Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill When you say Chad, what do you mean? (percentage wise)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 34161
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 34161

General of the incel wars
-
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Posts
1,212
When I talk about Chad, I talk about roughly the top 3% of males. Chad-lite is top 5-10% and high tier normie top 20-30%.
 
I talk about top 1% aka 8/10
 
there's no general consensus, and it has been too homoeroticized as a term to be loosely used.
 
with chad i mean Charlie Hunnam
 
Everyone in my vicinity may as well be chad when compared to me
 
When I talk about Chad, I talk about roughly the top 3% of males. Chad-lite is top 5-10% and high tier normie top 20-30%.
I basically had no preconceptions about what it meant and deferred to the "decile scale" stuff I saw on the wiki.

Apprently 8/9/10 = chadlite / chad / gigachad

I think that's fucking stupid so I an renaming the 8/10 as "midchad" and instead we should consider "chad" to be collectively 8-10

The question is, of the 10 ranks, what % is each rank meant to be?

Like presumably 1/10 (lowest rank) is the first 10% of men and the highest (10/10) is the highest 10% of men?

But mathematically that feels a bit off TBH. This would mean that 30% of men are Chads, which seems too high.

So how else can we distribute % per decile? Perhaps a Gaussian funciton which produces a Bell Curve? The standard/normal distribution?

So something like
1/10 and 10/10 are 1% each = 2​
2/10 and 9/10 are 2% each = 4​
3/10 and 8/10 are 4% each = 8​
4/10 and 7/10 are 8% each = 16​
5/10 and 6/10 are 16% each = 32​

That only totals 62 so it would need to be fiddled with, I haven't mathed in a while so I don't know how to adapt this properly.

We know that the midpoints would be 5 and 6 so would that be the 20% of men in the middle?

Also it's never clear if we're talking about "in a given age group" or "all living males" because that would have a large effect.

Old men are much uglier than young men for example, so if we're including them they're going to pull down the average and make a guy who is 1/10 in terms of just high school boys seem like 5/10 in terms of outclassing geezers who used to be those 1/10 high school boys and spiralled further down.
 
Last edited:
Chad is top 10%(giga chad is top 2-3% in lms). The next tier is the next 10% which would chad lite. The next 30% is high tier Normies. Over for the bottom 50% as they are increasingly incel or beta bux(cuck).
 
:feelswhat:10% of the general male population is not a Chad. Try 1%.

Maybe 10% of Tinder though.
You guys are giving chad way to much credit. Dare I say deifying him. Hes not god. And the 1% would be giga chad.
 

Similar threads

AdExpress
Replies
6
Views
422
Fortress Resolution
Fortress Resolution
boneless goblin
Replies
35
Views
944
I want to believe
I want to believe
ThePornographer
Replies
10
Views
408
Emba
Emba

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top