Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Who are White Women in America having kids with?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 23656
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 23656

Self-banned
-
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Posts
4,137
Using same source data as before:


Period is 2016-2018

This time I have used the data for Non-Hispanic White Women so no Latinas or Mexicans are involved. Here are the results:

Father's RaceNumber of Births with Non Hispanic White Females in 2016-2018Number of Births Total by Father's race in 2016-2018Proportion of Births with Non Hispanic White Females
White
1,647,323​
2,308,875​
71%​
Black
58,111​
472,931​
12%​
More than one race
33,325​
78,273​
43%​
American Indian or Alaskan Native
7,405​
24,479​
30%​
Asian Indian
4,396​
74,672​
6%​
Filipino
3,257​
20,471​
16%​
Other Asian
3,057​
39,438​
8%​
Chinese
2,554​
46,780​
5%​
Median
2,554
20,471
16%
Korean
1,830​
11,133​
16%​
Vietnamese
1,158​
15,599​
7%​
Japanese
734​
3,950​
19%​
Other Pacific Islander
639​
5,394​
12%​
Hawaiian
367​
883​
42%​
Samoan
360​
2,236​
16%​
Guamanian
264​
1,145​
23%​

Key takeaways

This is not a statistic on Tinder or whatever. This is a study of who has kids with who. Therefore attractiveness cannot be the only factor. Obviously stuff like Family resources (aka betabuxxing ability), culture of having children etc also play a role here.

Whites are obviously the highest. But its interesting to see that 29% of kids are from white fathers who had kids had it with mothers who aren't non-hispanic whites.

Blacks have the second highest which is expected given their massive population size over other ethnic groups. But that said only 12% of kids produced by Black Fathers are with White women. Single moms aren't taken into account here though.

Proportion wise, Hawaiians have the largest of number of kids with white females (After whites and mixed races). But what exactly defines Hawaiian anyway?

Curries/Asian Indians have a pretty high amount (Relatively speaking) given all the shit we throw at them. However things to consider is Curries in General have a lot of kids since many are FOB immigrants and the culture is still to be family focused. Also the average Indian American earns USD 131K each year which is a whooping 40K higher than the next highest earner, Taiwanese Americans who only earn on average USD 91K per year. Many of them are from good backgrounds who came to the US to do a masters or something then worked in Silicon Valley, Medicine etc. So probably having the best betabuxxing ability (after Jews) really helps attract the white females. However despite all that stuff, only 6% of kids by Curry Fathers are with White Females. From my previous post, 90% will be with other Curry females. So if you're if you're a curry but really hate currywhores, sorry but if you do have get married and have kids, probability wise, you're still gonna end up with one if you're in America.

Fillpinos do pretty well too. Much higher proportion than Indians at 16%. However what should be considered is that unlike Curries, Fillipino foids are not loyal to their own. 60% of children from Fillipino mothers are from non Filipino fathers. Japanese do very well too at 19%. But like Fillipinos their foids also are not loyal to their own.

Rice/Chinese are kinda like Indians but not as successful. They just don't have as many kids in general (culture not as strong) plus their Betabuxx ability isn't as strong. Like Indians, majority of Chinese Americans just marry and have kids with each other. I guess FOB factor is similar here.

Native Amercians fathers have a lot of kids from white mothers. But the same can be said of Native American Mothers who have kids with non-native american fathers.
 
Last edited:
When the media blasts BMWF propaganda 24/7 it's only to be expected that traitor foids turn to negro males.
 
When the media blasts BMWF propaganda 24/7 it's only to be expected that traitor foids turn to negro males.
Absolute amount maybe so.

But according to this data, out of 1,764,780 births by white females, 93% are still from white fathers.

However the data where the father isn't known isn't included. So single moms aren't accounted for.
 
However the data where the father isn't known isn't included. So single moms aren't accounted for

In that case I'm surprised the bmwf statistic isn't closer to zero. Where are these mythical black men that raise their kids? I know of none.
 
white foids should be rounded up and put into camps
 
Curries/Asian Indians have a pretty high amount (Relatively speaking) given all the shit we throw at them.

Also the average Indian American earns USD 131K each year which is a whooping 40K higher than the next highest earner,

Tldr: Just be Curry?
 
Tldr: Just be Curry?
If you only focus on the Curry Male/White Female pairing figure than yes.

Otherwise for most part, Curries are gonna remain with other Curries. Curry Male/White Female accounts for only 6% of kids by male curries.

90% of male curries will be loyal to their own. 88% of female curries will be loyal to their own.

Not sure why both are so loyal but in a way I'm actually impressed by their loyalty.
 
>This time I have used the data for Non-Hispanic White Women so no Latinas or Mexicans are involved. Here are the results:
No latino men at all?
Aren't Latinos the biggest ethnic minority in the USA?
 
Didn't expect curries to do better than rice given how rice are more intelligent and better looking than most curries. I guess its their neoteny that brings them down in the eyes of whites.
Did you even read the chart? Curries are not doing better than rice.
 
Didn't expect curries to do better than rice given how rice are more intelligent and better looking than most curries. I guess its their neoteny that brings them down in the eyes of whites.
Even if they are better looking, how much better looking are they where it becomes a significant advantage over Indian Americans who are significantly richer?

Here are some facts to consider about Indian Americans

  • Apparently a lot of them are Brahmins. They might even make the majority. Or rather to say at least, Indians of Lower Caste aren't expected to be a significant amount.
  • If so they are the elite of the elite. So they probably have better genes. In contrast, most Rice Americans are probably runaway peasants from South China until recently
  • Indian Americans have a much better rep in America. They are CEOs of Google and Microsoft
  • Lets not forget some Northern Indians look pretty white and lack many ethnic features. Combine that with Brahmin class, and you almost have a white man. Meanwhile even the biggest Chang cannot look "white" unless he is mixed.

But like I said, doing better than Rice alone doesn't really mean much except feeling slightly better. After all most of those Indian American Brahmins will still settling down with a female Curry.
 
Indians > Filipino > Other Asian > Chinese > Korean > Vietnamese > Japanese
Indians do better than each of the individual asian races. Sure, collectively, Asians do better, but not individually.
Um Indians are at 6% while Koreans are at 16% and Japanese are at 19%.
 
(Incels: 13, Bluepillers: 49)
 
Just be curry, bro!
 
Absolute amount maybe so.

But according to this data, out of 1,764,780 births by white females, 93% are still from white fathers.

However the data where the father isn't known isn't included. So single moms aren't accounted for.
So white women are the most loyal?
 

Similar threads

highschoolcel
Replies
6
Views
168
Grotesque Deformity
Grotesque Deformity
Zhou Chang-Xing
Replies
7
Views
274
Serpents reign
Serpents reign
B
Replies
0
Views
92
bcroger
B
B
Replies
9
Views
314
stalin22
stalin22

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top