![Shaktiman](/data/avatars/m/43/43149.jpg?1717102312)
Shaktiman
Major
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 24, 2022
- Posts
- 2,400
White Man Sues IBM for Allegedly Firing Him for Being a White Man - Daily Stormer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=au8OIXXHnyk This is possibly an important case. If the white man win
White Man Sues IBM for Allegedly Firing Him for Being a White Man
Snake Baker August 24, 2024This is possibly an important case.
If the white man wins, it could mean that while the Civil Rights Act says you are forced to hire infinity brown people (and women and trannies), you are not actually allowed to fire white men in order to replace them with diversity.
The Civil Rights Act is a disaster, and totally nullifies basic Constitutional rights, but if it is taken literally, it probably means you’re not allowed to fire white men based on the fact they are white men.
Reuters:
IBM is accused in a new lawsuit of forcing out a high-performing white consultant in order to further the company’s goals of building a more diverse workforce.
The lawsuit filed late Tuesday, opens new tab in Grand Rapids, Michigan, federal court is the latest from America First Legal, a conservative group founded by ex-Trump administration officials, to claim that corporate diversity policies violate federal anti-discrimination laws.
Plaintiff Randall Dill says he was placed on a performance improvement plan in July 2023 despite receiving only positive feedback in his seven years as a senior managing consultant at IBM. The plan was impossible to complete and Dill was fired last October, according to the complaint.
/1BREAKING
We just sued IBM for allegedly firing a high-performing white, male employee to fulfill illegal race & sex-based employment quotas.
This is the third legal action against IBM for race discrimination — the second from AFL, plus one from @AGAndrewBailey.
THREAD: pic.twitter.com/RMv3ulgFVK
— America First Legal (@America1stLegal) August 21, 2024
The fact that they claim they weren’t doing quotas means they don’t know what the law is yet either.Dill says IBM had race and sex quota systems that guided hiring and promotion decisions and that it based executives’ bonuses in part on whether they had met those goals, giving them a strong incentive to push out white men like him.
“Plaintiff suffered significant damages, including lost wages, loss of professional and career development opportunities, and significant non-economic injuries, including humiliation, embarrassment, and loss of reputation,” Dill’s lawyers wrote in the complaint.
IBM in a statement said it does not use hiring quotas and never has.
“These allegations are baseless, as neither race nor gender played any role in the decision to end this individual’s employment with IBM,” the company said.
No one does. No one has been able to figure out whether or not the Civil Rights Act allows for white men to be fired because they are white men.
The US Constitution ended with Lincoln. This is the fact. People sound like kooks when they say that, because we obviously had some good years after the 1950s, but the fact of reality is that “civil rights” are not compatible with the Constitution, and any good years we had as a country after the Constitution was abolished by Lincoln were just a matter of luck.The lawsuit accuses IBM of race and sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars workplace discrimination, and Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which prohibits race discrimination in contracts.
America First Legal has made similar claims against a slew of major companies, including in about two dozen complaints seeking investigations by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Yep…