For starters, why do people just assume women's rights are a good thing? There's a post up on inceltears right now, on the front page, wow just wowing at somebody on braincels saying they don't think women should have rights, as if this alone is worthy of getting you on inceltears (nothing out there, nothing that could be considered humourous, just a plainly-stated opinion). All the comments to all of these posts ever just talk about what a piece of shit the guy saying it must be. Nobody ever talks about WHY women's rights are good. Do women's rights benefit society? Do they make the world a more pleasant, more prosperous, safer place to live? Do they make women happier, do they benefit children, do they benefit men? No mention of this. Giving women things is good, it just is.
Same with other stuff men give women or hand them passes on. You can't hit women, nobody asks why if the woman brings it upon herself. Women receive lighter sentences, nobody asks why this is a good thing. Obviously women receive free shit because they are desirable, but the pussy passes they get and the lack of any real justification of or argumentation for it amazes me. It doesn't matter if it's objectively beneficial, when a woman is treated nicely it's inherently moral and you are a piece of shit if you disagree.
Cucks' brains shut down whenever they get the opportunity to do what they think is respectful to women. How is it reproductively beneficial to be a cuck that unflinchingly agrees women deserve to be treated like princesses though? They will fuck Chad anyway if you deem it to be inherently moral that they be given a pass to do everything. Even if it's environmental, how did our culture get to this point if the people whose brains shut down the hardest when giving women things, desperate cucked men, seem to be less likely to be reproductively successful than their behavioural opposites and seem to get fucked over endlessly by it afterwards?
The people who fancy themselves as rational Rick and Morty-watching renaissance men the most think the least when there is a fair maiden in need of something. Why hasn't this behaviour been extinguished by repeated experience with its results? Is it single motherhood making them act like this?
Same with other stuff men give women or hand them passes on. You can't hit women, nobody asks why if the woman brings it upon herself. Women receive lighter sentences, nobody asks why this is a good thing. Obviously women receive free shit because they are desirable, but the pussy passes they get and the lack of any real justification of or argumentation for it amazes me. It doesn't matter if it's objectively beneficial, when a woman is treated nicely it's inherently moral and you are a piece of shit if you disagree.
Cucks' brains shut down whenever they get the opportunity to do what they think is respectful to women. How is it reproductively beneficial to be a cuck that unflinchingly agrees women deserve to be treated like princesses though? They will fuck Chad anyway if you deem it to be inherently moral that they be given a pass to do everything. Even if it's environmental, how did our culture get to this point if the people whose brains shut down the hardest when giving women things, desperate cucked men, seem to be less likely to be reproductively successful than their behavioural opposites and seem to get fucked over endlessly by it afterwards?
The people who fancy themselves as rational Rick and Morty-watching renaissance men the most think the least when there is a fair maiden in need of something. Why hasn't this behaviour been extinguished by repeated experience with its results? Is it single motherhood making them act like this?
