if you simply point out how unfair it is that you can't get pussy you're automatically viewed as a terrible incel terrorist.

Another mistake people tend to make is thinking that patriarchy had to be imposed or forced on women by men. Patriarchy was simply a natural result of the economic facotrs of the time and had nothing to do with anything else, it certainly didn't require men to force it on anyone.
In fact women thrived under patriarchy and were complicit in it. Patriarchy and female hypergamy synergise very well together. By putting a minority of men (chads) in a powerful position allowing to afford multiple foids and the foids functioning as do-nothing-tutorial-mode baby-machines while the incel peasants and wage-cucks do everything in society.

 

[0Energy0Happyness]

Patriarchy is the narutal system of humanity, females are inferior all matriarchal societies that existed were defeated by superior patriarchal

 

[SlayerSlayer]

Patriarchy isn't forced monogamy.. I don't know why people here think so.

A simple google search defines it as such: "Patriarchy is an analytical concept referring to a system of political, social, and economic relations and institutions structured around the gender inequality of socially defined men and women"

However that's an overcomplicated definition knowing that "social and political relations" are all part of the superstructure that is the result of the economic base. So we can simplify our definition by only focus on the economic relations.
It also fails to point out the fact that all societies in human civilization have been hierarchical and ruled by a minority elite so all men were definitely not privileged over all women. There has been no human society in which ALL men collectively ruled over ALL women.

A better less complicated definition:
A society in which the powerful elite who control the reproductive economic assets are overwhelmingly/majority male.

Living in patriarchy as a lower class guy (e.g. incel wagecuck) sucks because you inherently have no value to your rulers (chad male employer), except your labour.
However, your female counterpart has inherent reproductive value (e.g. pussy power) to the rulers and can fuck her way into easy privileges (e.g. fuck your boss for a promotion.)

This is what the societal composition under patriarchy looks like:
1. Ruling class: Top 1%, overwhelmingly male
2. Female subjects: ~50%, has inherent reproductive value, sells her pussy
3. Male subjects: ~50%, working class cucks forced to sell their labor

Looks familiar?
Patriarchy IS chad.

Men knew this. That's why throughout patriarchal history they instituted forced monogamy, etc to make their rule appealing to their male subjects. Why males over females? because the economy at the time overwhelmingly depended on the labor/strength of men.

So what changed?
1. The economy shifted away from being overwhelmingly reliant on men especially with the rise of automation.
2. Cucked liberal culture made society and men too docile and too willing to sell their labor viewing it as a natural part of life and less likely to complain about sexual and economic inequality between themselves and their rulers.
It's so bad nowadays that if you simply point out how unfair it is that you can't get pussy you're automatically viewed as a terrible incel terrorist.

Another mistake people tend to make is thinking that patriarchy had to be imposed or forced on women by men. Patriarchy was simply a natural result of the economic facotrs of the time and had nothing to do with anything else, it certainly didn't require men to force it on anyone.
In fact women thrived under patriarchy and were complicit in it. Patriarchy and female hypergamy synergise very well together. By putting a minority of men (chads) in a powerful position allowing to afford multiple foids and the foids functioning as do-nothing-tutorial-mode baby-machines while the incel peasants and wage-cucks do everything in society.

high IQ post, explained way better than me

 

[sckicksal345]

I wouldn't say we fight chad more like sit around and rot while he slays

 

[fheon]

Patriarchy isn't forced monogamy.. I don't know why people here think so.

A simple google search defines it as such: "Patriarchy is an analytical concept referring to a system of political, social, and economic relations and institutions structured around the gender inequality of socially defined men and women"

However that's an overcomplicated definition knowing that "social and political relations" are all part of the superstructure that is the result of the economic base. So we can simplify our definition by only focus on the economic relations.
It also fails to point out the fact that all societies in human civilization have been hierarchical and ruled by a minority elite so all men were definitely not privileged over all women. There has been no human society in which ALL men collectively ruled over ALL women.

A better less complicated definition:
A society in which the powerful elite who control the reproductive economic assets are overwhelmingly/majority male.

Living in patriarchy as a lower class guy (e.g. incel wagecuck) sucks because you inherently have no value to your rulers (chad male employer), except your labour.
However, your female counterpart has inherent reproductive value (e.g. pussy power) to the rulers and can fuck her way into easy privileges (e.g. fuck your boss for a promotion.)

This is what the societal composition under patriarchy looks like:
1. Ruling class: Top 1%, overwhelmingly male
2. Female subjects: ~50%, has inherent reproductive value, sells her pussy
3. Male subjects: ~50%, working class cucks forced to sell their labor

Looks familiar?
Patriarchy IS chad.

Men knew this. That's why throughout patriarchal history they instituted forced monogamy, etc to make their rule appealing to their male subjects. Why males over females? because the economy at the time overwhelmingly depended on the labor/strength of men.

So what changed?
1. The economy shifted away from being overwhelmingly reliant on men especially with the rise of automation.
2. Cucked liberal culture made society and men too docile and too willing to sell their labor viewing it as a natural part of life and less likely to complain about sexual and economic inequality between themselves and their rulers.
It's so bad nowadays that if you simply point out how unfair it is that you can't get pussy you're automatically viewed as a terrible incel terrorist.

Another mistake people tend to make is thinking that patriarchy had to be imposed or forced on women by men. Patriarchy was simply a natural result of the economic facotrs of the time and had nothing to do with anything else, it certainly didn't require men to force it on anyone.
In fact women thrived under patriarchy and were complicit in it. Patriarchy and female hypergamy synergise very well together. By putting a minority of men (chads) in a powerful position allowing to afford multiple foids and the foids functioning as do-nothing-tutorial-mode baby-machines while the incel peasants and wage-cucks do everything in society.

Great post

 

[Neetocel]

If you think about it, the big feminist boogeyman that is the patriarchy is Chad. Feminists hate the patriarchy. Incels hate Chad. There is clear overlap here. The 'patriarchy' isn't a bunch of gremlin looking manlet jews. They are more likely to be 6'9 Chad businessmen like Richard Branson or Don Draper. It's ironic because feminism always tries to pin the idea of the 'patriarchy' on ugly jew looking men, when in fact, it's the Chads that jew their way out of every situation unscathed due to the charm of good looks.

Why do you guys use little names like Richard Branson to claim Chads rule the world? He has about 6 billion, that is peanuts in the billionaire neighbourhood. Go to the top, see Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Bezos, those are not chad at all. Chads benefit from the system but do not, as a class, rule it

 

[It all fell down]

The patriarchy is men in general having an established legal authory over women.

Chads "thrive" more in gynocentric harem societies, where they can hoard all the women through female hypergamy. In a patriarchy, your looks won't matter nearly as much as a man.

Looks will matter but your options as a Chad will be reduced for the sake of the society.

 

[ilieknothing]

I am a feminist because males and females should have equal amounts of sex. It’s time to close the gender sex gap