they lack visuo-spatial skills
Y
@PPEcel remember when Larry Summers was widely criticized for pointing this out?
Men and Women, Different but Equal: What's the Problem?
tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com
cope
women have the edge mentaly in the first 18 years life, then men become men and pull ahead.
But many men are so truamatuzed by their childhood they can't take advantager of the fact that their now better than women
But many men are so truamatuzed by their childhood they can't take advantager of the fact that their now better than women
they're too busy looking at their chad maths teachers who are all male
no，most math teachers are glasswearing soys，if they were chads，their performance would skyrocketthey're too busy looking at their chad maths teachers who are all male
You have to be low iq in math if feminist statistics make sense to you.
I don't even know if I should call OP math since we're talking basic counting here.
because most maths teachers are ugly，if they had a gigachad teacher，their performance would shock the country
Inferior gender
Y
This will be a long day.
Off-Topic Logic Game
Off-Topic Logic Game
| Unintelligent_Anon Join Date: 2016-02-24 Post Count: 361 | #185501144Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:07 PM CDT Greetings, Off-Topic. On this particular occasion, I have decided to have an entertaining discussion with all of you by composing a simple game based on logical-reasoning. Firstly, while utilizing mathematics, we have objective statements such as "x = 5" Those particular type of statements are properly known as "predicates", given that they equate to either the Boolean values of true and/or false. within the above premise, it merely defines the quantity that variable 'x' represents. Therefore, it is "true" predicate. Although I used "x = 5", we could use symbolic notation such as this: E(x) = 5 Where uppercase "E" refers to the word "Equal", and the input variable 'x' receives the quantity described on the opposite side of the "=" operand. --------------------------------------- Recognizing the above objective explanation, the goal of the game is rather basic: to derive logical expressions to be interpreted by other users. I have devised a minimal list of logical symbols below: "-->" - The logical "if-then" operator. "If certain cookies are delicious, then some grapes are bluish"(Note that the premise predicate and the conclusion predicate do not necessarily need to be related. They merely need to have an obtainable Boolean value. '~' - The logical "NOT" operator. It merely negates "true"/"false" Boolean predicates into the opposite Boolean value. ~"I decided to traverse the area" becomes "I decided not to traverse the area." "^" - The logical AND operator. "(1+1 = 2) ^ (2 + 2 = 4) --> (5 + 5) == 10", which is true, given that "1 + 1 = 2 ^ 2 + 2 = 4" are both (true ^ true) respectively. Disregarding all of the other logical operators for the current moment, this is a sample expression that I have devised below: Suppose that we have variables 'a' and 'b': a = 100 b = 50 Firstly, let us define a predicate to determine whether the first value is a factor of the second value: R(a,b) = (a % b) This will retrieve the remainder of the division operation "a/b", using the difference between 'a' and 'b' as a referent. Likewise, R(b,a) would also retrieve the remainder of the division operation "b/a", using the difference between 'b' and 'a' as a referent. If I had an expression such as this: (R(a,b) = 0) ^ (R(b,a) = 0) It would be an expected case of a true/false pair. This is due to the mere fact that the (100 % 50) does not have a remainder, whereas (50/100) does indeed have a remainder of fifty itself. Hopefully the above descriptions provides a rather wholesome and otherwise precise discussion involving mathematical logic. |
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Re: Performing math on tables
| AnonyAnonymous Join Date: 2013-06-23 Post Count: 6332 | #184107348Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:28 PM CST "I don't get any errors it just doesn't do the math" Okay. Please provide the modified version of your script. |
Re: Suggest stuff to be added to an advanced math library
| UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 | #184100772Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:48 PM CST Please provide us with more details regarding your "advanced math" library. Which branch are you referring to? |
Re: I'm catching feelings for an 8th grader
| ||
Re: how do i get a message about going through a hard time
|
Binary Sequences Discussion Thread
|
| ParadigmaticAnon Join Date: 2016-01-25 Post Count: 182 | #183484734Friday, February 12, 2016 11:01 PM CST Well then, I suppose that a computational example will garner interest. Computers utilize binary sequences to store data. Each bit represents a specific instruction to be manipulated by components of the CPU. This is accomplished by utilizing "0" and "1" to represent separate voltage states of a given segment of the hardware. "0" refers to low-voltage, and "1" refers to high-voltage. Thus, imagine a sequence such as "01010101" as merely representing the computer sequentially reversing the voltage states of various signals within hardware gates. Each gate represents the basic logical operations of AND, OR, NOT, XOR. Perhaps this will interest fellow users? |
| ParadigmaticAnon Join Date: 2016-01-25 Post Count: 182 | #183519765Saturday, February 13, 2016 12:37 PM CST I have developed another explanation for the users on the sub-section. Suppose that we a machine containing six buttons. Each button can be successively activated/deactivated using a sequence of instructions. Each "button press" will reverse the button's current state. We can express this as a binary sequence of six bits. This will be our representation: 000111 In the above sequence for our machine, the first three buttons are deactivated. The last remaining three buttons are active. Naturally, since we are working directly with base-two, we can utilize logical operations to modify the behavior of the individual bits. Let us define a function "P", which will represent each unique button press. Imagine that function "P" accepts an input "positional value", and signals a state change to the bit of that position. This would be our notation to use the sequence(Assuming that lowercase "p" refers to the position within the address and uppercase "B" refers to the actual memory address itself): P(p) = ~B[p] The "~"(Or logical NOT) operator merely reverses the numerical value of the bit found. In non base-two context, this would reverse "true" to false, and "false" to true. Since base-two has only two valid digits, 0 and/or 1, this operator will likewise reverse 0 to 1 and 1 to 0. Since our machine has six button, the function will need to be executed exactly six times to affect every digit. Given that our original sequence was "000111", this is how it would be altered: P(1) = 1 P(2) = 1 P(3) = 1 P(4) = 0 P(5) = 0 P(6) = 0 Altogether, the new button sequence would be "111000." Notice how the values of both sets of halves of the button sequence was swapped. Consequently, the first three buttons are activated. The last remaining three buttons are not. |
Re: Off-Topic Custom Mathematical Functions Game
| Unintelligent_Anon Join Date: 2016-02-24 Post Count: 361 | #185065803Wednesday, March 09, 2016 8:06 PM CST "you'd be better off posting this on your math teacher's twitter page" Currently, I am not enrolled in any "abstract" undergraduate courses, due to health reasons. Thus, ROBLOX is the preferred website for mathematical experimentation. Surely you enjoy creating your own mathematical functions also? |
| ||
|
| Unintelligent_Anon Join Date: 2016-02-24 Post Count: 361 | #190223267Wednesday, June 01, 2016 6:29 AM CDT "they make you learn stuff as if youre fresh from the pile such as print, variables, math, etc" "if you give a man a fish, he is hungry again in an hour. If you teach him to catch a fish, you do him a good turn" As this is a community consisting of adolescent schoolchildren with mostly little academic knowledge, providing methods to metaphorically "catch a fish," or solve simple mathematical problems, is an efficient technique for properly educating inexperienced users. |
Re: Poll: Are U Good At Maths?
| Subjective_Anon Join Date: 2016-03-08 Post Count: 157 | #200236802Monday, October 17, 2016 1:58 PM CDT You should define "Maths." There are Geometric Maths, Algebraic Maths, et cetera. Also, the person who stated that "You should learn proper spelling and grammar before studying Maths" is an imbecile who should learn the definition of Ad-Hominem. |
it takes work
regardless of gender, I think, these days at least:
most people are shit at math
most people are functionally illiterate
regardless of gender, I think, these days at least:
most people are shit at math
most people are functionally illiterate
Re: What is Vector2 and Vector3?
| ||
Re: What is Vector2 and Vector3?
|
Re: Get Local Mouse Position?
| ||
Re: Randomized rotation
| ||
Re: Randomized rotation
| ||
Re: Must be misunderstanding
| ||
Re: Something simple...
| ||
Re: what would I need to know and do to make a gun work
|
Re: How would I make a Partmove?
| ||
Re: Teleport All Players To Map
|
Re: How to make something rotate over time?
| AnonyAnonymous Join Date: 2013-06-23 Post Count: 6332 | #139513914Monday, July 07, 2014 2:48 AM CDT Alright, an example would be, Rotation uses Vector3, an example would be, Part.Rotation = Vector3.new(XAxisNumbHere,YAxisNumberHere,ZAxisNumberHere) |
Re: How would I make a model travel on a designated path?
| ||
Re: Help please
|
| AnonyAnonymous Join Date: 2013-06-23 Post Count: 6332 | #139300703Saturday, July 05, 2014 4:11 AM CDT If it's a model and assuming you have everything already welded together then I would suggest using the :MoveTo() Vector3 method. |
| AnonyAnonymous Join Date: 2013-06-23 Post Count: 6332 | #139204654Friday, July 04, 2014 6:50 AM CDT Alternatively, you could rotate the hat in studio and get the Vector3 Rotation Value from it's properties and use that within the script. |
It Is Truly Difficult To Live With Such An Enormous IQ
| Moronism Join Date: 2010-02-08 Post Count: 451 | #183567345Saturday, February 13, 2016 11:26 PM CST Hello adolescent schoolchildren. Lately, I have explored the territory surrounding my place of dwelling. And during each individual expedition, I noted the magnificent geometrical patterns throughout nature. The mere nodes of a single leaf bind together to form often semi-curved yet white, "embedded" lines. It is beautiful. Upon returning home, I thought excessively about the situation. And then I came to a horrid and unfortunate realization: The vast majority of civilians are incapable of recognizing simple mathematical patterns within nature. I was repulsed by that truthful realization. Mathematics is one of the fundamental components of abstraction. Recognizing the connection of concepts via mathematical knowledge is imperative to understanding the functionality of a system. Basic Calculus describes sequences. Yet, individuals of average intelligence cannot understand simple abstraction without a calculator(And calculators focus only on blatant computation, as computers are computational devices), which they can very rarely utilize efficiently. It is horrible. Nevertheless, returning to the main subject itself, I often displace myself to my local library to review scientific/mathematical books, and determine whether they are fit to be replenished within the finite collection. After analysis, I subsequently inform the menial laborers of my decision. It frequently baffles me that individuals such as Gilbert Strang(Who feigns supposed knowledge of basic Linear Algebra principles) are glorified by the employees there. Gilbert lacks sufficient knowledge of the subject he is speaking about. As does the majority of MIT instructors. They are novices who have gained supposed "credibility" via media manipulation. Linear Algebra is much more abstractly-concrete and fundamental than what Gilbert or his colleagues can convey it to be. Strang's "Linear Algebra" is successful only because of pseudo-pedagogy. Allow me to elaborate in a much more humble manner: I have attained exactly 157 IQ units. My spatial-reasoning greatly exceeds that of the typical individual, and this is evident by the many physics engines that I constructed on Unix-based systems using only C and SDL as my available utility tool. Yet, my proficiency in geometrical/trigonometrical manipulation is a mere thousandth of my overall capabilities. On various occasions, I have also solved many abstract, post-PhD level problems within the ranges of number-theory/model-theory. It is often distressing to visit Internet forums to discuss my intelligence level, given that reference to basic philosophical principles quickly confuses those who have a lower IQ than I. Strangely enough, those same individuals cannot comprehend basic vocabulary words, and they frequently mention the use of a dictionary and/or thesaurus. Why, a dictionary and/or thesaurus is redundant to understand such simplistic terminology. Well, I suppose that I should continue development of my memory-storage algorithm. I intend to simulate OS functionality using RBX.Lua, which should be relatively easy using modules. I can only hope that society stops patronizing individuals such as myself because of our superior intelligence. It is truly terrible. |
Re: Simple Algebra Discussion
| ||
Re: Simple Algebra Discussion
|
They math mogged me to death back in school, everyone did
Last edited:
Females are shit at everything that is objectively measurable.
D
Their brains are better at language and communication.
Because math requires a modicum of intelligence.
have you studied laplace's formula?
Difficult to say.
Re: Think of ANY OBJECT
| UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 | #185718520Sunday, March 20, 2016 12:41 PM CDT Boolean rings are the preferred item. |
rightoDifficult to say.
Re: Think of ANY OBJECT
UnsourcedAnon
Join Date: 2016-01-12
Post Count: 563#185718520Sunday, March 20, 2016 12:41 PM CDT
Boolean rings are the preferred item.
Hmm.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
