B
It's at least SOMETHING. Us low-value guys/incels/etc.... What are we liked for? What "one thing" can low-value men say people "only" like them for? Do most men have any privilege where they can say they are only desirable or pursued for one thing only that BENEFITS THEM FAIRLY?
The only thing we are "desired for" is being a cog; a worker drone; a background chatter or filler at best; a distraction. This BENEFITS US HOW?! We are not benefiting when our betters use as to grease the wheels, kill time, service others, and entertain/jester -- WE'D BE BENEFITING OTHERS. Women -- just by existing -- GET BENEFITS RIGHT FROM THAT FACT ALONE that most men only can dream of having & few live.
Girls, women, etc. and even guys follow along with the ideal that women are only liked for, "One thing," largely in part/reason for males being interested etc. Thing is, even if sex appeal is mostly what drives their privilege, and this BENEFITS THEM mostly, how is it bad for them then? It's like saying gold is only liked because it brings tons of money in. Okay, so is tons of money bad? Women only mostly liked or treated a certain way due to gender. But this BENEFITS THEM, right? They get more romance, sex, gifts, treatment, etc. What guys do you know that would complain about women betabuxxing them, chasing them, gifting them, orbiting them, falling over them constantly/loving & lusting after them, etc.?
But think about it: Wouldn't you prefer to be liked for "one thing" (which is bullshit) rather than not liked at all? Being known but disliked vs. discarded and invisible? Only girls talking to and pursuing you because of looks or just being undesirable cannon-fodder from womb-to-tomb?
I know I'd rather be liked "for one thing" than discarded from the world as useless by default. Hell, how many guys in general would love it if most women "only liked them for one thing" like sex. Sure, some guys seriously capitalize on that even from the opposite way as in, "Chad only liked for his looks," but overall it's pathetic. One thing to be liked for is bad? So you're telling me all women/girls/etc. would collectively be okay if suddenly they were treated like most males -- invisible, useless, no advantages in anything, no special treatment, nothing? Start at the bottom and grind for life to end up mostly at the bottom still, all while being sexually invisible too? How many girls do you know would prefer not being liked at all/have no privilege vs. being supposedly only "liked for one thing" (sex) as only a small number of guys can say they are more comparable/similar/privileged along the same lines as women (Chads, Gigachads, etc.)? Also, would you want to be an invisible turd forever or only liked because of LOOKS/gender? Which one do you think would make you happier: liked for one thing or hated for existing?
The only thing we are "desired for" is being a cog; a worker drone; a background chatter or filler at best; a distraction. This BENEFITS US HOW?! We are not benefiting when our betters use as to grease the wheels, kill time, service others, and entertain/jester -- WE'D BE BENEFITING OTHERS. Women -- just by existing -- GET BENEFITS RIGHT FROM THAT FACT ALONE that most men only can dream of having & few live.
Girls, women, etc. and even guys follow along with the ideal that women are only liked for, "One thing," largely in part/reason for males being interested etc. Thing is, even if sex appeal is mostly what drives their privilege, and this BENEFITS THEM mostly, how is it bad for them then? It's like saying gold is only liked because it brings tons of money in. Okay, so is tons of money bad? Women only mostly liked or treated a certain way due to gender. But this BENEFITS THEM, right? They get more romance, sex, gifts, treatment, etc. What guys do you know that would complain about women betabuxxing them, chasing them, gifting them, orbiting them, falling over them constantly/loving & lusting after them, etc.?
But think about it: Wouldn't you prefer to be liked for "one thing" (which is bullshit) rather than not liked at all? Being known but disliked vs. discarded and invisible? Only girls talking to and pursuing you because of looks or just being undesirable cannon-fodder from womb-to-tomb?
I know I'd rather be liked "for one thing" than discarded from the world as useless by default. Hell, how many guys in general would love it if most women "only liked them for one thing" like sex. Sure, some guys seriously capitalize on that even from the opposite way as in, "Chad only liked for his looks," but overall it's pathetic. One thing to be liked for is bad? So you're telling me all women/girls/etc. would collectively be okay if suddenly they were treated like most males -- invisible, useless, no advantages in anything, no special treatment, nothing? Start at the bottom and grind for life to end up mostly at the bottom still, all while being sexually invisible too? How many girls do you know would prefer not being liked at all/have no privilege vs. being supposedly only "liked for one thing" (sex) as only a small number of guys can say they are more comparable/similar/privileged along the same lines as women (Chads, Gigachads, etc.)? Also, would you want to be an invisible turd forever or only liked because of LOOKS/gender? Which one do you think would make you happier: liked for one thing or hated for existing?
Last edited:
