Soy Why can't Inceltears users detect sarcasm?

[Deleted member 11159]

I'm genuinely curious. Whenever one of them forgets to add "/s" they get downvoted to shit even though it's still obvious they're being sarcastic. Is this a form of retardation?

Sometimes the "/s" isn't enough so they have to resort to this:

 

[Hunter]

theyre all autists

 

[PersonalityChad]

Autism

 

[Void]

They are like zombies that attack everything incel related lmao.

 

[Henry de Montherlant]

People who can't detect sarcasm without a fucking code indicating them obvious "/sSSSssarcasm" should be sedated (no sarcasm lol).

 

[Pariah]

Autism and SJW trait.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

SJWs need to get offended by as many things as possible.

 

[blickpall]

Because it suits their agenda to get triggered unquestioningly.

 

[Existentialcel]

Sarcasm requires a level of intelligence to comprehend

 

[Deleted member 10124]

They are like zombies that attack everything incel related lmao.

SJWs need to get offended by as many things as possible.

People who can't detect sarcasm without a fucking code indicating them obvious "/sSSSssarcasm" should be sedated (no sarcasm lol).

Because it suits their agenda to get triggered unquestioningly.

Sarcasm requires a level of intelligence to comprehend

 

[cope_over_rope]

If there's even any wisp of a scintilla of a suggestion they are diverging from the narrow moral consensus of the subreddit's userbase then they will be dogpiled and marked as suspect. Their status is heavily pegged (just like their asses -- HIYO!) to having "the right" opinions and fitting in with what they regard as right-thinking people.

Also explains why they can never entertain the possibility that posters here are sometimes being sarcastic; exaggerating for comic effect; LARPing; displaying self-awareness or self-deprecation; and/or playing into or having fun with the stereotypes and culture of the board. To do so would introduce too many shades of grey that their Manichean worldview can't handle, and would also be like treating us as complex and self-contradictory (i.e. as humans) rather than as the 2d targets of a moral e-panic.

Tbh.

TLDR: They are unintelligent and unimaginative conformists.

 

[Mickeyonacid]

It's because they're fucking retarded.

 

[Deleted member 11159]

If there's even any wisp of a scintilla of a suggestion they are diverging from the narrow moral consensus of the subreddit's userbase then they will be dogpiled and marked as suspect. Their status is heavily pegged (just like their asses -- HIYO!) to having "the right" opinions and fitting in with what they regard as right-thinking people.

Also explains why they can never entertain the possibility that posters here are sometimes being sarcastic; exaggerating for comic effect; LARPing; displaying self-awareness or self-deprecation; and/or playing into or having fun with the stereotypes and culture of the board. To do so would introduce too many shades of grey that their Manichean worldview can't handle, and would also be like treating us as complex and self-contradictory (i.e. as humans) rather than as the 2d targets of a moral e-panic.

Tbh.

TLDR: They are unintelligent and unimaginative conformists.

Makes sense

 

[Newbite]

They have shit for brains

 

[Angus13]

I think they do this shit on purpose, we live in a degenerate, dumbed down society. They think if they win the argument that automatically makes them right, even if they have to cheat. Or even if they loose the argument but they have the numbers on their side, in their mind, they "won." So it's basically a blue-pill defensive tactic. If they can twist of misinterpret your words, they can make you say what they want you to say, and attack what they want you to say, rather than what you are actually saying. That way they can walk away looking like a winner.

 

[VST]

I'm genuinely curious. Whenever one of them forgets to add "/s" they get downvoted to shit even though it's still obvious they're being sarcastic. Is this a form of retardation?

Sometimes the "/s" isn't enough so they have to resort to this:

Soytism.

 

[Solitarian_Walker]

Women are incapable of understanding sarcasm or humor. They are all autistic in that way. The few men there are feminized and autistic.

 

[PersonalityChad]

If there's even any wisp of a scintilla of a suggestion they are diverging from the narrow moral consensus of the subreddit's userbase then they will be dogpiled and marked as suspect. Their status is heavily pegged (just like their asses -- HIYO!) to having "the right" opinions and fitting in with what they regard as right-thinking people.

Also explains why they can never entertain the possibility that posters here are sometimes being sarcastic; exaggerating for comic effect; LARPing; displaying self-awareness or self-deprecation; and/or playing into or having fun with the stereotypes and culture of the board. To do so would introduce too many shades of grey that their Manichean worldview can't handle, and would also be like treating us as complex and self-contradictory (i.e. as humans) rather than as the 2d targets of a moral e-panic.

Tbh.

TLDR: They are unintelligent and unimaginative conformists.

Really good post.