Nothingness
The Knight Of The Swords
-
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
- Posts
- 7,671
The question.
The only thing that matters, attractivenesson what?
3 for all of course, because his jaw looked pretty trustworthyWell? How did you rate him?
1 with "yes"
I did two and these were my results:
Left was a frauded pic, right was a normal pic. Rated by "females" between 18-29.
I don't know what these mean, I'm 24 and virgin. IDK how accurate this shit is.
Your smartness and trustworthiness scores are directly correlated with your attractiveness score.I got like 3 for smart, was legit pissed. I probably IQ mog every single woman who rated me the little cunts.
And you claim that I mog you JFL. We are looksmatched.View attachment 135640
For attractive, it was 6 with "no", 3 with "somewhat" and 1 with "yes". Maybe she will date me or just someone spamming random options because they want to see their own results...
I'd say you mog me, though I don't remember exactly how you look. Photofeeler is really not very accurate, and it'd be very unlikely to get all "No" resultsAnd you claim that I mog you JFL. We are looksmatched.
Um actually silly inkel if you are smarter it makes you more attractiveYour smartness and trustworthiness scores are directly correlated with your attractiveness score.
I guess I can't say it isn't good, but a couple pictures on photofeeler doesn't really inspire confidence in a 24 year old virgin.How 5.8 is not good?
Neither of us get any matches on Tinder or any respect from femoids that isn't paid for with cash, so it's splitting hairs imho.I'd say you mog me, though I don't remember exactly how you look. Photofeeler is really not very accurate, and it'd be very unlikely to get all "No" results
Um actually silly inkel if you are smarter it makes you more attractive
battery charge mogs meHahaha just signed into my old account because of this thread and thought, "I'll get some more votes to get a better score. Fucking
Ahahahahah
Fucking went on the free option and this is the FIRST THING I SEE
View attachment 135638
I get a bit annoyed when it's not on 100% tbhbattery charge mogs me
I guess I can't say it isn't good, but a couple pictures on photofeeler doesn't really inspire confidence in a 24 year old virgin.
I did tinder 3 times in 2 different cities (Toledo, Ohio and Cleveland, Ohio) as well as bumble once and didn't get anything. Swiped right on about 40-50% of women, maybe more. Didn't swipe on obvious bots or what not. Only really did it when under the influence of alcohol or benzos. Considering trying online dating more traditionally one day but I want to auschwitz-max before I try it again.My friend, this is a little strange, have you tried dating apps? you're not a manlet yes?
Even if the scores weren't reliable, you would still be somehow average.
I did tinder 3 times in 2 different cities (Toledo, Ohio and Cleveland, Ohio) as well as bumble once and didn't get anything. Swiped right on about 40-50% of women, maybe more. Didn't swipe on obvious bots or what not. Only really did it when under the influence of alcohol or benzos. Considering trying online dating more traditionally one day but I want to auschwitz-max before I try it again.
I am kind of a manlet. I'm 5'9.75" (177.8cm), which isn't incredibly short, but is about 1.5" shorter than the average white man in ohio. So I'm categorically short for my area/race/age. 5'9.75" isn't death-tier short, but it does me no favors. IIRC I lied on my tinder and said I was 5'11.
Because they recognized the trick...Ok...
I understand, basically the photofeeler site does not work, I put models, Richard Ramirez and other people and they received medium or below average, wtf.
Because they recognized the trick...
Me too.Ive never tried it
How many votes?
How many votes?
It doesnt countOnly two, needs credits to get him more votes.
No need credits. Increas carma by voting for other photos and you will get responces. 1 vote is made by botOnly two, needs credits to get him more votes.
I see that even on sites like lookism and looksmax people still rate wrong, so this is no surprise.