Blackpill What is the narrative the left say about nonchad whites, and their level of white privilege?

[Pinpoint]

There is no way in fuck that a poindexter 5'6 with glasses and balding has more davantages than gigatyrone.
So what in the fuck do you think, if you forward/ file the factors of these things over to libtards will they say/ remark about beta whites who do not have the same prowess/ privilege/ distinciton as a 6'+ aryan chad.

 

[Deleted member 20207]

Libtards argue that white incels are still privileged, by saying they are just ”E-N-T-I-T-L-E-D to sex and don't understand any real misery”.

 

[Deleted member 20056]

The left doesn't believe in, or at least they don't talk about, the distinction between incel and Chad. There is one exception, they will occasionally recognize that some people are very attractive (Chad) and some people are very unattractive (incels) because of unjust, racist and fatphobic beauty standards.

The left really isn't interested in engaging in anything genetic, unless it's a social issue they put it aside because it can't be included in their utopian project. That's why they insist on race and gender being social constructs and IncelTears don't acknowledge the ugliest incels among us—they only want to focus on social things like male entitlement and whatever.

When you engage with the left you have to realize that you're not talking to people who are interested in what's true. They won't even tell you what they really think because discussion and debate is all about control and optics for them. That's why they have no issue whatsoever with deplatforming and all that.

 

[Deleted member 18214]

The left doesn't believe in, or at least they don't talk about, the distinction between incel and Chad. There is one exception, they will occasionally recognize that some people are very attractive (Chad) and some people are very unattractive (incels) because of unjust, racist and fatphobic beauty standards.

The left really isn't interested in engaging in anything genetic, unless it's a social issue they put it aside because it can't be included in their utopian project. That's why they insist on race and gender being social constructs and IncelTears don't acknowledge the ugliest incels among us—they only want to focus on social things like male entitlement and whatever.

When you engage with the left you have to realize that you're not talking to people who are interested in what's true. They won't even tell you what they really think, discussion and debate is all about control and optics for them. That's why they have no issue whatsoever with deplatforming and all that.

High iq

 

[Deleted member 20056]

Expanding on what I just wrote, I know a couple of very left wing former SJW types who became disillusioned with 'the movement' and they tell me this is how it is. They look at someone like Chris Chan becoming a transgender lesbian and they take issue with it, it makes them suspicious, they find it disgusting, but only behind multiple closed doors because in their minds if you don't accept the validity of Chris Chan's womanhood, you damage the cause of all transgender people because you've shown it's acceptable to question such a thing. When they celebrate punching a nazi it's the same thing, it's not about just punching a nazi, that in itself doesn't matter, it's the social consequence of their threat that goes "if you're anywhere near being a nazi we will attack you" that they care about. This is one of the few things they will openly talk about.

This why the left is obsessed with "becoming united", which means to favor a universal dogma because they're not truth-seeking so they don't want to get bogged down in debate they can't weaponize. It's a way to stop infighting and save their energy for external targets, and it broadens their appeal by simplifying their message.