I'm sure most of you have observed this personally in your everyday life if you've kept up with the "hot girls" you knew from junior high or even just looking at photos of the adult couples you know from the olden days vs now and what have you, but on average from a looks standpoint, men usually age better than women (assuming of course they keep their weight down and don't destroy themselves with drugs).
From an evolutionary standpoint this makes sense -- women have a fertility window within which they are desperately sought after. Men of all ages desperately want to fuck and have relationships with young fertile looking women. This is not so when it comes to men who are never desperately sought after and aren't really considered more attractive in their teens/early 20s than say their 30s (provided again that they don't abuse drugs and keep their weight down). Of course eventually everyone grows old to a point that their looks hugely deteriorate but its not uncommon for men in their early 50s to still look pretty decent whereas that is almost never true the other way around (it "can" be so, but on average I mean).
If you follow actors and look up young vs today pictures, this difference becomes apparent very quickly for example. Yes, some men age like garbage too and some women age gracefully (which is what so many cling to to "prove" this disparity isn't real), but on average it seems rather plain to see the difference in action and considering the way we evolved (men can have children til a much older age than women and women's looks coincide with their fertility window after which point attracting men for sex would no longer be needed). Whenever I go to look up hotties from old tv shows and movies usually today the men from said shows look much much better while the women look ... frankly horrible. What prompted this was my recent watch of Twin Peaks -- my lord did those hotties not age well while the men on average look noticeably more well put together all these years later, but of course that's just a small snippet/a single example which needs to be combined with others to form this conclusion and all that.
I just honestly don't get how so many people are in denial about this -- women, I guess I can understand since the truth hurts on this front, but men? Surely men have eyes and the ability to observe patterns no?
And of course you're called a """"""misogynist"""""" for acknowledging this based on your own two eyes. You know because women's looks holding up horribly in reality is because of the patriarchy or some bullshit. I dunno man, I really just wish more people were willing and able to accept things as they are instead of just believing whatever suits them.
What I wonder is, when women are young do they think they're invincible? They're hot shit and they know they're hot shit/highly desirable so they take advantage of it and live large without thinking realistically on the future. Seems to me a woman's best bet for the long term is when they're within that 18-25 range, find the highest value most Chad guy you can land (or just pick a decent looking fellow in med school or comp sci/engineering or some such) then get him to marry you. Boom, your life is now on easy mode and you'll be provided for assuming you have sex with him and don't get fat.
Men on the other hand? Most men cannot get sex easily -- a lot of men try to compete with each other and to build wealth/get a good job/reasonable status so that they can get a woman to commit to them, ideally a woman in this optimal age range who still looks fertile since that's what men find attractive. It's just interesting to think on the differences and I have to say, the male route is obviously much much harder despite what everyone is told. If you're even an average looking woman and you're willing to settle on the looks front, you can usually find some Uni student who's not the best looking guy in a good field who wants to have kids and wammo, you get to stay at home watching netflix all day with your kid or two while the dude goes out a wage slaves for you. Unhappy later? The woman can just divorce rape you and loses nothing.
The thing that grinds my gears is, nothing I'm saying here is untrue, but speaking the truth when its critical of women or reflects them in a privileged light is a big no-no in western countries because we have a lot of fucking retards.
From an evolutionary standpoint this makes sense -- women have a fertility window within which they are desperately sought after. Men of all ages desperately want to fuck and have relationships with young fertile looking women. This is not so when it comes to men who are never desperately sought after and aren't really considered more attractive in their teens/early 20s than say their 30s (provided again that they don't abuse drugs and keep their weight down). Of course eventually everyone grows old to a point that their looks hugely deteriorate but its not uncommon for men in their early 50s to still look pretty decent whereas that is almost never true the other way around (it "can" be so, but on average I mean).
If you follow actors and look up young vs today pictures, this difference becomes apparent very quickly for example. Yes, some men age like garbage too and some women age gracefully (which is what so many cling to to "prove" this disparity isn't real), but on average it seems rather plain to see the difference in action and considering the way we evolved (men can have children til a much older age than women and women's looks coincide with their fertility window after which point attracting men for sex would no longer be needed). Whenever I go to look up hotties from old tv shows and movies usually today the men from said shows look much much better while the women look ... frankly horrible. What prompted this was my recent watch of Twin Peaks -- my lord did those hotties not age well while the men on average look noticeably more well put together all these years later, but of course that's just a small snippet/a single example which needs to be combined with others to form this conclusion and all that.
I just honestly don't get how so many people are in denial about this -- women, I guess I can understand since the truth hurts on this front, but men? Surely men have eyes and the ability to observe patterns no?
And of course you're called a """"""misogynist"""""" for acknowledging this based on your own two eyes. You know because women's looks holding up horribly in reality is because of the patriarchy or some bullshit. I dunno man, I really just wish more people were willing and able to accept things as they are instead of just believing whatever suits them.
What I wonder is, when women are young do they think they're invincible? They're hot shit and they know they're hot shit/highly desirable so they take advantage of it and live large without thinking realistically on the future. Seems to me a woman's best bet for the long term is when they're within that 18-25 range, find the highest value most Chad guy you can land (or just pick a decent looking fellow in med school or comp sci/engineering or some such) then get him to marry you. Boom, your life is now on easy mode and you'll be provided for assuming you have sex with him and don't get fat.
Men on the other hand? Most men cannot get sex easily -- a lot of men try to compete with each other and to build wealth/get a good job/reasonable status so that they can get a woman to commit to them, ideally a woman in this optimal age range who still looks fertile since that's what men find attractive. It's just interesting to think on the differences and I have to say, the male route is obviously much much harder despite what everyone is told. If you're even an average looking woman and you're willing to settle on the looks front, you can usually find some Uni student who's not the best looking guy in a good field who wants to have kids and wammo, you get to stay at home watching netflix all day with your kid or two while the dude goes out a wage slaves for you. Unhappy later? The woman can just divorce rape you and loses nothing.
The thing that grinds my gears is, nothing I'm saying here is untrue, but speaking the truth when its critical of women or reflects them in a privileged light is a big no-no in western countries because we have a lot of fucking retards.
Last edited:
