jet112
Incelmatics
★★
- Joined
- May 13, 2018
- Posts
- 2,148
woman avoid relationships like fire
Cope. Women find relationships preferable but most can't get one with who they actually want (Chad).
Wrong. OP is right. Women prefer to share the top men then enter a relationship with a middle-of-the-road man.Cope. Women find relationships preferable but most can't get one with who they actually want (Chad).
Wrong. OP is right. Women prefer to share the top men then enter a relationship with a middle-of-the-road man.
Top 20% theory is one of the pillars of the blackpill mate.Bluepilled.
Its heading to top 1% in urban areasTop 20% theory is one of the pillars of the blackpill mate.
How cucked is thatWomen need men for resources. If they didn't they would never agree to a relationship. They wouldn't have the need to.
It's getting there. That one recent tinder study has it at about top 17% right now.Its heading to top 1% in urban areas
How cucked is that
Top 20% theory is one of the pillars of the blackpill mate.
Nope. The woman's highest preference is sharing the Chad (multiple Chads ideally), because increasing her N-count increases her value as a woman. A woman has more value if she's fucked 10 chads as compared to if she's only fucked 3 chads. If she locks down one chad, she loses out on potential value.Yes and apparently you don't fully understand it, hence you're bluepilled. Just because women share the top 20 doesn't mean they'd prefer to be sharing them. Why the fuck would a woman prefer to share a man and his resources with other women? Like I said, they want relationships but only with Chad, but only top tier women can snag a Chad long-term, thus most of them settle for sharing him or getting pumped & dumped. Blackpill 101.
Nope. The woman's highest preference is sharing the Chad (multiple Chads ideally), because increasing her N-count increases her value as a woman. A woman has more value if she's fucked 10 chads as compared to if she's only fucked 3 chads.
Cope. Women find relationships preferable but most can't get one with who they actually want (Chad).
Sharing Chad means sharing resources. No woman wants to share resources. They optimally want full and exclusive access to said resources. Not being able to get a man to commit ensures that she can't have access to these resources.Nope. The woman's highest preference is sharing the Chad (multiple Chads ideally), because increasing her N-count increases her value as a woman. A woman has more value if she's fucked 10 chads as compared to if she's only fucked 3 chads. If she locks down one chad, she loses out on potential value.
Women are always looking for the next best deal even if they are "happy".you are deluded my dude.
i see constantly on dating app's beautiful woman that are 27+, sometimes even 35 that are looking for relationship.
how much "looking" can you possibly do? they are not really looking, its just for attention and validation
you are deluded my dude.
i see constantly on dating app's beautiful woman that are 27+, sometimes even 35 that are looking for relationship.
how much "looking" can you possibly do? they are not really looking, its just for attention and validation
Women need men for resources. If they didn't they would never agree to a relationship. They wouldn't have the need to.
Sharing Chad means sharing resources. No woman wants to share resources. They optimally want full and exclusive access to said resources. Not being able to get a man to commit ensures that she can't have access to these resources.
Potential betabuxxers she can string along via the possibility of sex.
Women can get all their resources require through a multitude of top 20% men as opposed from one man in the 21st century. They fill their emotional resource needs through orbiters and social media.Cope. Literally makes no sense from a biological standpoint.
They are looking for a relationship (especially at that age), it's just their ridiculous standards that prevent them from being in one. Some of you newcomers seem to be confused and still slightly bluepilled. I suggest you edumacate yourselves a little.
http://pillse.bol.ucla.edu/Publications/Pillsworth&Haselton_ARSR.pdf
Read that. The whole thing. It's a comprehensive blackpill study, and then when you've fully understood it (and only when you do) you can step back in the ring.
You're not looking at it from an evolutionary perspective. This wasn't always the case. Women originally needed men to survive. There wasn't a massive welfare state reallocating them goodies at men's expense.woman don't need men for resources. on median salaries woman outearn men, woman are less unemployed than men
also woman have the cream of the crop bullshit jobs like PR manager or Flower Stylist
Most men aren't going to commit resources to a woman that isn't theirs.Women can get all their resources require through a multitude of top 20% men as opposed from one man in the 21st century. They fill their emotional resource needs through orbiters and social media.
With us not chadwoman avoid relationships like fire
THIS.I think women are rly keen on relationships w/ chad or chadlite but the common idea that they "hook up w/ chad at every corner" is fucking stupid. MEN want to fuck everything, not women. BELIEVE me that they'd much rather practise abstinence than have sex with the hottest guy in the room if he's under 8/10
These girls marry a beta because they want to have that experience of having a wedding and being married, and make all the people who are asking, "When are you gonna get married??" finally shut up.
Women love being in relationships. They want to have a boyfriend at any time.