Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over Why incels are feminists inadventently

SlayerSlayer

SlayerSlayer

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Posts
10,561
Online
84d 21h 43m
If you think about it, the big feminist boogeyman that is the patriarchy is Chad. Feminists hate the patriarchy. Incels hate Chad. There is clear overlap here. The 'patriarchy' isn't a bunch of gremlin looking manlet jews. They are more likely to be 6'9 Chad businessmen like Richard Branson or Don Draper. It's ironic because feminism always tries to pin the idea of the 'patriarchy' on ugly jew looking men, when in fact, it's the Chads that jew their way out of every situation unscathed due to the charm of good looks.

Ugly men sure as hell try to usurp the throne that is the patriarchy, because everyone is self-interested, but at the end of the day, the throne of the world (according to feminists) is one that can only be held by genetic elites. Feminists will be first in line to insist that the patriarchy is strictly HUUUWHITE MALE--- most likely a handsome able-bodied white male. They probably look Joe Goldberg handsome. Even the actor who played 'Joe' in the series 'You' is well aware of his own powers @1:58

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRQ5ntxnFaI


It's so fascinating to me that the actor probably despises the hybistropheliacs that love his character, yet the foids still insist that Joe's love is the kind of love that is obviously superior to some betabuxxer.

What feminists fail to realize is that the patriarchy cannot be abdicated. Even with well intentioned noble Chads, their powers are by default GIVEN, not earned. They will be listened by default even if they intend to be silent. Even if they go full on marxist tranny-- these Chads are STILL more powerful than all women and minorities combined.

What also makes no sense is how in god's name is the betabuxxer 'the patriarchy?' Women do not care about the facts that they hold all the cards in a relationshit. They just want to blame cuck men for spoiling them so hard they failed to achieve their dream of being Chad's tertiary mistress.

tldr-- feminist women inherently fight their own biological instincts because they are mentally ill. Incels fight Chad because his threat is real and omnipresent.
 
Last edited:
Italian Incel

Italian Incel

Officer
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Posts
952
Online
5d 14h 13m
how patriarchy would be connected to chads?
 
SlayerSlayer

SlayerSlayer

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Posts
10,561
Online
84d 21h 43m
Italian Incel said:
how patriarchy would be connected to chads?
Chads are a cabal of genetic elites ruling the world, because if you rule the dating market you rule reproductive rights
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
36,406
Online
144d 17h 45m
The patriarchy is men in general having an established legal authory over women.

Chads "thrive" more in gynocentric harem societies, where they can hoard all the women through female hypergamy. In a patriarchy, your looks won't matter nearly as much as a man.
 
SlayerSlayer

SlayerSlayer

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Posts
10,561
Online
84d 21h 43m
Mainländer said:
The patriarchy is men in general having an established legal authory over women.

Chads "thrive" more in gynocentric harem societies, where they can hoard all the women through female hypergamy. In a patriarchy, your looks won't matter nearly as much as a man.
patriarchy is what incels WANT. patriarchy is what Chads HAVE
 
Vrthraghna

Vrthraghna

T - ∞
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Posts
1,053
Online
17d 21h 58m
Patriarchy isn't forced monogamy.. I don't know why people here think so.

A simple google search defines it as such: "Patriarchy is an analytical concept referring to a system of political, social, and economic relations and institutions structured around the gender inequality of socially defined men and women"

However that's an overcomplicated definition knowing that "social and political relations" are all part of the superstructure that is the result of the economic base. So we can simplify our definition by only focus on the economic relations.
It also fails to point out the fact that all societies in human civilization have been hierarchical and ruled by a minority elite so all men were definitely not privileged over all women. There has been no human society in which ALL men collectively ruled over ALL women.

A better less complicated definition:
A society in which the powerful elite who control the reproductive economic assets are overwhelmingly/majority male.

Living in patriarchy as a lower class guy (e.g. incel wagecuck) sucks because you inherently have no value to your rulers (chad male employer), except your labour.
However, your female counterpart has inherent reproductive value (e.g. pussy power) to the rulers and can fuck her way into easy privileges (e.g. fuck your boss for a promotion.)

This is what the societal composition under patriarchy looks like:
1. Ruling class: Top 1%, overwhelmingly male
2. Female subjects: ~50%, has inherent reproductive value, sells her pussy
3. Male subjects: ~50%, working class cucks forced to sell their labor

Looks familiar?
Patriarchy IS chad.

Men knew this. That's why throughout patriarchal history they instituted forced monogamy, etc to make their rule appealing to their male subjects. Why males over females? because the economy at the time overwhelmingly depended on the labor/strength of men.

So what changed?
1. The economy shifted away from being overwhelmingly reliant on men especially with the rise of automation.
2. Cucked liberal culture made society and men too docile and too willing to sell their labor viewing it as a natural part of life and less likely to complain about sexual and economic inequality between themselves and their rulers.
It's so bad nowadays that if you simply point out how unfair it is that you can't get pussy you're automatically viewed as a terrible incel terrorist.

Another mistake people tend to make is thinking that patriarchy had to be imposed or forced on women by men. Patriarchy was simply a natural result of the economic facotrs of the time and had nothing to do with anything else, it certainly didn't require men to force it on anyone.
In fact women thrived under patriarchy and were complicit in it. Patriarchy and female hypergamy synergise very well together. By putting a minority of men (chads) in a powerful position allowing to afford multiple foids and the foids functioning as do-nothing-tutorial-mode baby-machines while the incel peasants and wage-cucks do everything in society.
 
Last edited:
0Energy0Happyness

0Energy0Happyness

I think u a fed
★★★
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Posts
4,708
Online
39d 9h 36m
Patriarchy is the narutal system of humanity, females are inferior all matriarchal societies that existed were defeated by superior patriarchal
 
SlayerSlayer

SlayerSlayer

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Posts
10,561
Online
84d 21h 43m
Vrthraghna said:
Patriarchy isn't forced monogamy.. I don't know why people here think so.

A simple google search defines it as such: "Patriarchy is an analytical concept referring to a system of political, social, and economic relations and institutions structured around the gender inequality of socially defined men and women"

However that's an overcomplicated definition knowing that "social and political relations" are all part of the superstructure that is the result of the economic base. So we can simplify our definition by only focus on the economic relations.
It also fails to point out the fact that all societies in human civilization have been hierarchical and ruled by a minority elite so all men were definitely not privileged over all women. There has been no human society in which ALL men collectively ruled over ALL women.

A better less complicated definition:
A society in which the powerful elite who control the reproductive economic assets are overwhelmingly/majority male.

Living in patriarchy as a lower class guy (e.g. incel wagecuck) sucks because you inherently have no value to your rulers (chad male employer), except your labour.
However, your female counterpart has inherent reproductive value (e.g. pussy power) to the rulers and can fuck her way into easy privileges (e.g. fuck your boss for a promotion.)

This is what the societal composition under patriarchy looks like:
1. Ruling class: Top 1%, overwhelmingly male
2. Female subjects: ~50%, has inherent reproductive value, sells her pussy
3. Male subjects: ~50%, working class cucks forced to sell their labor

Looks familiar?
Patriarchy IS chad.

Men knew this. That's why throughout patriarchal history they instituted forced monogamy, etc to make their rule appealing to their male subjects. Why males over females? because the economy at the time overwhelmingly depended on the labor/strength of men.

So what changed?
1. The economy shifted away from being overwhelmingly reliant on men especially with the rise of automation.
2. Cucked liberal culture made society and men too docile and too willing to sell their labor viewing it as a natural part of life and less likely to complain about sexual and economic inequality between themselves and their rulers.
It's so bad nowadays that if you simply point out how unfair it is that you can't get pussy you're automatically viewed as a terrible incel terrorist.

Another mistake people tend to make is thinking that patriarchy had to be imposed or forced on women by men. Patriarchy was simply a natural result of the economic facotrs of the time and had nothing to do with anything else, it certainly didn't require men to force it on anyone.
In fact women thrived under patriarchy and were complicit in it. Patriarchy and female hypergamy synergise very well together. By putting a minority of men (chads) in a powerful position allowing to afford multiple foids and the foids functioning as do-nothing-tutorial-mode baby-machines while the incel peasants and wage-cucks do everything in society.
high IQ post, explained way better than me
 
sckicksal345

sckicksal345

humanity is a disgusting wretched depraved species
★★★
Joined
Nov 29, 2020
Posts
5,205
Online
64d 7h 9m
I wouldn't say we fight chad more like sit around and rot while he slays :fuk:
 
F

fheon

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Mar 11, 2021
Posts
318
Online
8d 1h 12m
Vrthraghna said:
Patriarchy isn't forced monogamy.. I don't know why people here think so.

A simple google search defines it as such: "Patriarchy is an analytical concept referring to a system of political, social, and economic relations and institutions structured around the gender inequality of socially defined men and women"

However that's an overcomplicated definition knowing that "social and political relations" are all part of the superstructure that is the result of the economic base. So we can simplify our definition by only focus on the economic relations.
It also fails to point out the fact that all societies in human civilization have been hierarchical and ruled by a minority elite so all men were definitely not privileged over all women. There has been no human society in which ALL men collectively ruled over ALL women.

A better less complicated definition:
A society in which the powerful elite who control the reproductive economic assets are overwhelmingly/majority male.

Living in patriarchy as a lower class guy (e.g. incel wagecuck) sucks because you inherently have no value to your rulers (chad male employer), except your labour.
However, your female counterpart has inherent reproductive value (e.g. pussy power) to the rulers and can fuck her way into easy privileges (e.g. fuck your boss for a promotion.)

This is what the societal composition under patriarchy looks like:
1. Ruling class: Top 1%, overwhelmingly male
2. Female subjects: ~50%, has inherent reproductive value, sells her pussy
3. Male subjects: ~50%, working class cucks forced to sell their labor

Looks familiar?
Patriarchy IS chad.

Men knew this. That's why throughout patriarchal history they instituted forced monogamy, etc to make their rule appealing to their male subjects. Why males over females? because the economy at the time overwhelmingly depended on the labor/strength of men.

So what changed?
1. The economy shifted away from being overwhelmingly reliant on men especially with the rise of automation.
2. Cucked liberal culture made society and men too docile and too willing to sell their labor viewing it as a natural part of life and less likely to complain about sexual and economic inequality between themselves and their rulers.
It's so bad nowadays that if you simply point out how unfair it is that you can't get pussy you're automatically viewed as a terrible incel terrorist.

Another mistake people tend to make is thinking that patriarchy had to be imposed or forced on women by men. Patriarchy was simply a natural result of the economic facotrs of the time and had nothing to do with anything else, it certainly didn't require men to force it on anyone.
In fact women thrived under patriarchy and were complicit in it. Patriarchy and female hypergamy synergise very well together. By putting a minority of men (chads) in a powerful position allowing to afford multiple foids and the foids functioning as do-nothing-tutorial-mode baby-machines while the incel peasants and wage-cucks do everything in society.
Great post
 
Neetocel

Neetocel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Posts
234
Online
10d 23h 4m
SlayerSlayer said:
If you think about it, the big feminist boogeyman that is the patriarchy is Chad. Feminists hate the patriarchy. Incels hate Chad. There is clear overlap here. The 'patriarchy' isn't a bunch of gremlin looking manlet jews. They are more likely to be 6'9 Chad businessmen like Richard Branson or Don Draper. It's ironic because feminism always tries to pin the idea of the 'patriarchy' on ugly jew looking men, when in fact, it's the Chads that jew their way out of every situation unscathed due to the charm of good looks.

Why do you guys use little names like Richard Branson to claim Chads rule the world? He has about 6 billion, that is peanuts in the billionaire neighbourhood. Go to the top, see Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Bezos, those are not chad at all. Chads benefit from the system but do not, as a class, rule it
 
It all fell down

It all fell down

Banned
-
Joined
Aug 9, 2021
Posts
704
Online
13d 10h 32m
Mainländer said:
The patriarchy is men in general having an established legal authory over women.

Chads "thrive" more in gynocentric harem societies, where they can hoard all the women through female hypergamy. In a patriarchy, your looks won't matter nearly as much as a man.
Looks will matter but your options as a Chad will be reduced for the sake of the society.
 
ilieknothing

ilieknothing

Admiral
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
2,996
Online
59d 5h 44m
I am a feminist because males and females should have equal amounts of sex. It’s time to close the gender sex gap
 
SlayerSlayer

SlayerSlayer

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Posts
10,561
Online
84d 21h 43m
Neetocel said:
Why do you guys use little names like Richard Branson to claim Chads rule the world? He has about 6 billion, that is peanuts in the billionaire neighbourhood. Go to the top, see Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Bezos, those are not chad at all. Chads benefit from the system but do not, as a class, rule it
Zuck, Gates, and Bezos are all cucks who are happy with 3rd rate pussy tbh
 
Neetocel

Neetocel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Posts
234
Online
10d 23h 4m
SlayerSlayer said:
Zuck, Gates, and Bezos are all cucks who are happy with 3rd rate pussy tbh

That is my point, they are not Chads. The world is not ruled by Chads. Chads are just one of most benefited from the system, but they do not rule the system, those are the top political class at superpowers and the wealthiest people.
 
SlayerSlayer

SlayerSlayer

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Posts
10,561
Online
84d 21h 43m
Neetocel said:
That is my point, they are not Chads. The world is not ruled by Chads. Chads are just one of most benefited from the system, but they do not rule the system, those are the top political class at superpowers and the wealthiest people.
They can never own us spiritually the way a Chad can is my point.
 
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top