when is it safe to conclude you're GL? Or ugly?
G
If you get 1+ you are Chad
If you get 1 you are chadlite
If you get 0 you are normie
If you get arrested for sexual harassment you are incel.
If you get 1 you are chadlite
If you get 0 you are normie
If you get arrested for sexual harassment you are incel.
It's hard to tell, tinder is going full out with their bots trying to make desperate men give them more money, you would need to match have a good conversation and get a date, then you can count as 1
If you have gotten a match it was probably by mistake.
0%
By that I mean don’t use tinder. It’s a plague on society.
By that I mean don’t use tinder. It’s a plague on society.
jfl at this sig
If you're gotten one match that isn't a bot, gtfo.
I got exactly one match who looked like she weighed as much as the planet Jupiter.
Ipban= incel
https://archive.fo/N0f5D
An 80th percentile like percentage is ~5%
A 50th percentile like percentage is 0.87%
A 20th percentile like percentage is 0.14%
An 80th percentile like percentage is ~5%
A 50th percentile like percentage is 0.87%
A 20th percentile like percentage is 0.14%
as an average man? you should get a match after 1 year of swiping. (statistically).
as a male model, perhaps once every 3 weeks if you are active enough
as a male model, perhaps once every 3 weeks if you are active enough
T
One match every 100 swipes
If you get at least 5 matches in 1 day in your local area, than that means you're not an incel.
This tbh
I'm bad at math. How many likes is that?
Anselm the Incelfish got 8 likes in one night, and he continues to get likes to this day.
https://incels.is/threads/anselm-th...pping-8-matches-on-tinder-in-one-night.95090/
I
5/100 matches
So 5 Likes for every 100 of your own Likes?
I
if you swipe on 100 you will match with 5
wow all of you guys are retarded,where did you learn math?. percentages don't translate to this.
you can flip a coin 100 times and never get tree, if the tree chance is 0.5%. because of deviation's
so 5/100 is a good rate?
S
Pretty sure Tinder uses bots to encourage men. I used it when it first came out as I still had some hope, I got zero matches. Some time after that I was getting about 2 matches a day from 10/10 Stacy profiles, they never replied to anything and had really basic profiles (as in literally just location and job), I then created a fake Chad profile, he got loads of matches and also matches from the same profiles that my real account had, they still didn't reply to anything.
Pretty sure one of the main hookup / dating sites got some really bad press a few years back because they were doing the same thing, creating fake female profiles to entice men because the male success rate on those apps and sites is painfully low.
Then you also need to consider that holes tend to rate the overwhelming majority of men as below average attractiveness and only the top 1% as above average.
I'd say these days however you'll probably just get matched with fake profiles of some instagram slut trying to advertise herself. Its why when a Normie shows you his Tinder there will be 100+ matches of nothing but 10/10 sluts, but if you actually look at the profiles, they'll all be "Like what you see? follow me at...".
Pretty sure one of the main hookup / dating sites got some really bad press a few years back because they were doing the same thing, creating fake female profiles to entice men because the male success rate on those apps and sites is painfully low.
Then you also need to consider that holes tend to rate the overwhelming majority of men as below average attractiveness and only the top 1% as above average.
I'd say these days however you'll probably just get matched with fake profiles of some instagram slut trying to advertise herself. Its why when a Normie shows you his Tinder there will be 100+ matches of nothing but 10/10 sluts, but if you actually look at the profiles, they'll all be "Like what you see? follow me at...".
I
it's what the top 20 percent get according to the study
there is more to the rabbit hole.
some of these accounts aren't fake, but abandoned. these accounts are taken over by tinder bots so it gives them fake activity.
for example, they give you a 'like' and in order to see that you have to pay for premium account and boosts etc.
its much easier to take over empty accounts then to create new ones from scratch.
some bots can even give automated messages that entice you to pay for things.
S
Yeah it doesn't surprise me that this is happening at all. I know that these companies have been very worried the last few years since more and more men are abandoning them in droves because they finally realise that the monthly subscription is a waste of money. No wonder this companies are using bots to keep people interested. There was also another study done that basically broke up the female userbase of Tinder (The genuine profiles) something stupid like 70% of the whores asked said they had zero intention to meet with anyone they matched with, the other 30% was a mixture of them doing it for fun and those looking for a 10/10 perfect man.
R
This is the closest from what I've seen. Somewhere between 0.6 to 1.4 likes per 100 swipes would be "normal" for a man.
From what I understand you also need usually 10-20 matches before you might find one who will date/fuck you.
I
reminder this is how picky a 4-5/10 is on tinder
Similar threads
FishmanBecker
Users who are viewing this thread
