Venting What if darwinism isn't 100% right and there is a different kind of life after death?

[Cybersex is our hope]

https://www.enzopennetta.it/2017/05/evolution-ert-comes-the-dawn-of-a-scientific-revolution/
He is a very interesting anti-darwinist scientist. I came to laugh at him but i have to admit he makes really good points: saying how micro-evolution is perfectly reproducible and it follows the natural selection and adaptation but macro evolution (evolving from a species to another) isn't nor we have actual evidence for it.
He challenged evolutionary biologists to debate and they never came (wuot).
The point is: even if his objections are true this isn't the proof that creationism is the answer to the question. Also how comes that with the new model he (and his student) proposes there are still unexplicable things like foids behaving like animals if left free to run wild? Shouldn't we act as a separate entity from animals? Shouldn't foid have still some "humanity" if left free to go (like, who knows, showing empathy for weak men)
It also makes me wonder about the origins of species and humans. Since i don't think creationism is valuable at all, even if radical darwinism is rejected, this makes us thinking about the possibility of a very weird origin of the macro-species and even the possibility of life after death. If there's a conscious life after death (but not the gross one that traditional catholicism/abramitic religions teach us) that would maybe help us cope better with being genetic dead end while also whitnessing the end of our culture (speaking for europecel here).

This is really extreme venting. Just to chat about some bizarre crap.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

I think about it now again as a faint possibility, but I always come back to realizing it's almost certainly not true.

This mindset is totally forced upon you by kikes and liberalism. We had numerous cases here where "paranormal debunkers" have declined the invitation to a pubblic debate or conversation with those whom they call "conspiracy theorists" "pseudo-scientists" etc.
We have various signs about another possible "reality" yet we still don't have a definite proof

PS: "Just wait for your biological death, bro" KEK

 

[Deleted member 17599]

 

[Napoleon de Jizzbal]

Evolution doesnt deny metaphysics, just jewish religions with their fairytales of creation

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

Low effor low iq post.
TRASHBIN NOW

Evolution doesnt deny metaphysics, just jewish religions with their fairytales of creation

Yep but if evolution (macro evolution not micro) isn't true then the mystery continuees to deepen KEKEKEK

 

[StaroRavager]

Darwinism says nothing on the subject of the afterlife

 

[Deleted member 1039]

We already know that theres an afterlife because everyone has a soul that resides on another plane of existence yet still within your head. Your body is just a vessel that you pilot during this test called life. However for alot of people, the test is rigged from the start.

 

[TheRealChincel]

An afterlife terrifies me more than merely not existing.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

llop

Massive cope. I can't take you seriously after you said that.

I can't take you seriously if you can't even understand written text. I said Pennetta said so not me. He is ready to debate this shit but not a single evolutionist ever accepted the challenge. I myself went there expecting another creationist weirdo. That wasn't the case

An afterlife terrifies me more than merely not existing.

The grotesque catholic afterlife yes. A rational "holographic" afterlife isn't terrifying but just interesting to be investigated

 

[Deleted member 10531]

low-iq, as if microevolution wouldn't lead to macroevolution on a long perioid of time. The evolution of a species is like a color gradient.

Also, also low-iq, as darwinism doesn't claim that there isn't life after death, darwinism is simply Darwin's look at biological evolution

 

[Mad Baron]

Evolution doesnt deny metaphysics, just jewish religions with their fairytales of creation

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

We already know that theres an afterlife because everyone has a soul that resides on another plane of existence yet still within your head. Your body is just a vessel that you pilot during this test called life. However for alot of people, the test is rigged from the start.

Chad will just have his biological body go to shit like yours and rot. His joy is futile and stupidly short. Just wait for this biological round to end. This is how life happened to be for us this time

Ps: I'll stop larping as a whitepilled Buddha now haha

Forgive me for thinking that you believe what you say is a good point. I am not surprised that nobody wants to talk to this guy. You seem like the kind of person who gets recruited into cults.

I was referring to the fact that I thought something different about him and then I was proven wrong. Get it? If he really says such dumb shit everyone should look forward to have a debate with him on YT or national TV and just shut him down once and for all (and boosting his own image). Fact is no one ever even accepted. I look at fact, not what MUST be consisered truth. If no one dares to openly debate him I'll consider him as someone who raises valid points. When they will prove him wrong I'll just go back believing what I believed. Facts

And anti-evolutionism doesn't give any evidence of creationism nor of the Christian god. However atheistic cuck just desperately want to paint it that way

low-iq, as if microevolution wouldn't lead to macroevolution on a long perioid of time. The evolution of a species is like a color gradient.

Also, also low-iq, as darwinism doesn't claim that there isn't life after death, darwinism is simply Darwin's look at biological evolution

Low iq at not understanding micro evolution implies only changing or degrading the genome and we have plenty of examples about that while macro evolution implies ADDING new informations to the genome; something we never managed to witness nor reproduce

Evolution doesnt deny metaphysics, just jewish religions with their fairytales of creation

As I said: anti-Darwinism doesn't prove creationism at all and not to mention the Christian creationism. Many idiots can't differentiate the two things tho

 

[Deleted member 16455]

I don’t believe in any sort of after life

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

I do not think you understand what valid points are.

I do not think you understand what i write and what he said and also the dynamics behind stuff (i mean the debate btw)

 

[Tempus Edax Rerum]

https://www.enzopennetta.it/2017/05/evolution-ert-comes-the-dawn-of-a-scientific-revolution/
He is a very interesting anti-darwinist scientist. I came to laugh at him but i have to admit he makes really good points: saying how micro-evolution is perfectly reproducible and it follows the natural selection and adaptation but macro evolution (evolving from a species to another) isn't nor we have actual evidence for it.
He challenged evolutionary biologists to debate and they never came (wuot).
The point is: even if his objections are true this isn't the proof that creationism is the answer to the question. Also how comes that with the new model he (and his student) proposes there are still unexplicable things like foids behaving like animals if left free to run wild? Shouldn't we act as a separate entity from animals? Shouldn't foid have still some "humanity" if left free to go (like, who knows, showing empathy for weak men)
It also makes me wonder about the origins of species and humans. Since i don't think creationism is valuable at all, even if radical darwinism is rejected, this makes us thinking about the possibility of a very weird origin of the macro-species and even the possibility of life after death. If there's a conscious life after death (but not the gross one that traditional catholicism/abramitic religions teach us) that would maybe help us cope better with being genetic dead end while also whitnessing the end of our culture (speaking for europecel here).

This is really extreme venting. Just to chat about some bizarre crap.

Amazon product ASIN 0486400360
Amazon product ASIN B01G2BOOG6
Amazon product ASIN 0486217620

 

[Deleted member 17883]

Life after death. Reincarnation. None existing. Microscopic cloning. Anything anyone ever thought about when it comes to life and death... Who gives a fuck?. if you have no power to manipulate it before before you die. What is the point of even thinking about it.

It's over, I just support religions especially Islam because its anti degeneracy and anti foids freedom.

 

[DaveBuster]

Darwinism says nothing on the subject of the afterlife

Yeah, these are very different issues.

Me, I was hardcore atheist starting in my teens. I'm still pretty much an atheist, though atheism became an insufferable redditor thing so I wouldn't identify with it. I just have trouble believing there's any kind of god, and certainly not any who's interested in whatever we're doing. Of course, there's no proof that there isn't (can't prove a negative) and there's no proof that we just disappear when we die, so I usually say I'm agnostic now. Maybe I could "believe" in some kind of idea of my lifeforce joining the rest of creation, because that basically is what happens when we die and rot, but that doesn't feel like "religion" to me in any real way, just a woo-woo description of the natural process to help people cope.

Darwinism seems pretty solid to me. It's not inconsistent with the idea of a creator anyways, it's only a problem if you take the jewish bible as a literal story of actual events written by god himself, which some christians started doing because being a retard proves how devoted you are to god or something.

It's over, I just support religions especially Islam because its anti degeneracy and anti foids freedom.

This is where I'm at. Religion was a part of culture and community, and the destruction of all three seems very linked to me. Why consider your part in a line of humans stretching millenia back and which will continue millenia after you die when you could get updoots for your hot take on capeshit drama instead?

 

[NEETAndTidy]

COPEEEEEE

 

[Dionysus]

If theres an afterlife then I want to say fuck you to everyone there for ruining my life

 

[Honeypot]

https://www.enzopennetta.it/2017/05/evolution-ert-comes-the-dawn-of-a-scientific-revolution/
He is a very interesting anti-darwinist scientist. I came to laugh at him but i have to admit he makes really good points: saying how micro-evolution is perfectly reproducible and it follows the natural selection and adaptation but macro evolution (evolving from a species to another) isn't nor we have actual evidence for it.
He challenged evolutionary biologists to debate and they never came (wuot).
The point is: even if his objections are true this isn't the proof that creationism is the answer to the question. Also how comes that with the new model he (and his student) proposes there are still unexplicable things like foids behaving like animals if left free to run wild? Shouldn't we act as a separate entity from animals? Shouldn't foid have still some "humanity" if left free to go (like, who knows, showing empathy for weak men)
It also makes me wonder about the origins of species and humans. Since i don't think creationism is valuable at all, even if radical darwinism is rejected, this makes us thinking about the possibility of a very weird origin of the macro-species and even the possibility of life after death. If there's a conscious life after death (but not the gross one that traditional catholicism/abramitic religions teach us) that would maybe help us cope better with being genetic dead end while also whitnessing the end of our culture (speaking for europecel here).

This is really extreme venting. Just to chat about some bizarre crap.

There can be darwinism and live after death, darwinism explains how life continuously evolve to adapt to their environment, like explaining the water cycle in nature, it have nothing to do with possible life after death.

 

[ryhan]

There can be darwinism and live after death, darwinism explains how life continuously evolve to adapt to their environment, like explaining the water cycle in nature, it have nothing to do with possible life after death.

Exactly darwinism asserts no claim's for the hereafter cause that is not science's job that is a reilgious person's job when will people get this

 

[Cuyen]

An afterlife terrifies me more than merely not existing.

 

[Evildоer]

I want to say fuck you to everyone there for ruining my life

You've just said it to void

 

[78980n]

He is a very interesting anti-darwinist scientist. I came to laugh at him but i have to admit he makes really good points: saying how micro-evolution is perfectly reproducible and it follows the natural selection and adaptation but macro evolution (evolving from a species to another) isn't nor we have actual evidence for it.

This is one of the stupidest arguments against evolution, if given enough time, "micro" evolution will lead to "macro"

Evolutionary theory is akin to Germ theory or Cell theory, which are basically considered facts

 

[Robtical]

Evolution, round earth, dinosaur bones, space, and the moon landing are all hoaxes made up by (((them))) to confuse people and make them believe jew scientists.

 

[Mainländer]

I have lots of qualms with the theory of evolution, especially when it is applied to humans in a short timespan.

Evolution, round earth, dinosaur bones, space, and the moon landing are all hoaxes made up by (((them))) to confuse people and make them believe jew scientists.

I don't know what's true and what's illusion anymore