Pinpoint
Banned
-
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2018
- Posts
- 6,717
I don't think women much care. It's not their ideal. If some white foid gets mudsharking with niggers its because of BBC masculine genes, but not because he acts masculine. But if there is masculinity in wigger culture/ wigger reflexes then that's not mutually inclusive, or reserved for being a hick.
Women in the tinder, social media age don't give care to men who have to posit value through extreme means of a house/ car/ etc. Those are compensatories if the person does not have the essentialities (such as looks, or reflexes/ competence/ genobased traits).
Idiolibervulgarchy (individual - idio, freedom - liber, mundanity - vulgar). The essentials of escapeing and being above mundanity are what girls want, and they're intuitively wired to see if a guy is compensating in any other possible way.
it is more a part of the needle-thread-effect, NTE for a man to be distinguished because of good genes than anything based in what is changeable.
(NTE is where it is difficult to strike a harmony because of things liable to give way, not be done, and getting good genes is a slow and hit or miss process).
Needlethreadarchy is more important when discerning what traits will make you desirable overall than your utility. Rednecks are all about utility but have no grace, class, gentility.
Women want chad, pretty boys and utility wrapped in one.
But looks are the more difficult needlethreadarchal component to go for than being buff at the gym since most people can probably do that, or women can feel it. So it doesn't make you as ethereal a person.
Most girls want prettyboys, refinement, sculpt when they get with a bad boy nowadays. Not with someone who has to sacrifice so much for their physique like gymcels. In fact needing to do that to get anywhere shows inadequacy.
Women know most men intuit that men who got laid back before they were in highschool, or emotionally evolved got so because of their good genes, and they didn't even work on themselves. The people working on themselves know this and are trying to find distinguishment to outdo that.
Women love sociopaths, or those who have the tyrannarchal (tyranny hierarchy) value in life. And it is more characteristically tyrannical for someone to thrive in chaos (not working on themselves) than someone who has to uptightly create order.
Rednecks are low class, and outdated, and BBC can outmasculine them because of athleticism, cock, and hicks have backwards views that give women low power. I don't know what all of you might think is redeeming about them.
NEEDLE THREAD EFFECT.
Women are not just picking men like selecting their favorite food on a restaurant menu. They are litterally choosing between sweaters woven to perfection and judging men on a microscale as that.
Women in the tinder, social media age don't give care to men who have to posit value through extreme means of a house/ car/ etc. Those are compensatories if the person does not have the essentialities (such as looks, or reflexes/ competence/ genobased traits).
Idiolibervulgarchy (individual - idio, freedom - liber, mundanity - vulgar). The essentials of escapeing and being above mundanity are what girls want, and they're intuitively wired to see if a guy is compensating in any other possible way.
it is more a part of the needle-thread-effect, NTE for a man to be distinguished because of good genes than anything based in what is changeable.
(NTE is where it is difficult to strike a harmony because of things liable to give way, not be done, and getting good genes is a slow and hit or miss process).
Needlethreadarchy is more important when discerning what traits will make you desirable overall than your utility. Rednecks are all about utility but have no grace, class, gentility.
Women want chad, pretty boys and utility wrapped in one.
But looks are the more difficult needlethreadarchal component to go for than being buff at the gym since most people can probably do that, or women can feel it. So it doesn't make you as ethereal a person.
Most girls want prettyboys, refinement, sculpt when they get with a bad boy nowadays. Not with someone who has to sacrifice so much for their physique like gymcels. In fact needing to do that to get anywhere shows inadequacy.
Women know most men intuit that men who got laid back before they were in highschool, or emotionally evolved got so because of their good genes, and they didn't even work on themselves. The people working on themselves know this and are trying to find distinguishment to outdo that.
Women love sociopaths, or those who have the tyrannarchal (tyranny hierarchy) value in life. And it is more characteristically tyrannical for someone to thrive in chaos (not working on themselves) than someone who has to uptightly create order.
Rednecks are low class, and outdated, and BBC can outmasculine them because of athleticism, cock, and hicks have backwards views that give women low power. I don't know what all of you might think is redeeming about them.
NEEDLE THREAD EFFECT.
Women are not just picking men like selecting their favorite food on a restaurant menu. They are litterally choosing between sweaters woven to perfection and judging men on a microscale as that.
Last edited: