Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

When did we as a society start putting women on the highest pedestal?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 2299
  • Start date
Deleted member 2299

Deleted member 2299

Self-banned
-
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Posts
668
And then you're surprised that they look down on you from it.
Any semi-attractive femoid can garner a million followers on Instagram, Twitch, Twitter, YouTube fast
How did men in America become so thirsty?
Considering the gender ratios are 1:1 we should all be getting laid, so the only logical explanation to this is that just as many women are choosing to be single and denying us sex or taking turns with Chad
 
Since before humans (homo sapiens) existed. It began with sexual selection, which arose when brains were developed.
 
KyloRen said:
Since before humans (homo sapiens) existed. It began with sexual selection, which arose when brains were developed.
 
KyloRen said:
Since before humans (homo sapiens) existed. It began with sexual selection, which arose when brains were developed.

^This^

Men are biologically hardwired to protect and provide for women and to see other men as competition. That's why (non high status) men have always been disposable. That's why "women and children first" policies predate modern feminism.
 
KyloRen said:
Since before humans (homo sapiens) existed. It began with sexual selection, which arose when brains were developed.

I know the 80/20 rule where 80% of women are only willing to date top 20% of guys but that's not mathematically possible since it means a huge deficit in male selection and 60% of women are left single, they'd have to take turns or become a cat lady if they're not willing to fuck with the rest of us. Is that really what's happening right now? Pretty horrendous
 
Ryo_Hazuki said:
Men are biologically hardwired to protect and provide for women and to see other men as competition.  That's why (non high status) men have always been disposable.  That's why "women and children first" policies predate modern feminism.

I agree, I'm going to tie in this idea with Rahmawn's comment.

Rahmawn said:
I know the 80/20 rule where 80% of women are only willing to date top 20% of guys but that's not mathematically possible since it means a huge deficit in male selection and 60% of women are left single, they'd have to take turns or become a cat lady if they're not willing to fuck with the rest of us. Is that really what's happening right now? Pretty horrendous

I personally don't believe that 20% of men take "80%" of women. Yes, it doesn't make much sense. But, let's follow the current and tie in what Ryo said.

Inceldom is mostly a modern problem. We might be seeing more of it today because of the Internet, of course, but I'd argue that the main reason is that there haven't been many wars.

Think about it, for all of human history, there have been terrible, deadly, wars. Who fight in wars? Men. Men die by the millions, and women are left alive. Men are disposable. What does this do? This forces women to date, and eventually mate with, less-attractive males because there just aren't a lot of men around.

We haven't had a major war in quite a while and this, in turn, makes men today have to compete even more for women than in previous generations.
 
KyloRen said:
I agree, I'm going to tie in this idea with Rahmawn's comment.


I personally don't believe that 20% of men take "80%" of women. Yes, it doesn't make much sense. But, let's follow the current and tie in what Ryo said.

Inceldom is mostly a modern problem. We might be seeing more of it today because of the Internet, of course, but I'd argue that the main reason is that there haven't been many wars.

Think about it, for all of human history, there have been terrible, deadly, wars. Who fight in wars? Men. Men die by the millions, and women are left alive. Men are disposable. What does this do? This forces women to date, and eventually mate with, less-attractive males because there just aren't a lot of men around.

We haven't had a major war in quite a while and this, in turn, makes men today have to compete even more for women than in previous generations.

I never thought of it that way. (The absence of war being a major factor.)
 
Since men were biologically programmed to want sex more and it led to men having much less sex than women as shown by the statistics in the black pigeon's video
 
KyloRen said:
I agree, I'm going to tie in this idea with Rahmawn's comment.


I personally don't believe that 20% of men take "80%" of women. Yes, it doesn't make much sense. But, let's follow the current and tie in what Ryo said.

Inceldom is mostly a modern problem. We might be seeing more of it today because of the Internet, of course, but I'd argue that the main reason is that there haven't been many wars.

Think about it, for all of human history, there have been terrible, deadly, wars. Who fight in wars? Men. Men die by the millions, and women are left alive. Men are disposable. What does this do? This forces women to date, and eventually mate with, less-attractive males because there just aren't a lot of men around.

We haven't had a major war in quite a while and this, in turn, makes men today have to compete even more for women than in previous generations.
The reason it's a modern problem is because social media didn't exist until the 21st century to encourage branch-swinging and promote degeneracy
I think social media is actually the biggest culprit cause think about it these girls wouldn't reject sub 8s like me if they didn't have Chad constantly commenting flirtatious things on their pics and texting them throughout the day to setup their next fuck date


towncel said:
Since men were biologically programmed to want sex more and it led to men having much less sex than women as shown by the statistics in the black pigeon's video

Yeah but why
 
Rahmawn said:
The reason it's a modern problem is because social media didn't exist until the 21st century to encourage branch-swinging and promote degeneracy
I think social media is actually the biggest culprit cause think about it these girls wouldn't reject sub 8s like me if they didn't have Chad constantly commenting flirtatious things on their pics and texting them throughout the day to setup their next fuck date



Yeah but why



Because that gives femoids control over sex and makes men fight each other for it but ironically women experience more pleasure during sex because their orgasms are 2 times longer, they have to put in 0 effort, aren't expected to last long and can have multiple orgasms in one sessions
 
towncel said:
Because that gives femoids control over sex and makes men fight each other for it but ironically women experience more pleasure during sex because their orgasms are 2 times longer, they have to put in 0 effort, aren't expected to last long and can have multiple orgasms in one sessions

I don't think that's the case. It's because females have to be picky since they'll be pregnant for 9 months, but males can plant their seed in as many females as possible because they don't have to get pregnant.
 
Rahmawn said:
The reason it's a modern problem is because social media didn't exist until the 21st century to encourage branch-swinging and promote degeneracy
I think social media is actually the biggest culprit cause think about it these girls wouldn't reject sub 8s like me if they didn't have Chad constantly commenting flirtatious things on their pics and texting them throughout the day to setup their next fuck date

Social media is also a factor in it.


Kointo said:
I don't think that's the case. It's because females have to be picky since they'll be pregnant for 9 months, but males can plant their seed in as many females as possible because they don't have to get pregnant.
H I G H
   Q
 
KyloRen said:
H I G H
   Q

Sarcasm?

It's just rational thinking and common knowledge.

I'm not high IQ. Maybe above average. My school was too easy. I would get 100s on finals without studying.
 
Rahmawn said:
And then you're surprised that they look down on you from it.
Any semi-attractive femoid can garner a million followers on Instagram, Twitch, Twitter, YouTube fast
How did men in America become so thirsty?
Considering the gender ratios are 1:1 we should all be getting laid, so the only logical explanation to this is that just as many women are choosing to be single and denying us sex or taking turns with Chad

There are more women than men in the world.  Ratio isn't 1:1, look into it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio

Feels bad in the US.
 
Bicboi said:
There are more women than men in the world.  Ratio isn't 1:1, look into it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio

Feels bad in the US.

I did look into it, it's close enough
 
I think it's mostly because females feel less guilty to have a new boyfriend every week and ride the cc. In 1900, she would've been rejected by society for doing this. It was very high risk. Like mentionned earlier, men also die much less than before. The few wars we have are not as deadly and working is not as dangerous. Third reason is new tools making everything easier for women. Tinder and facebook sealed the fate of low value males..
 
Ryo_Hazuki said:
^This^

Men are biologically hardwired to protect and provide for women and to see other men as competition.  That's why (non high status) men have always been disposable.  That's why "women and children first" policies predate modern feminism.

This is why I have uttermost respect for you
 
Rahmawn said:
And then you're surprised that they look down on you from it.
Any semi-attractive femoid can garner a million followers on Instagram, Twitch, Twitter, YouTube fast
How did men in America become so thirsty?
Considering the gender ratios are 1:1 we should all be getting laid, so the only logical explanation to this is that just as many women are choosing to be single and denying us sex or taking turns with Chad

The real ratio is 106:100. But when chasing young women you are also competing against older men and Chads who have harem, so the ratio is probably like 300:100.
 
Kointo said:
I don't think that's the case. It's because females have to be picky since they'll be pregnant for 9 months, but males can plant their seed in as many females as possible because they don't have to get pregnant.

I'm not sure about that, femoids aren't actually good at being picky and anyone would be picky if they had the option to be, just like they are when having protected sex
 
KyloRen said:
Social media is also a factor in it.


H I G H
   Q



It's common knowledge and what I said still stands
 
KyloRen said:
Since before humans (homo sapiens) existed. It began with sexual selection, which arose when brains were developed.

NO

our ancestors managed to control this shit
 
KyloRen said:
Since before humans (homo sapiens) existed. It began with sexual selection, which arose when brains were developed.
This.

Females are biologically considered valuable, while males were always seen as expendable. One man can impregnate multiple women, while one woman can only be impregnated once at a time. Women are also the ones who bear children, so men were always the ones who hunted for them and protected them.

Though, I feel like while men in the past valued women, they didn't give them power like they have now. Women were forced to fulfill their side of the bargain (cook, clean, take care of children, remain monogamous) while women nowadays are worshiped just for existing.
 
Minjaze said:
Though, I feel like while men in the past valued women, they didn't give them power like they have now. Women were forced to fulfill their side of the bargain (cook, clean, take care of children, remain monogamous) while women nowadays are worshiped just for existing
I like
 
nausea said:
NO

our ancestors managed to control this shit

No one can influence nature in such a way.
 
Kointo said:
nausea said:
NO
our ancestors managed to control this shit
No one can influence nature in such a way.
you will see what I mean if I find the fucking videoz
 
nausea said:
you will see what I mean if I find the fucking videoz

What videos?

2278134_orig.png
 
KyloRen said:
I agree, I'm going to tie in this idea with Rahmawn's comment.


I personally don't believe that 20% of men take "80%" of women. Yes, it doesn't make much sense. But, let's follow the current and tie in what Ryo said.

Inceldom is mostly a modern problem. We might be seeing more of it today because of the Internet, of course, but I'd argue that the main reason is that there haven't been many wars.

Think about it, for all of human history, there have been terrible, deadly, wars. Who fight in wars? Men. Men die by the millions, and women are left alive. Men are disposable. What does this do? This forces women to date, and eventually mate with, less-attractive males because there just aren't a lot of men around.

We haven't had a major war in quite a while and this, in turn, makes men today have to compete even more for women than in previous generations.

Holy shit you are right!! WW3 baby let's get it rolling
 
nausea said:
initiation rituals among tribes

Are my images not showing up for you?

original.gif
 
nausea said:
cuz I highlighted your sentences as @blickpall teached me to

I have no idea how to do that...

I don't have a need to anyway, but now I know that such a thing exists.
 
Kointo said:
nausea said:
cuz I highlighted your sentences as @blickpall teached me to
I have no idea how to do that...
I don't have a need to anyway, but now I know that such a thing exists.
you just higlight the words you want to and click on the fastquote
 
Kointo said:
Are my images not showing up for you?

original.gif

I don't remember near ever wearing a headset, from what episode is this?
 
towncel said:
I don't remember near ever wearing a headset, from what episode is this?

One of the final ones, I think. I don't know the exact episode.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top