Pinpoint
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2018
- Posts
- 6,717
They practically talk about slavs being the curries of the white race so I am curious what is the reason most of them are bald. Since that seems to be a signature trait about them.
I mean in proportion to their sexual market value. Not that they're equal. Yes the redeeming thing abt indians is the hair.Idk but many curries are blessed with great hair actually.
Yes and low inhib. Sorry for getting off topic btwI mean in proportion to their sexual market value. Not that they're equal. Yes the redeeming thing abt indians is the hair.
Alcohol too. I know for fact hair loss on the hands is caused by nerve damage such as from alcoholism, so logically other hair including head hair may be affected as well. & Slavs of course are notorious degenerate drunks.Crap diet.
how many generations do you think it takes for epigenetics to set in and cause balding?Yes and low inhib. Sorry for getting off topic btw
Alcohol too. I know for fact hair loss on the hands is caused by nerve damage such as from alcoholism, so logically other hair including head hair may be affected as well. & Slavs of course are notorious degenerate drunks.
We are talking about the bald ones; the properties/ patterns behind the reason they are balding. So we are just looking for the reasoning why in proportion to wasp whites they are so unclean and scumAgain, eastern "slavs" aka Russian mongoloid scum and turkic Ukrainians don't represent the european slavic linguistic group.
Right, we're talking about russians, not European Slavs.We are talking about the bald ones; the properties/ patterns behind the reason they are balding. So we are just looking for the reasoning why in proportion to wasp whites they are so unclean and scum
I'm not an evolution wiz, but I imagine it happened a very long time ago and that particular genetic markers by race etc. are here to stay for a long time also.how many generations do you think it takes for epigenetics to set in and cause balding?
How many generational degradations does it take to show that visibly I mean.
I wonder if Islam forbidding alochol actually helped the arabs gain more hair. But at the same time there's a lot of baldcel arabs too.
Again, eastern "slavs" aka Russian mongoloid scum and turkic Ukrainians don't represent the european slavic linguistic group.
Right, we're talking about russians, not European Slavs.
Anyone who thinks curries/arabs and Slovenes, Croats, Slovaks, Czechs are on the same level is delusional. European Slavs gigamog all ethnics, no exception. These groups are about as bald on average as Germanics.
Slavs are nothing more than a linguistic group. People use Russian and Slav interchangeably which is the only thing that bothers me with posts like OP's and discussion about "slavs" in general.True about "Russians", but genetically Ukrainians and Poles are the same people. Ukrainians are just Poles who trusted Kikes, and now are poorer than Nigerians
Slovenes, Czech, Croats are Celts and Germanics larping as slavs. Poles are 100% Slavic like Southern Russians.
View attachment 126123
@Eskimocel it is fucking overAgain, eastern "slavs" aka Russian mongoloid scum and turkic Ukrainians don't represent the european slavic linguistic group.
Lol, wut? It is like 1/10 men in my country if you check people on the street. I have no problems with hair at all. My father is 52 and he wears metallhead hair for all his life. I start to think people think that """"slavs"""" is eastern nations of Russian Federation of something because Russia is multicultural.They practically talk about slavs being the curries of the white race so I am curious what is the reason most of them are bald. Since that seems to be a signature trait about them.
Cope@Eskimocel it is fucking over
Do you live in Ukraine? No? Ok then. Every single mongoloid I have seen comes from the conquered part of what is now present day Russia. Russians were part of the once called Kievan Rus. There was no Russia which originally takes its name from that empire.Again, eastern "slavs" aka Russian mongoloid scum and turkic Ukrainians don't represent the european slavic linguistic group.
I want to fix something here, Kievan Rus is formed by rus' tribe and they were swedish vikings conquered the north russia, then ukraine.Cope
Do you live in Ukraine? No? Ok then. Every single mongoloid I have seen comes from the conquered part of what is now present day Russia. Russians were part of the once called Kievan Rus. There was no Russia which originally takes its name from that empire.
Basically in the 10th century the east slavs (present day ukranians) colonized nearby countries and United them into a big country called Kievan Rus (which is where current Russia has its name from)
It conquered up to Finland and all of present EE.
Russians basically were from there. And since most of them lived in Moscow the Mongolians had the most impact on them since it was closer to them
While Kiev remained basically safe since it was the mainpoint and is now the capital of Ukraine
And the country ran on paganism(sweden) and christianity.
Since we had a swedish prince run the country at one point. Hence why Ukrainians are actually blondes. one if my parents is blonde while the other has blue eyes
And ofc now the Capital is called Kiev. Which literally comes from that first country I said at the top. Which was a ukranian country.
Neither Russians are mongols or Ukrainians. Or in fact any slavic person. But yes the now modern day Russians got screwed by mongol genetics. The best person I can name right now is @Weed since he is blonde with I forgot whatever eye color he had. He has had minimal mongoloid mixture if not at all since he kept his blonde hair.
Don't lump them in with the Turks either. Because tatar population is extremely minimal in Ukraine and the largest is in Russia with roughly 5 million. Certain parts of Ukraine simply adopted Turkish culture(not dna) and certain parts of Islam to develop a strict traditionalist country.
And aside from christianity we ran on paganism and had Vikings. And a huge nordic population with slavic males. Which was way bigger than tatar and mongol mixing which barely impacted the Ukrainians
In fact. Russians and Ukrainian or any person in a slavic country shouldn't think they are different from nordic. Only now (present day Russian land. Former kievany rus land was taken over by mongols) which Russian land back then was just viking run land by Scandinavians(vikings) and slavs. And the mongols attacked from there. Hence why WE have a low population of tatars and mongols. And the biggest tatar population is in Russia. But yes. You are correctI want to fix something here, Kievan Rus is formed by rus' tribe and they were swedish vikings conquered the north russia, then ukraine.
And yes, northern Europeans make up genetics of Ukrainians and Russians
even russians are indistinguishable from swedesAgain, eastern "slavs" aka Russian mongoloid scum and turkic Ukrainians don't represent the european slavic linguistic group.