B
Aside from the whole immediate looks thing, why over-time do people still tend to tolerate Chads/better looking guys even amongst their bullshit antics? And what about among family, etc. where it isn't about mating but about tolerating and not doing anything about them?
For example, I grew up with a Chadly-tier cousin who would be entitled, cause havoc, do drugs, go borderline-insane, and he's still "cool" with the family even after 10 years. If you were repeatedly causing havoc amongst your family, would you still be the "cool and okay masculine guy" 10+ years later? Would your family tolerate you throwing BS fits and drama with your current looks vs. if you looked way better?
Hell, most incels can't even be seen as that kind of okay, "cool dude" masculine aesthetic that Chads give off at first impression or over time, let alone maintain this privileged position of being able to get away with so much crap. It's most frustrating knowing these more mascthetic dudes get away with more BS. People fear them more, or respect them more, or plead with them more, and etc. They are always "bros."
But my real question is, why? Like, among families especially where you're more familiar with them and thus the power of looks you'd think would wear off as everyone gets used to your looks -- you aren't "new" to a place where you're more striking, alluring, etc. but nevertheless these guys are still worshipped. It's like Chads aren't just better looking, but better able to manipulate or create some sort of standing with this combo.
I've seen even Beckies, Stacies, etc. that families kick out, disown, etc. but I feel it's always a bit harder to completely disown a legit Chad from a normal family, i.e., Chads are let to pull more BS and be involved in dirty business, whereas even your average Becky might be disowned by her family for far less in comparison. So in a way Chad might even get away with more shit than an average woman sometimes.
For example, I grew up with a Chadly-tier cousin who would be entitled, cause havoc, do drugs, go borderline-insane, and he's still "cool" with the family even after 10 years. If you were repeatedly causing havoc amongst your family, would you still be the "cool and okay masculine guy" 10+ years later? Would your family tolerate you throwing BS fits and drama with your current looks vs. if you looked way better?
Hell, most incels can't even be seen as that kind of okay, "cool dude" masculine aesthetic that Chads give off at first impression or over time, let alone maintain this privileged position of being able to get away with so much crap. It's most frustrating knowing these more mascthetic dudes get away with more BS. People fear them more, or respect them more, or plead with them more, and etc. They are always "bros."
But my real question is, why? Like, among families especially where you're more familiar with them and thus the power of looks you'd think would wear off as everyone gets used to your looks -- you aren't "new" to a place where you're more striking, alluring, etc. but nevertheless these guys are still worshipped. It's like Chads aren't just better looking, but better able to manipulate or create some sort of standing with this combo.
I've seen even Beckies, Stacies, etc. that families kick out, disown, etc. but I feel it's always a bit harder to completely disown a legit Chad from a normal family, i.e., Chads are let to pull more BS and be involved in dirty business, whereas even your average Becky might be disowned by her family for far less in comparison. So in a way Chad might even get away with more shit than an average woman sometimes.
Last edited:
