Venting Who was more based Genghis khan or Atilla

[Retardfuel]

Both killed tens of millions of people, but Mongols were focussed on chunks, Slavs and Iranians, Hunns were focused on Romans and goths

 

[SoloAlex]

Both killed tens of millions of people

why is this based?

 

[Racial-Identitarian]

Both killed tens of millions of people, but Mongols were focussed on chunks, Slavs and Iranians, Hunns were focused on Romans and goths

Hunns because i hate western european

 

[verzetn]

Both killed tens of millions of people, but Mongols were focussed on chunks, Slavs and Iranians, Hunns were focused on Romans and goths

disagreed.

mongols wanted to conquer the entire world. and im sure the Huns too, if they felt the had the chance.

Genghis Khan literally means "khan of the heaven sky" or "khan of the universe" something like that depending on translation, they were to go to the "great sea on the west" aka the Atlantic ocean if they had the chance.

they got thwarted by the Hungarians though. their victory over the Hungarians were extremely costly and they almost lost the Battle of Mohi, by luck. And when they invaded the 2nd time they got totally defeated. And the 3rd time failed too.

NEITHER WERE BASED.

mongols and huns were literal monsters who slaughtered people en-masse just for fun. now one might argue its like ER on a national/ethnical scale but imo ERs are often based on feelings of injustice, while those gook nomads "conquests" were based on lust for wealth etc. therefore extremely normie-like, materialistic, and of very far different mentality from the likes of ERs.

 

[Retardfuel]

disagreed.

mongols wanted to conquer the entire world. and im sure the Huns too, if they felt the had the chance.

Genghis Khan literally means "khan of the heaven sky" or "khan of the universe" something like that depending on translation, they were to go to the "great sea on the west" aka the Atlantic ocean if they had the chance.

they got thwarted by the Hungarians though. their victory over the Hungarians were extremely costly and they almost lost the Battle of Mohi, by luck. And when they invaded the 2nd time they got totally defeated. And the 3rd time failed too.

NEITHER WERE BASED.

mongols and huns were literal monsters who slaughtered people en-masse just for fun. now one might argue its like ER on a national/ethnical scale but imo ERs are often based on feelings of injustice, while those gook nomads "conquests" were based on lust for wealth etc. therefore extremely normie-like, materialistic, and of very far different mentality from the likes of ERs.

Slaughtering people for fun is very based

 

[SoloAlex]

Slaughtering people for fun is very based

go out and do it then


also:

JoinedJun 25, 2022
Posts231
Online3d 1h 4m

 

[Sennacherib]

The mongol russians and other deformed truecels in ww2 when they invaded chad germany and raped blue eyed blonde Stacys