Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why are the West and Russia/China helping Third World countries?

Anarcho Nihilist

Anarcho Nihilist

Generalfeldmarschall
★★★★
Joined
Jul 12, 2024
Posts
3,837
The third world (Most of the countries of Africa, Latin America, and Asia) are not capable of loyalty or alliance, they will be with those who offer them more money. The West and the USSR invested a lot of money in the third world in an attempt to win them over, but in the end they got nothing. The Third world is unscrupulous, it will only do what is beneficial to it.
 
Idk. To use their resources they don't have the IQ to utilize themselves.
 
How much did the United States give to backward countries through USAID and could this money be converted into defending the political interests of the United States?
 
The whites had their chance in Rhodesia and SA.

War is a technology and economy builder. The USAID concept of using peaceful means to stimulate economic activity seems like a total failure full of grift.
 
The US is discontinuing the aid now.
 
To at some point take them over I'd guess
 
The US is discontinuing the aid now.
Literally the only sensible action of Elon Musk and Doge. What's the point of giving money to projects in the Middle East, Africa or Asia, anyway it won't bring any reverse benefit.
 
Literally the only sensible action of Elon Musk and Doge. What's the point of giving money to projects in the Middle East, Africa or Asia, anyway it won't bring any reverse benefit.
There were plenty of other sensible things DOGE did. Like cutting useless federal workers.
 
To at some point take them over I'd guess
Local elites will simply steal all the aid from the USAID program, this will not increase the influence of the United States on the world stage, but simply give corrupt elites from the third world an opportunity to line their pockets.
 
No such thing as help in politics
 
The third world (Most of the countries of Africa, Latin America, and Asia) are not capable of loyalty or alliance, they will be with those who offer them more money. The West and the USSR invested a lot of money in the third world in an attempt to win them over, but in the end they got nothing. The Third world is unscrupulous, it will only do what is beneficial to it.
Geopolitics
 
No such thing as help in politics
Yes, but, but the US aid is relatively gratuitous, while China rigidly demands a refund for its assistance with interest.
 
to create more shitskins to replace whites when they eventually migrate to the west
 
The west doesn't allow third world countries to have their free industrial production of weapons, technology, agriculture etc that is why they took Saddam Hussein down by claiming that he has weapons of destruction. It wants them to be always related to their global companies as consumers. If third countries get free from western economical control, they will become a super power that threat the west.
 
The west doesn't allow third world countries to have their free industrial production of weapons, technology, agriculture etc that is why they took Saddam Hussein down by claiming that he has weapons of destruction. It wants them to be always related to their global companies as consumers. If third countries get free from western economical control, they will become a super power that threat the west.
Didn't the West make a superpower out of poor, hungry China simply by sending factories there, thereby giving China investments and the opportunity to steal technology? Today, the West is transporting production to Vietnam, India and other third world countries, simply because it wants to weaken China a little. If it weren't for the West, the Chinese would still be killing sparrows with slingshots and starving to death.The West (or rather corporations and elites) sacrificed their Western middle class to globalization.
 
The west doesn't allow third world countries to have their free industrial production of weapons, technology, agriculture etc that is why they took Saddam Hussein down by claiming that he has weapons of destruction. It wants them to be always related to their global companies as consumers. If third countries get free from western economical control, they will become a super power that threat the west.
Saddam was overthrown solely because the Jews considered him a threat, because he had an unpredictable character.
 
The third world (Most of the countries of Africa, Latin America, and Asia) are not capable of loyalty or alliance, they will be with those who offer them more money. The West and the USSR invested a lot of money in the third world in an attempt to win them over, but in the end they got nothing. The Third world is unscrupulous, it will only do what is beneficial to it.
The purpose of aid is to subordinate third world countries and discourage their governments from opposing the interests of the great powers. It's basically bribes to the governments of third world countries to get full access to their resources and markets without interference.
 
The purpose of aid is to subordinate third world countries and discourage their governments from opposing the interests of the great powers. It's basically bribes to the governments of third world countries to get full access to their resources and markets without interference.
Yes, but does it make sense to make any deals with those elites who are sold for money and, if anything, will betray you for the sake of the one who pays the most?
 
Local elites will simply steal all the aid from the USAID program, this will not increase the influence of the United States on the world stage, but simply give corrupt elites from the third world an opportunity to line their pockets.
The question concerned Russia and China not the US
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top