L
laanda
posts that seek to be liked are gay
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2021
- Posts
- 1,444
TLDR Be based. Do not let bias influence you and let you ignore reality. Otherwise, you are dragging down the logical nature of what it means to be blackpilled
I legitimately believe this forum has voluntarily changed the definition of blackpill from a philosophy to a handful of opinions, thinks that if you believe them, you are blackpilled, even if you admit and proudly state that you are biased towards other things. In my first thread about this, people said saying this means I deny the looks pill, which is insane, because this theory doesn't, at all. But, like copers who are coping, people rationalize, and look for weasely ways to ignore the truth.
this is from the incel wiki. I know that because it is from the incel wiki, it is said to be about dating. But you should not learn philosophy from a wiki. Fundamentally, the bluepill is to live in the comforting lie. The dating market is the most popular lie. The redpill is to accept but think it can be fixed. The blackpill is to think it cannot be fixed. That's it. And they apply, to EVERYTHING.
read the second paragraph.
You know what the problem is? You don't have to be unbiased to sign up here. This leads to something. Humans hate uncomfortable reality. So the majority of users that join, have giant copes that make them feel better. So, the forum favours those copes.
I had a guy argue with me that women cannot be intelligent. As in, just, intelligence, and none of them. The foid in school who aced all the tests? A retard. You IQ mogged her. Two actually, and the vast majority of replies in that thread agreed with them. But ask yourself. Does that reality comfort you? Does that reality benefit the forum?
Ask yourself something else. Is reading this and not liking something because it makes the forum look bad and does not align with our beliefs, and that is the reason you hate it, bluepilled? What do lookism deniers do? They hate things that make them look bad and do not align with their beliefs. Oh no! We cannot give IT fuel we got something wrong! Who the fuck CARES truth > all. We should not only post things that make us look good. This example is UNCOMFORTABLE. You read this and go 'damn that sucks but its not benefitting me so I will keep thinking it'. Does it benefit you to think they're all incapable of being intelligent? Does it make the example make sense that they are IRRATIONAL? I put this forward, repeatedly. Users go 'no no no they have to be both.' Why? Does it make no sense that foid can outpreform them in intelligence tests, and the response is, 'IQ tests mean nothing, a 226 iq woman is unintelligent'? COPE bro they're irrational, the comforting reality, is that they're also retarded. What about how every genius ever had a high IQ? To deny this, is to avoid reality by coming up with dodges. It sounds identical to what bluepillers do.
I like this example because if you refuse to accept it, you know you're a bluepiller. open and shut case of someone looking at facts, getting mad at them, and tryna rationalize around it. Again, just because people are really biased... does it matter that this makes us look bad? And is that a valid reason to not agree? COPE. That is IDENTICAL to what lookism deniers do towards blackpill.
I get this is an anti forum post. 'Muh boo hoo let us cope and believe the best thing, at all times. JBB JBW. I'm neither so i benefit.' But it should not matter that this is an anti forum post. Is it TRUE? Yes? Then . Uncomfortable reality, users are copers. If you have such nonexistant rationality, that that is what you came here to do, then consider yourself a bluepiller. To me, and I cannot communicate this, but to me, this is someone saying 'let me be bluepilled and in denial of reality when it benefits me'.
I sense there is a profound, level, of resistance to this idea based on the forum having to be right. We HAVE to be right about everything. So ideas like this are opposed on a level I cannot imagine. What it reminds me of is my own thoughts on lookism denial. That it is SO. Costly. For normies. That they can even KNOW it is true, and still just move on. Accept it's wrong. And still believe it. That is what I sense. And I think most users will not even care if this is true.
Again, this is only one particularly obvious example, and I get that some users will think 'ur saying it to defend women' but i am not. It's just proof. It is a case of someone being INCAPABLE of seeing what is true, because they do not like it. STRONGLY. So they just rationalize a lie. They are not capable, of seeing, if it is true or not. That is BLUEPILL and it is how the bluepill works. And it has to be anti-forum, as that is the meaning of this post.
Here's a more forum friendly one users often cope with; your foid family members are no better than other foids. Mommy rode the carousel. Many users hate their sisters but I also see some who can't bring themselves to because 'muh family'. I get into so many arguments here. Half the time I'm on the 'based side' because I fellate the interest of the forum. Half the time im on the 'cringe side' because I do not. Truthfully, I just lack bias, and what based actually means, is to not be influenced, not to agree with you.
Some users can accept this brutal pill. Some cope 'no, my mum, and all our mums, happen to be coincidentally the single foid on earth who did not.' COPE JFL
The other one I often give is users coping a 2.5/10 face can ascend if hes NT or white or whatever. LMAO deny the lookspill much. My philosophy always, always, adheres to the looks pill. With 0 exceptions made, that are non truths I simply prefer not to accept, and so cannot recognise are lies.
May i remind us that the tone, statement, and purpose, of all high IQ threads on this forum, is being rational, and looking at facts. They speak of looks, and we go 'yes, rationality. That is my philosophy, be rational.' That is what we value here. And I agree, because in terms of incel causation, what benefits us is also CORRECT. But when it doesn't benefit us. Then, we just fucking cope. So what is this? a forum for what benefits us? Or are we actually rational?
obligatory @nice_try tag. You may disagree with me brocel. But I know you hate copers on this forum too, so I tag
@MRHK_57
I legitimately believe this forum has voluntarily changed the definition of blackpill from a philosophy to a handful of opinions, thinks that if you believe them, you are blackpilled, even if you admit and proudly state that you are biased towards other things. In my first thread about this, people said saying this means I deny the looks pill, which is insane, because this theory doesn't, at all. But, like copers who are coping, people rationalize, and look for weasely ways to ignore the truth.
this is from the incel wiki. I know that because it is from the incel wiki, it is said to be about dating. But you should not learn philosophy from a wiki. Fundamentally, the bluepill is to live in the comforting lie. The dating market is the most popular lie. The redpill is to accept but think it can be fixed. The blackpill is to think it cannot be fixed. That's it. And they apply, to EVERYTHING.
read the second paragraph.
If we do what is said in the second paragraph, we are hypocrites. and we do not have to do it. Because we're right about looks ffs we do not have to do this at all. It's just inflatitory cope. And the reason it is, is because it comes down to what the users want to do. It's just a shame, that the fact we are fucking right about looks, gets left to the wayside in favour of people coping everything has to put them in a good light. If users were less selfish, we'd have thousands more members, we would be known as giga high IQ, unbiased blackpillers.The bluepill is pill jargon for unquestionably accepting what the normie fakestream media, similar conventional sources, and associated platitudes (i.e. chadsplaining) have to say about the dating scene. A bluepiller is someone who holds bluepill (i.e. fakestream) beliefs
The bluepill has developed to mean an inability to see nuance, a belief in the just-world fallacy, accompanied by virtue signaling, being unenlightened to the unpleasant realities of the world—thereby maintaining the status quo and their argumentum ad populum proposition. It is the preference of believing in comforting or convenient tropes, especially when it concerns a person's world view, with emphasis on the pretense or opinion that goes contrary to the research
You know what the problem is? You don't have to be unbiased to sign up here. This leads to something. Humans hate uncomfortable reality. So the majority of users that join, have giant copes that make them feel better. So, the forum favours those copes.
I had a guy argue with me that women cannot be intelligent. As in, just, intelligence, and none of them. The foid in school who aced all the tests? A retard. You IQ mogged her. Two actually, and the vast majority of replies in that thread agreed with them. But ask yourself. Does that reality comfort you? Does that reality benefit the forum?
Ask yourself something else. Is reading this and not liking something because it makes the forum look bad and does not align with our beliefs, and that is the reason you hate it, bluepilled? What do lookism deniers do? They hate things that make them look bad and do not align with their beliefs. Oh no! We cannot give IT fuel we got something wrong! Who the fuck CARES truth > all. We should not only post things that make us look good. This example is UNCOMFORTABLE. You read this and go 'damn that sucks but its not benefitting me so I will keep thinking it'. Does it benefit you to think they're all incapable of being intelligent? Does it make the example make sense that they are IRRATIONAL? I put this forward, repeatedly. Users go 'no no no they have to be both.' Why? Does it make no sense that foid can outpreform them in intelligence tests, and the response is, 'IQ tests mean nothing, a 226 iq woman is unintelligent'? COPE bro they're irrational, the comforting reality, is that they're also retarded. What about how every genius ever had a high IQ? To deny this, is to avoid reality by coming up with dodges. It sounds identical to what bluepillers do.
I like this example because if you refuse to accept it, you know you're a bluepiller. open and shut case of someone looking at facts, getting mad at them, and tryna rationalize around it. Again, just because people are really biased... does it matter that this makes us look bad? And is that a valid reason to not agree? COPE. That is IDENTICAL to what lookism deniers do towards blackpill.
I get this is an anti forum post. 'Muh boo hoo let us cope and believe the best thing, at all times. JBB JBW. I'm neither so i benefit.' But it should not matter that this is an anti forum post. Is it TRUE? Yes? Then . Uncomfortable reality, users are copers. If you have such nonexistant rationality, that that is what you came here to do, then consider yourself a bluepiller. To me, and I cannot communicate this, but to me, this is someone saying 'let me be bluepilled and in denial of reality when it benefits me'.
I sense there is a profound, level, of resistance to this idea based on the forum having to be right. We HAVE to be right about everything. So ideas like this are opposed on a level I cannot imagine. What it reminds me of is my own thoughts on lookism denial. That it is SO. Costly. For normies. That they can even KNOW it is true, and still just move on. Accept it's wrong. And still believe it. That is what I sense. And I think most users will not even care if this is true.
Again, this is only one particularly obvious example, and I get that some users will think 'ur saying it to defend women' but i am not. It's just proof. It is a case of someone being INCAPABLE of seeing what is true, because they do not like it. STRONGLY. So they just rationalize a lie. They are not capable, of seeing, if it is true or not. That is BLUEPILL and it is how the bluepill works. And it has to be anti-forum, as that is the meaning of this post.
Here's a more forum friendly one users often cope with; your foid family members are no better than other foids. Mommy rode the carousel. Many users hate their sisters but I also see some who can't bring themselves to because 'muh family'. I get into so many arguments here. Half the time I'm on the 'based side' because I fellate the interest of the forum. Half the time im on the 'cringe side' because I do not. Truthfully, I just lack bias, and what based actually means, is to not be influenced, not to agree with you.
Some users can accept this brutal pill. Some cope 'no, my mum, and all our mums, happen to be coincidentally the single foid on earth who did not.' COPE JFL
The other one I often give is users coping a 2.5/10 face can ascend if hes NT or white or whatever. LMAO deny the lookspill much. My philosophy always, always, adheres to the looks pill. With 0 exceptions made, that are non truths I simply prefer not to accept, and so cannot recognise are lies.
May i remind us that the tone, statement, and purpose, of all high IQ threads on this forum, is being rational, and looking at facts. They speak of looks, and we go 'yes, rationality. That is my philosophy, be rational.' That is what we value here. And I agree, because in terms of incel causation, what benefits us is also CORRECT. But when it doesn't benefit us. Then, we just fucking cope. So what is this? a forum for what benefits us? Or are we actually rational?
obligatory @nice_try tag. You may disagree with me brocel. But I know you hate copers on this forum too, so I tag
@MRHK_57