Aren´t you guys tired of the same alliteration of mass-produced articles discussing the issues regarding contemporary manliness? In one hand you have conservative grifters (usually Republican politicians that went to Yale law school and are rich) talking about some apparent Christian virtue of "protecting those you love," then you have the typical leftist oversocialized foid who wants to present an "empathetic" approach filled with feminized speak (therapeutic language), ultimately highlighting that those supposedly "lost young men" are both out of her grasp and out of her hands.
Finally, both versions are just two sides of the same coin: they both wish to domesticate young men. To the conservatives we should ask if there is still something worth protecting, and the short and obvious answer is that no. The domestic-conservative lifestyle is no longer here and not worth pursuing, not even possible when metropolitan women actually make more money than men, maintaining a so-called "traditional" marital arrangement under the present circumstances is laughable. Additionally, domesticity might not be a universally meaningful system, which is why the heroic is often opposed to the domestic.
There´s nothing to say about the leftists version of this worthless speech. Simply, the "model" that they offer is lame, boring, and sheepish, and only possible for already highly-feminized individuals who need to deal with educated women and work with the all-watching eyes of HR or Title IX departments on their backs.
I think is okay if we simply decide to be lazy and losers, that should be our flag, and instead of gymaxxing we should do welfaremaxxing: we should turn ourselves into parasitic beings just for the sake of being annoying.
Finally, both versions are just two sides of the same coin: they both wish to domesticate young men. To the conservatives we should ask if there is still something worth protecting, and the short and obvious answer is that no. The domestic-conservative lifestyle is no longer here and not worth pursuing, not even possible when metropolitan women actually make more money than men, maintaining a so-called "traditional" marital arrangement under the present circumstances is laughable. Additionally, domesticity might not be a universally meaningful system, which is why the heroic is often opposed to the domestic.
There´s nothing to say about the leftists version of this worthless speech. Simply, the "model" that they offer is lame, boring, and sheepish, and only possible for already highly-feminized individuals who need to deal with educated women and work with the all-watching eyes of HR or Title IX departments on their backs.
I think is okay if we simply decide to be lazy and losers, that should be our flag, and instead of gymaxxing we should do welfaremaxxing: we should turn ourselves into parasitic beings just for the sake of being annoying.
Last edited:
