Recently I watched some video about the man or bear debate and the video creator put up a recording of a series of street interviews where people where asked that same question. One foid went on a tirade about how bear attacks aren't unreported, about how the victim of a bear attack doesn't risk jail etc. (essentially saying that it is dangerous or hard to get a man convicted of rape/sexual assault). When in reality, the opposite is true. A foid can say that a man raped her 30 years ago without any proof and the man (unless he is literally multi millionaire) is done for. You would literally have a better chance of defending yourself against "enemy of the workers" accusation in Stalin's Soviet Union than against a rape accusation in today's west.
