Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why do foids want to turn their countries into third world shit holes?

Wettinghose

Wettinghose

Major
★★★
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Posts
2,256
After all this Refugees welcome is pushed and supported by foids which makes no sense. On one hand they want refugees to come in but then rejected them aka Sjw on the streets and KKK in the sheets
 

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEefbbApuaE

They don't understand what they are doing

Most Pro Refugees Women are College/Uni educated

Most are women not men

If you look at Social Injustice movements in 1900s it was more equal distribution of gender

Now it's 65% + women
 
Last edited:
They go with whats popular
 
They will do anything that will get them attention. Foid brain.
 
After all this Refugees welcome is pushed and supported by foids which makes no sense. On one hand they want refugees to come in but then rejected them aka Sjw on the streets and KKK in the sheets
They want to tilt the sex ratio even more male-surplus situation in young and middle-aged age groups.

More males means increased competition and that benefits all women. Even the women who do not have asylum-seeker boyfriend benefit, because they can now have better quality local men than without the asylum-seekers.

Stop lying that all refugees get rejected. If 20% (the hottest fifth) of them find a GF within 1 year, that already has a big effect on displacing local below-average men. Consider for example that a town in Finland or Sweden with a population of 30 000 gets an influx of 500 asylum-seekers. That is already a big bad effect on local young men, because the asylum-seekers are almost all young men. So the effect on the sex ratio of 17-25 years old is big.
 
What do you mean, "it makes no sense"? It makes perfect sense. Just because they want refugees to seek refuge in their countries, doesn't mean they want to sleep with them. Why would they? Not to mention, refugee men are often married already. I would call it virtue signaling but then I realize that most natives are against refugees so that is not the case.
 
What do you mean, "it makes no sense"? It makes perfect sense. Just because they want refugees to seek refuge in their countries, doesn't mean they want to sleep with them. Why would they? Not to mention, refugee men are often married already. I would call it virtue signaling but then I realize that most natives are against refugees so that is not the case.
supposedly Sweden at least imported 80% male refugees most of which with no qualifications, HS diplomas, and no wives/gf. worsening their hypergamy even further
 
supposedly Sweden at least imported 80% male refugees most of which with no qualifications, HS diplomas, and no wives/gf. worsening their hypergamy even further
I had an ugly looking, gay South East Asian teacher in high school. He looked like a fish. He said that when he came to Sweden in the 1960s or 1970s, every girl wanted to be in a relationship with him because he was the only one who had black hair, dark eyes and tanned skin. Except he was, well, gay. My point is, the women there have always been "progressive." So it makes sense that Sweden has the reputation it has among right-wingers.
 
Because they crave dark triad men, which MENA and Africa are filled with
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top