sneed (not chuck)
Banned
-
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2023
- Posts
- 2,492
Is it not a legitimate way to ascend? It's the only way most people will get laid and start families. Most normies are beta providers. Personally, I would beta provide for a Stacey.
Mods ban this cuck please.
The default state of humankind of men to be beta providers to women tbh. Women are supposed to stay home, look after the home, and raise the children. Things went askew when women embraced sexual promiscuity. I fantasize about finding a virgin that will love me but I know it will never happenI have nothing against them personally; my issue lies with the females who can lead a promiscuous life and still expect to have a beta male provide for them in their later years when their value as a mate has long diminished - their standards will also still be sky-high. It is very annoying. It is never a satisfying feeling, being in a subservient position to a female; she is bolstered to wreck your world by divorce-raping you and rendering all of your hard work null. What man in his right mind would be satisfied with such a role?
Oh yeah same definitely, I would absolutely never entangle myself with anyone who had kids from some other chad. Fuck no.I wouldn't mind fucking a fat single mother but wouldn't want to be roped into bringing up another man's kids, I don't even want kids of my own. They're expensive, annoying and drain all your energy.
Some (not all) incelize their sons
YesIt is delusion.
it's cucked because women can get a job and they out earn menIs it not a legitimate way to ascend? It's the only way most people will get laid and start families. Most normies are beta providers. Personally, I would beta provide for a Stacey.
Nothing wrong if the woman you providing for is giving you good living.Is it not a legitimate way to ascend? It's the only way most people will get laid and start families. Most normies are beta providers. Personally, I would beta provide for a Stacey.
Oh, mein gott! Do you, mister, think, that you arent the same as those filthy 'infidels'? They are savages, ho.. yeah, they can Betray™ Fellow™ Incel™ to get laid. Such devious creatures, no doubt! Only literal Satan' spawn can do that..I
If they are not with us , they are against us . These cucks are not on our side , they will do anything for M'lady and turn on each other for a crumb of stinky fishy tuna pussy .
Talk about circumstances)Nothing wrong if the woman you providing for is giving you good living.
Cooks good food, sucks dick good, washes your clothes, gives you childrenn.
Shieeeettt if I can get a Stacy I will beta provide. But not for a landwhale or sub 4 and below. There I prefer the modern "equal" relationship where the women wears the trousers and goes to work to bring home "MONEY". Fuck providing for s washed up old hag or some roastie with 3-4 kids in tow who i got to provide for as if i am the daddy. I rather masterbate or commit suicide irl.
yeah exactly"circumstances". Call me volcel but providing for a landwhale or old hag is just madness. I rather escortcelTalk about circumstances)
You are good, i personally think that nobody is in the position to give ranks of fakecel-duracell to anyoneyeah exactly"circumstances". Call me volcel but providing for a landwhale or old hag is just madness. I rather escortcel
It's a legitimate way to ascend, only if she is attracted to you. There is nothing wrong in providing. A lot of alpa chads are also providers.Is it not a legitimate way to ascend?
Being a beta provider only made sense when it wasn't legal for foids to cuck you, divorce you and take most of your money. I shouldn't have to explain that here of all places jflIs it not a legitimate way to ascend? It's the only way most people will get laid and start families. Most normies are beta providers. Personally, I would beta provide for a Stacey.