Serious Why female sexual freedom is not needed

[cryptic__egg]

While foids may want to date chad, the strict criteria shown through hypergamy is not simply a result of foids having ideal images of the perfect man. In reality, most people are perfectly capable of accepting a less-than-ideal scenario if the possibility of the ideal is taken away from them. The problem with modern society is that the possibility of dating giga-chad is simply never taken away from foids. You will not be able to justify aiming for less than perfection when perfection seems like it's just a few self-improvement steps away, but when you are forced to accept that you can't get perfection, you'll happily settle for the best you can get.

By giving foids sexual freedom, we have only placed in their minds the idea that Chad is constantly within reach, encouraging them to reach for him endlessly while ignore deserving men like us. By taking away sexual freedom, foids will be forced to accept what they are given, and will simply work with the best they can get within their new boundaries. Humans do not feel constant pain due to the existence of limits, but we do feel discomfort when something seems possible but we fail to get it. Female sexual freedom only serves to decrease the chances of a foid ever being happy.

People that argue against this fail to realize that people will naturally grow within the limits they're given, and that by giving females total control over their sex lives we are only encouraging them to grow to a cancerous extent, demanding more than they'll ever get while rejecting good men (men which then become incels). By controlling female sexuality we will help foids keep their expectations achievable while also making men like ourselves happy with life, which we all deserve.

 

[FlyFace]

Female Freedom is an obstacle for Humanities survival. Toilets that are free ruin society and make war.

 

[Koruga]

However, the incels are not in a similar place, do you mean that we should work on our limits and live a "happy" life?

 

[cryptic__egg]

Female Freedom is an obstacle for Humanities survival. Toilets that are free ruin society and make war.

Exactly and my point is that restriction wouldn't even cause them suffering.

However, the incels are not in a similar place, do you mean that we should work on our limits and live a "happy" life?

Further limiting incels won't help, as we already lack social bonds, which are naturally important for humans and can't be neglected even with adjusted expectations.

 

[FlyFace]

By controlling female sexuality we will help foids keep their expectations achievable while also making men like ourselves happy with life, which we all deserve.

The only language Toilets understand is threats and violence.. like how it was for all of time until 100 years ago in this shit hole society.

 

[cryptic__egg]

The only language Toilets understand is threats and violence.. like how it was for all of time until 100 years ago in this shit hole society.

Threats aren't logically bad. Again, threats simply impose a limit, and you learn to live with it. Threatening females that refuse to serve males would be very effective.

 

[FlyFace]

Exactly and my point is that restriction wouldn't even cause them suffering.

They always shriek about oppression when it is oppression that is their goal. They want to be oppressed by Chad.. the best genetic specimen, they just won't tell you that because they want to gaslight you into believing that is you that is the problem not them.

 

[ItsOver4cel]

water is wet, sexual freedom ruined our chances

 

[FlyFace]

Threats aren't logically bad. Again, threats simply impose a limit, and you learn to live with it. Threatening females that refuse to serve males would be very effective.

Threats are nothing without the follow through. You can threaten someone all you want, if you don't actually follow through you just look stupid.

 

[cryptic__egg]

water is wet, sexual freedom ruined our chances

It is a water is wet tier fact. My main point is that females wouldn't be unhappy without freedom; it's not a battle, both sides win if we impose proper restrictions. This goes against what feminists love to say.

 

[FlyFace]

It is a water is wet tier fact. My main point is that females wouldn't be unhappy without freedom; it's not a battle, both sides win if we impose proper restrictions. This goes against what feminists love to say.

Feminists will never surrender and will use dirty tactics to get what they want.. I've seen them do it myself. They threaten everyone who does not kotow to their mental illness.

 

[cryptic__egg]

Feminists will never surrender and will use dirty tactics to get what they want.. I've seen them do it myself. They threaten everyone who does not kotow to their mental illness.

Feminists that act aggressively against society when we are controlling females as we should would need to be locked in jail to protect everyone else.

 

[StormWind]

The only language Toilets understand is threats and violence.. like how it was for all of time until 100 years ago in this shit hole society.

True, females are allergic to logic.

Feminists that act aggressively against society when we are controlling females as we should would need to be locked in jail to protect everyone else.

Feminists should be put on a pike

 

[ItsOver4cel]

This goes against what feminists love to say.

good point