FEMCELS
DON'T
EXIST
DON'T
EXIST
As many posters will say, No handsome man will give her attention.
Femcels, everybody
the meme gender
the meme gender
D
IMO "femcel" = "female celibate" and "mancel" = "man celibate".
"in" is completely dropped so why should that be assumed? Plus there is no such thing as absolute inceldom / absolute volceldom. There's a spectrum.
Women just happen to fall much more towards the voluntary side of the spectrum compared to men.
P
These femcels have fuck buddies they are NOT celibate
Depends on which version of celibate you mean. Our earliest (1730s) usage by Antoine Banier refers to marriage rather than sex:
"How many young Women who groan under the Yoke of involuntary Celibacy, would find Husbands to make them happy"
Supposedly there was a correlation (because such unmarried women of the time were OF COURSE assumed to be 100% virgins) but it clearly has it's roots in referring to marriage.
So there could be solid etymology grounds for femcels co-opting the term to refer to their emceldom/spinsterhood regardless of having a cock in her every day
P
The version of celibate I mean is sex. These chicks fuck around. They might take a week off during thier period but not long periods of time.
This. She literally does not register the hordes of satellite males vying for her attention.
assuming she’s not obese. If she is, she’s actually not trying at all and is stupid to wonder why she can’t get a boyfriend.
No square/ protruding jaw/maxilla, hunter eyed, full head of hair, NT, 6 ft plus man (7/10 plus) has hit on meeeee (a 2-6/10)!!! Oh my gosh where have all the good men gone
D
She needs to log in on Tinder and she wil find at least 100 guys willing to be her boyfriend
Hell even here we have guys saying it's not incel if you're paying for sex, not incel if you're getting cucked, etc.
P
I'm not sure about the cucked part but the paying part is stupid. Anyone can pay for sex except for uberpoorcels
Every femcel is a fucking ugly landwhale. And I'm not saying that they won't get sex. There are bluepilled simps, cucks, soys and male feminists ready to fuck them. But femcels don't want them. She wants a 10/10 gigachad with blue eyes and lean body. And those kind of men are busy fucking Stacies and don't have time for ugly landwhales.
But that still moves the needle from 'sex' to 'sex without compensation'.
Except even if you don't pay a hooker, guys who date foids often compensate them in some way anyway (buying dinner for example) so it's still whoring
P
That's dumb, even Chad pays for dates. The girl could choose tons of guys to go on a date with and she chose you. Plus, there's no guarantee she's gonna have sex with you on the date. The fact is with a hooker it's straightforward cash to sex. There is a difference.
Chad will pay for a date with Stacy or Gigastacy, but he does not need to pay for them to get with Becky.
Hookers can also choose who they want to fuck.
Girls can choose lots of guys to date, but a smaller amount of them will be willing to pay her half of the tab.
I'm not seeing how the lack of guarantee of sex is meaningful here. It's basically similar to escorts: sex for cash is not explicits but it is implied in the long run and the relationship will end if it doesn't happen unless you're utterly enthralled.
P
Because ANY GUY can get an escort. ANY GUY. LITERALLY ANY GUY IF HE HAS THE MONEY. Not every guy can get laid through dating even if he pays. That's the difference
They get led on by chads on tinder for pump and dump. "Femcel"
Download tinder and get a treadmill u dumb bitch
Imagine living a life on tutorial mode and still failing
Not literally any guy: high-end escorts and hookers do turn guys down.
Obviously some foids need to be dined with more expensive 500-dollar meals and be bought 2000 dollar jewelry before they fuck their sugar daddy but they're still whores.
P
you're talking some hookers. But if a guy looks around enough, there will be SOME hooker who won't turn him down
yes, and if a guy looks around enough, there will be SOME foid who won't turn him down for "free" sex which just so happens to give her non-monetary benefits like a male bodyguard. They're still getting compensation in exchange for sex.
P
No you're wrong, not every guy is able to get sex the "free" way like being a male bodyguard or taking her on dates. This is where you're wrong. There are guys who the ONLY WAY they get laid is paying. Like LITERALLY THE ONLY WAY.
You can't bodyguard if you lack the size to play that role, obviously.
It's all about what you have to barter.
Just like guys without cash can't afford enough for a hooker.
Sizecel, wealthcel, etc.
My point is basically: whatever amount of money you could directly pay for sex, some pseudohooker will take that money indirectly (like a meal) and fuck you.
Hookers tend to be more efficient with their time, so if a foid is spending a lot of time leading up to that sex (not to mention the RP scenario of it not being prostitution) then she's obviously going to need more material rewards to give the sex.
IE the value of your time as a bodyguard would need to add up a lot.
Like think if you got paid 15/hour to accompany a foid, and a blowjob costs 300, you literally need to spend 20 cumulative hours orbiting her to get that BJ.
Except transactionally, you are also getting her as an escort during that time, so she will subtract that fee. so if she values her time to you at 14/hour then you only earn 1/hour net and must spend 300 hours orbiting her to get that blowjob.
If you go on 3-hour dates once per week, that's 100 weeks (2 years) of dating.
Meanwhile, she could swap you out for another guy at any time to avoid paying that debt
P
No, WRONG. A guy who's a 2/10 will not get a date with a woman. He simply will not. He needs to go to a hooker.
Please give an example, we might have different ideas of what a 2 is.
I think that inevitably what I would call a 'covert hooker' would "date" him.
IE acompany him but not actually fuck him unless he put in such a ridiculous amount of resources that a hooker would be cheaper.
P
Please give an example, we might have different ideas of what a 2 is.
I think that inevitably what I would call a 'covert hooker' would "date" him.
IE acompany him but not actually fuck him unless he put in such a ridiculous amount of resources that a hooker would be cheaper.
That guy won the lottery you know. And before you say "she's 'dating' him" That's because HE WON THE LOTTERY!!!!!! THAT"S AN EXTREME OUTLIER.
Any 2/10 guy WHO DOESN'T WIN THE LOTTERY CANNOT GET A DATE.
This would be instantly solved for any woman over 18 by simply installing tinder or going to a club.
Femcels can only exist below 18.
Femcels can only exist below 18.
Teehee i only want chad to approach me
Incorrect, a 2/10 guy who is rich for other reasons (like inheriting the wealth) could also get one.
I bet she's still had sex at least, she could find someone anyway if she made a tiny amount of effort.
Based
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
