R
.
Both are equally bad, but being a manlet is the absolute worst imo.
Last edited:
Being both a manlet and having an ugly face.
Face. Height is cope for people who aren't Chad-tier in terms of facial aesthetics.
I've been thinking about this. How ugly is "ugly?" Because most of the time around here when people say "ugly" what they mean is "normal." So if you mean "Normal face and normal height" vs. "Chiseled face but a boy's height," being normal height with normal face wins. Because he might not be a supermodel, but it's better than being a freak.
Face.
Face >>> everything else.
Face >>> everything else.
S
Face is everything
Yeah and it can vary too tbh
Manlet makes you less respected among men and hurts you with women.
Ugly face makes everyone biased against you in any instance and DESTROYS you with women.
Ugly face makes everyone biased against you in any instance and DESTROYS you with women.
Probably face.
voted for both
I know a 5'5 manlet with a decent gf probably because his face is a 8/10
Being a manlet is to know suffering.
C
Manlet is worse.
At least if you're ugly men won't belittle you. Half the population will still take you seriously. But manlets? Dude nobody likes manlets and not even other manlets. Napoleon conquered all of Europe, HE CAPTURED MOSCOW, and the first thing he's thought of in popular culture is as a manlet.
In WW1, the fate of entire nation's at stake in a cruel battle to the death, manlets were seen as so subhuman to be unfit of the dignity of the ultimate sacrifice. Nation's would rather lose than put a manlet on a monument in the center of town.
And it's always been this way. Throughout all time. It isn't a new phenomenon with Tinder or the sexual revolution...manlets have always been seen as less than human.
At least if you're ugly men won't belittle you. Half the population will still take you seriously. But manlets? Dude nobody likes manlets and not even other manlets. Napoleon conquered all of Europe, HE CAPTURED MOSCOW, and the first thing he's thought of in popular culture is as a manlet.
In WW1, the fate of entire nation's at stake in a cruel battle to the death, manlets were seen as so subhuman to be unfit of the dignity of the ultimate sacrifice. Nation's would rather lose than put a manlet on a monument in the center of town.
And it's always been this way. Throughout all time. It isn't a new phenomenon with Tinder or the sexual revolution...manlets have always been seen as less than human.
Face; more sculpt = more of a refined existence.
Height is not as sculpt-centric, and is more about mass.
People choose based on ornateness bec ause that is a defining trait of character.
Height is brutality, and people are clever/ intelligent. So good face = elven esque sophistication.
Being a big brawny brute is orcish, and less valuable. My dad being 5'7 would rather have good body mass than body sculpt.
Height is not as sculpt-centric, and is more about mass.
People choose based on ornateness bec ause that is a defining trait of character.
Height is brutality, and people are clever/ intelligent. So good face = elven esque sophistication.
Being a big brawny brute is orcish, and less valuable. My dad being 5'7 would rather have good body mass than body sculpt.
Ugly face for sure. My friend is pretty much a manlet but really good looking and he gets laid all the time.
Lol this question has been asked countless of times now. Both are really bad and a death sentence but ugly face is worse in my opinion but im biased. We all are.
Ugly face of course some larpers here will say otherwise.
Imagine being manlet having a ugly face and half curry half ricecel dicklet
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
