While .co was down

[Beta_Le_Pew]

Obviously I thought this was the end of .co, but it came back. In the meantime, I searched "incel forum down" and found the attached article written by some foid. Her name is interesting. What say you @Emba ?

The article is fairly recent and they quoted someone from .co, but it was before my time here. Anyone recognize it? Washington Post made you famous.

"We have lived our entire lives believing the ‘bluepilled’ lies that society tells us,” wrote one man on Incels.co. “Work hard and you’ll be rewarded. Just be yourself and you’ll find a nice girl. But life has been hard on us, people have been hard on us, and none of this s--- made any sense until everything suddenly clicked: we live a misreable [sic] life because we are ugly.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/men-are-in-trouble-incels-are-proof/2019/06/07/8d6ad596-8936-11e9-a870-b9c411dc4312_story.html

 

[blond_elf_bard]

is Washington post even written by people living in DC?

 

[TheSecondComing]

you thought this was the end? This happens so often though

 

[needsolution]

You could send him it over pm not making extrenal thread on public cunt

 

[78980n]

you thought this was the end? This happens so often though

 

[FrothySolutions]

Obviously I thought this was the end of .co, but it came back. In the meantime, I searched "incel forum down" and found the attached article written by some foid. Her name is interesting. What say you @Emba ?

The article is fairly recent and they quoted someone from .co, but it was before my time here. Anyone recognize it? Washington Post made you famous.

"We have lived our entire lives believing the ‘bluepilled’ lies that society tells us,” wrote one man on Incels.co. “Work hard and you’ll be rewarded. Just be yourself and you’ll find a nice girl. But life has been hard on us, people have been hard on us, and none of this s--- made any sense until everything suddenly clicked: we live a misreable [sic] life because we are ugly.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/men-are-in-trouble-incels-are-proof/2019/06/07/8d6ad596-8936-11e9-a870-b9c411dc4312_story.html

We've already talked about it. Long story short, it's nice to have some sympathy, but the sympathy is yikes and problematic because it still marginalizes us. Diminishes our problems. "These incels clearly are in some pain and we should care, however their problems are imaginary and it's not women's fault anyway it's men's fault we didn't do anything."

 

[Barrix]

is Washington post even written by people living in DC?

I thought it was named after Washington state.

 

[Deleted member 21504]

Washington Post

 

[Ellsworth]

Lol @ Emba’s black Stacy wife.

 

[LastGerman]

"These incels clearly are in some pain and we should care, however their problems are imaginary and it's not women's fault anyway it's men's fault we didn't do anything."

Even it this all because of men, we are not even allowed to fix it. They just contradict themselves once again.

 

[Beta_Le_Pew]

is Washington post even written by people living in DC?

Fuck if I know. Pretty sure it is run by the leftists.

you thought this was the end? This happens so often though

silly me. Fuck it.

 

[FrothySolutions]

Even it this all because of men, we are not even allowed to fix it. They just contradict themselves once again.

We're allowed to fix it, in the way that people like Terry Crews and Winston Duke are trying to fix it. "Redefining masculinity" and taking responsibility for all the ills of society that we've apparently inherited.

 

[HowCanSheSlap]

We've already talked about it. Long story short, it's nice to have some sympathy, but the sympathy is yikes and problematic because it still marginalizes us. Diminishes our problems. "These incels clearly are in some pain and we should care, however their problems are imaginary and it's not women's fault anyway it's men's fault we didn't do anything."

It's not saying our problems are imaginary nor it's not women's fault. Did you even read the article? It doesn't say much actually....

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

i knew that the site was down only for a brief moment

 

[RemoveNormalfags]

It won't go down that easily, we already had longer periods

 

[Beta_Le_Pew]

It won't go down that easily, we already had longer periods

Good to know. We will not be silenced.

 

[FrothySolutions]

It's not saying our problems are imaginary nor it's not women's fault. Did you even read the article? It doesn't say much actually....

Not only did I read the article, but I've spoken with the writer. I mentioned how toxic femininity exists and we want women held accountable, and her words to me were "But does it though? In the aggregate?"

 

[TheGoodGuy]

While the site was down

 

[Emba]

Lol @ Emba’s black Stacy wife.

I thought she was a white jew?
God fucking damn! How many emba-named cunt reporters are there?


So much for being "original"

Call me EMBA-RRASSED!

 

[LastGerman]

We're allowed to fix it, in the way that people like Terry Crews and Winston Duke are trying to fix it. "Redefining masculinity" and taking responsibility for all the ills of society that we've apparently inherited.

Are we really? Females like to say ''just man up'', but how exactly is this even possible if we are limited in our actions in the first place? Is ''redefining masculinity'' the way? Does it really need to be redefined? Why is it, that everything what is considered manly is brought up into question? Is not the problem that people even men who are aware of it, tend to blame men once again?

 

[Ropemaxx]

If this site gets taken down, its only a matter of time before they get the chambers for incels.
Start with removing our rights to speak. Then they can move to more violent ways to deal with us. We are already demonized to death by the mainstream. They have somehow conviced them that ALL incels are homocidal maniacs while magically there is a #notallmuslims agenda

 

[FrothySolutions]

Are we really? Females like to say ''just man up'', but how exactly is this even possible if we are limited in our actions in the first place? Is ''redefining masculinity'' the way? Does it really need to be redefined? Why is it, that everything what is considered manly is brought up into question? Is not the problem that people even men who are aware of it, tend to blame men once again?

They don't mean "man up." They mean be like that Gillette commercial.

 

[HowCanSheSlap]

Not only did I read the article, but I've spoken with the writer. I mentioned how toxic femininity exists and we want women held accountable, and her words to me were "But does it though? In the aggregate?"

I was talking about that article. She seemed to blame technology as the primary cause of inceldom. In that tweet, you seem to be having a different conversation with someone else who responded to that article and she chipped in....

 

[FrothySolutions]

I was talking about that article. She seemed to blame technology as the primary cause of inceldom. In that tweet, you seem to be having a different conversation with someone else who responded to that article and she chipped in....

No, I was talking to her, about that exact article. And she doesn't name technology as the cause for our inceldom, just that it's made socializing harder because everyone would rather be online. Also, Internet porn has warped our standards for what "real women" and "real relationships" are like. According to that article.

 

[HowCanSheSlap]

No, I was talking to her, about that exact article. And she doesn't name technology as the cause for our inceldom, just that it's made socializing harder because everyone would rather be online. Also, Internet porn has warped our standards for what "real women" and "real relationships" are like. According to that article.

You were talking about something else because you LITERALLY replied to a guy who was complaining about the conclusion of the article (what the solution isn't - telling men to 'go out') - you went off on your own tangent in response to this and said I want more recognition/equal footing as a man. You didn't talk to anyone about that article. She asked a follow up question for which I saw no response....

ANYWAY, she doesn't name 'technology' in the article but everything that that she mentioned encompasses 'technology' brainlet. It's easy to see what she's implying, you must be low IQ not to recognize it.

 

[FrothySolutions]

You were talking about something else because you LITERALLY replied to a guy who was complaining about the conclusion of the article (what the solution isn't - telling men to 'go out') - you went off on your own tangent in response to this and said I want more recognition/equal footing as a man. You didn't talk to anyone about that article. She asked a follow up question for which I saw no response....

ANYWAY, she doesn't name 'technology' in the article but everything that that she mentioned encompasses 'technology' brainlet. It's easy to see what she's implying, you must be low IQ not to recognize it.

We weren't talking about anything unrelated. The three of us were talking about the issues she raised in that article. Scroll up, you'll see. He was talking about the article doesn't offer any solutions for the problem, and I said the solution is addressing toxic femininity in society. And she says "Show me where toxic femininity exists in the aggregate."

 

[HowCanSheSlap]

We weren't talking about anything unrelated. The three of us were talking about the issues she raised in that article. Scroll up, you'll see. He was talking about the article doesn't offer any solutions for the problem, and I said the solution is addressing toxic femininity in society. And she says "Show me where toxic femininity exists in the aggregate."

Again that had nothing to do the article. The initial reply was it would've been better to come up with 'suggestions' - which were absent from the article. You can't criticize an article for something which it doesn't mention nor was the point of the article. You said earlier on that it says mens problem are imaginary or not womens fault - please refer me to where in the article it says that.

Are we going to keep going in circle or are you going to admit the freaking obvious that, that article was pointless garbage?

 

[FrothySolutions]

Again that had nothing to do the article. The initial reply was it would've been better to come up with 'suggestions' - which were absent from the article. You can't criticize an article for something which it doesn't mention nor was the point of the article. You said earlier on that it says mens problem are imaginary or not womens fault - please refer me to where in the article it says that.

Are we going to keep going in circle or are you going to admit the freaking obvious that, that article was pointless garbage?

Suggestions to the problems that the article raises. That's what we were discussing. The article intends to "confront the disease." The article tries to name the disease that we should confront. Hence the line "To treat modern life’s ugliest symptoms, we’ll first have to confront the disease." The closest she comes to blaming technology for that is how she goes into how technology has replaced human connection. What she says IS imaginary are all of the bad things women do that the article talks about. "Their conclusions are wrong" she says. She even says to me that toxic femininity doesn't exist in the aggregate. At least as far as she can see.

 

[FinnCel]

This site is so slow now...
This site is so slow now...

 

[HowCanSheSlap]

Suggestions to the problems that the article raises. That's what we were discussing. The article intends to "confront the disease." The article tries to name the disease that we should confront. Hence the line "To treat modern life’s ugliest symptoms, we’ll first have to confront the disease." The closest she comes to blaming technology for that is how she goes into how technology has replaced human connection. What she says IS imaginary are all of the bad things women do that the article talks about. "Their conclusions are wrong" she says. She even says to me that toxic femininity doesn't exist in the aggregate. At least as far as she can see.

According to the Oxford Dictionary a 'suggestions is: "an idea or plan put forward for consideration". Applied to this context that means it's something the author can write about in the future in another article that follows from this. That means everything you talk about hereafter has nothing specifically to do with that article. Get it now?

You quote that article trying to to prove a point that doesn't exist? She never anything is 'imaginary' - you've just mis-contextualised those quotes and embedded your own assumption to those quotation - when she says "their conclusions are wrong" - she is talking about ER and how he thinks 'the world that hasn’t given them the women they think they deserve" - NOTHING about 'toxic feminism' which is a discussion you bring up on Twitter after this 'suggestion'.

 

[FrothySolutions]

According to the Oxford Dictionary a 'suggestions is: "an idea or plan put forward for consideration". Applied to this context that means it's something the author can write about in the future in another article that follows from this. That means everything you talk about hereafter has nothing specifically to do with that article. Get it now?

You quote that article trying to to prove a point that doesn't exist? She never anything is 'imaginary' - you've just mis-contextualised those quotes and embedded your own assumption to those quotation - when she says "their conclusions are wrong" - she is talking about ER and how he thinks 'the world that hasn’t given them the women they think they deserve" - NOTHING about 'toxic feminism' which is a discussion you bring up on Twitter after this 'suggestion'.

Suggestions for the problem the article mentions. The article is about the disease. It doesn't mention solutions, yes. But it mentions a disease. We're talking about solutions, which means we're talking about what the disease is. I say that the disease is toxic femininity. She says "I don't see any toxic femininity. Not in the aggregate." The article is about the disease, and here I have the author herself saying that it is not the disease, because she isn't even aware that it exists. It's imaginary. Like all the other points in that same article that she says are wrong. She even calls it "self-perpetuating," the outlook we have.

 

[HowCanSheSlap]

Suggestions for the problem the article mentions. The article is about the disease. It doesn't mention solutions, yes. But it mentions a disease. We're talking about solutions, which means we're talking about what the disease is. I say that the disease is toxic femininity. She says "I don't see any toxic femininity. Not in the aggregate." The article is about the disease, and here I have the author herself saying that it is not the disease, because she isn't even aware that it exists. It's imaginary. Like all the other points in that same article that she says are wrong. She even calls it "self-perpetuating," the outlook we have.

Again - to her the disease is the influence of modern communications and technology in that article. What your arguing about is based on a Twitter conversation.

This is an off the cuff conversation about the disease - which in your mind means 'toxic femininity'.

She seems to acknowledge it exists (she says 'there is such a thing as misandry') - but says it affects women too. But in regards to men she seems to be neither denying it (i.e. thinking its imaginary) nor affirming it.

 

[Beta_Le_Pew]

I thought she was a white jew?
God fucking damn! How many emba-named cunt reporters are there?


So much for being "original"

Call me EMBA-RRASSED!

Do you know more Emba reporters? You are the only Emba as far as I am concerned.

 

[Lester]

Call me EMBA-RRASSED!

Batman IQ

 

[FrothySolutions]

Again - to her the disease is the influence of modern communications and technology in that article. What your arguing about is based on a Twitter conversation.

This is an off the cuff conversation about the disease - which in your mind means 'toxic femininity'.

She seems to acknowledge it exists (she says 'there is such a thing as misandry') - but says it affects women too. But in regards to men she seems to be neither denying it (i.e. thinking its imaginary) nor affirming it.

What she says of modern technology is that it's replaced human connection. That's not what we here cite as the problem. What we cite as the problem is toxic femininity. And she says it technically exists, just not in the aggregate. That's when she said "misandry exists" I was like "So why don't we take it seriously? Why don't we talk about it like we talk about toxic masculinity? That's the disease." And so she said "We don't talk about it because it's not in the aggregate, unless you wanna show me."

That's what she's calling imaginary. In that article and in that post. She dismisses the gripes of Rodger and Minassian and me, claiming that misandry is such an imaginary non-issue and that's why we don't talk about it. It can't be misandry that's the problem. According to her and that article.

 

[Emba]

Do you know more Emba reporters? You are the only Emba as far as I am concerned.

Idk. There was a white bitch someone linked a pro Incel story a while back.

 

[zangano1]

I was afraid boyos

 

[Descartes]

When was the forum down, I didn't notice

 

[Beta_Le_Pew]

When was the forum down, I didn't notice

About 3 hours ago a couple of times.

 

[Descartes]

About 3 hours ago a couple of times.

I was re watching the joker, I guess I was lucky not to realise it was down, I hope it doesn't go down again anytime soon

 

[Beta_Le_Pew]

I was re watching the joker, I guess I was lucky not to realise it was down, I hope it doesn't go down again anytime soon

I'm sure it will. It's over.

 

[ManletHalfCurry]

This happens so often though

 

[what is happening]

The article is fairly recent and they quoted someone from .co, but it was before my time here. Anyone recognize it? Washington Post made you famous.

"We have lived our entire lives believing the ‘bluepilled’ lies that society tells us,” wrote one man on Incels.co. “Work hard and you’ll be rewarded. Just be yourself and you’ll find a nice girl. But life has been hard on us, people have been hard on us, and none of this s--- made any sense until everything suddenly clicked: we live a misreable [sic] life because we are ugly.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/men-are-in-trouble-incels-are-proof/2019/06/07/8d6ad596-8936-11e9-a870-b9c411dc4312_story.html

This is the thread.

https://incels.is/threads/to-the-fbi-canadian-police-infiltrators-reading-this-forum.104395/

 

[Beta_Le_Pew]

This is the thread.

https://incels.is/threads/to-the-fbi-canadian-police-infiltrators-reading-this-forum.104395/

Wow. Thanks. That thread was created a whole 6 months prior to that shitty article.

 

[MarriedAndLookin4Fun]

is Washington post even written by people living in DC?

its written by people in israel tbh...

 

[Deleted member 10124]

We've already talked about it. Long story short, it's nice to have some sympathy, but the sympathy is yikes and problematic because it still marginalizes us. Diminishes our problems. "These incels clearly are in some pain and we should care, however their problems are imaginary and it's not women's fault anyway it's men's fault we didn't do anything."

What she says of modern technology is that it's replaced human connection. That's not what we here cite as the problem. What we cite as the problem is toxic femininity. And she says it technically exists, just not in the aggregate. That's when she said "misandry exists" I was like "So why don't we take it seriously? Why don't we talk about it like we talk about toxic masculinity? That's the disease." And so she said "We don't talk about it because it's not in the aggregate, unless you wanna show me."

That's what she's calling imaginary. In that article and in that post. She dismisses the gripes of Rodger and Minassian and me, claiming that misandry is such an imaginary non-issue and that's why we don't talk about it. It can't be misandry that's the problem. According to her and that article.