I disagree.
Whites are way worse than shitskins in violence and cruelty. You are witnessing it in Palestine rn.
>Jews
>White
Pick one.
As another user here pointed out, the media in America & the West intentionally goes out of their way to portray Jews as closer to Whites by showcasing the most "White" looking Jews & whilst also showcasing the most shitskin MENAs.
In 2024 a whole nation has their land stolen from them and are being genocides in broad daylight and all white countries are cheering the genocides and giving them every kind of support.
See above, it's due to lookism & the media intentionally portraying Jews as "White" whilst only showing the most shitskin MENAs possible.
I don't consider these countries to actually be White for many reasons:
-Many, such as the US & Russia, have been diluted racially
-These countries are not set-up to work in favor of the Whites within them.
Example:
Shitskins are dumb, corrupt and weak. But overall I won't out them too much below whites because of the extreme racial violence that whites have shown throughout history.
Every race has been violent, I dont see how certain acts make it any different.
This is ethnic cleansing. It's nothing like what Arabs did. Or even mongols did.
Both did kill considerable amounts of people though.
Consider the technological gap also.
Mongols and Arabs and every other conquerer in history they just wanted to conquer and expand their empire.
That's what Whites did also....
virtually every race has conquered another in someway at some point. Even Blacks conquered each other, which is how slavery began.
They weren't after ethnic cleansing. They didn't consider themselves the superior race
False:
(what some MENA said about Whites).
Not to mention, Arabs/MENA had a slave-trade also:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Yet I've never heard about this from the MSM or anyone demand reparations for this.
. Not even 50 years after mongols conquered Iran, Khaje Nasir Tusi became a very influential figure in their court and an adviser to the mongol king.IIt was the same with Arabs.
Many Whites did the same.
They collaborated with local-rulers who sold-out their countries, Indians often held various roles within British administration of the continent.
Compare that to what whites did in America and how they treated the local population.
Most died due to disease, around 80-90% or so. Even modern Liberal scholars debate if it was a genocide.
Nowadays, Whites send them money & offer compensation for what we did.
Beforehand, not much existed in terms of civilization: Afterwards, Whites made it into a livable area which outdid Europe & achieved many scientific attainments.
Mongols, on the other hand, occupied a country which already was very developed for the time & advanced with much to adapt/learn from.
It took the so called bloodthirsty Mongols 50 years to appoint a local Iranian to an extremely high status position.
Reminder about stuff that they did:
The Mongol army conquered hundreds of cities and villages and killed millions of people. One estimate is that about 10 percent of the world's population was killed either during or immediately after the
Mongolinvasions, around 37.75–60 million people in
Eurasia.
en.wikipedia.org
Regardless of the motives or how they behaved afterwards, that still is a genocide in the literal context.
It took whites 600 fucking years to make a black guy president and 400 years to consider blacks even human.
Comparing Blacks to MENA isn't a good example, since I concede Persia & other MENA regions always had a somewhat admirable culture.
That guy who you spoke of functioned in a similar manner to the British & other Europeans co-operating with local leaders.
It's ridiculous to compare whites with Arabs or Mongols. The thirst for ethnic blood that whites have is unparalleled in history.
I'd say it's a fair comparison, when you take into account the fact that they conquered, subjugated, and imposed their beliefs on others.
You cannot deny basic biological facts, that all humans are violent regardless of race: Many on here have spoke of Asiatics seemingly cold/uncaring nature, and how Arabs behaved in a similar way to Whites in history. If let's say either group had discovered the Americas,
Heck, the Indian continent still has issues due to MENAs imposing Islam on them: Yes, I am aware of the plan the Anglos used to divide it up, but the seeds for that were planted when Arabs/Persians imposed Islam on the populace there.
@Chudpreet @Made in Heaven