1. Your point is literally like saying if you owned a business and partnered with another owner, him consulted you about ending the contract and leaving is worse than him violating your contract and making deals behind your back
That doesn't make sense, in one scenario you have a civil resolution of an agreement, in the other someone is violating an agreement while utilizing the resources of the person being violated, the two aren't even comparable
2. What kind kind retard logic is this, breaking up is worse because you don't have a man to try and fucking beat up afterwards?, what kind of cuck shit is this, this sounds like a normie males way of thinking, always blaming the man, only men are accountable, beat the bitch up, she's the one who cheated
Also you could just stalk her and beat up her new BF all the same as you'd try and fight the guy who she cheated on you with, so a guy always exists for you to fight in either scenario