@Stupid Clown
Last edited:
@Stupid Clown
they went on the Final Fantasy direction
fucking soy gas everywhere
Left looks so much better for some reason. I don't know why, but it's visually a lot more appealing.
The older a game gets, the more saturated and nicer the color palette of the game is.
That's why a lot of people reminisce on those tropical setting games that came out in the early 2000s on GameCube and PS2. The colors in those settings were beautiful. Every modern game has a boring shade of gray these days.
Okay boomer
wilds couldve looked so good if they went the rise direction and focused on shit like good designs for characters, areas and monsters instead of hi res everything. mhrise's big new leviathan monster was a badass river dragon that made castles out of mud. mhwilds' new leviathan is a log of shit that spews shit at you.
vs
Good point. There's just something a lot more appealing about the vibrant colors and less realism that made it more appealing than modern games.
Incredible piece of commentary. We’re back in 2019 now
Gonna play Wilds, but lot of nostalgia with the older MH titles. I first got into the series with Freedom 2 on the PSP
Thank you, kind sir
nicer colors i think
Yeah so true. Either grey or brown I think.
low graphics is just high without upscaling.
For some reason I didn't get a notification when you tagged me. Anyways, yeah. The first one looks better because better lighting/effort into art. Wilds uses the RE engine + dynamic lighting which looks like absolute shit. OG Monster Hunter from 1-3 was realistic and much more visually appealing
And ofc, MH Online from 2016 also goes for a more realistic art style and looks better
And ofc, MH Online from 2016 also goes for a more realistic art style and looks better
Rise is more interesting visually. I agree. Their focus on ultra realistic looking monsters with Wilds is body. None of the new monsters look good. Just more blurry homogenous masses to spam attack.
Dynamic lighting needs to be done away with. I don't care if it's more realistic. It's making games absolutely hideous.
I mean, of course game graphics will improve over time.
I do think wokeness and DEI has done a lot of damage though.
I do think wokeness and DEI has done a lot of damage though.
@Spooky_Heejin you are aware that there is also something in between ? Games that dont have stone age graphics and that arent woke yet ?
Because it was developed for the asian market, catering to braindead westerners was a mistake they are obsessed with fake realism which destroys colors and dumbs down the difficulty
We had mix of dynamic and static lights for decades shame that they moved from it and only have fully dynamic lights it was the biggest mistake of gaming in history right after Concord. Stalker 1 or FEAR or GTA IV or Riddick/Doom 3 are the best examples of mixing both lighting techniques in the same rendering pipeline.
View: https://youtu.be/ddG56sXrstw
what the point of your unnecessary high polycount and ultra high res textures when it's all gets spoiled by TAA or some other mud soap form of anti-alliasing
we go so much more advanced and more powerful hardware now than in mid 2010s but graphics aren't 2 times better and it runs like shit
they look horrendous, ugly, detailless and blurry. starting with world and moving on to rise was like a blind man being able to see for the first time. everything was crisp, evident, colourful, and full of character instead of washed out, hyperrealistic and shit-coloured.
compare goss harag to anjanath
both are tough as nails midgame wall-type monsters, but one is way more interesting to fight than the other- and it's the abominable snowman instead of the pink ostrich trex that sneezes fireballs.
i dont care what anyone says, rise is way better and cares way more about the player's time and maximising the amount of fun they have compared to world (except the anomaly hunts, fuck them)
Yea I agree and for instance FIFA 14 >>> FIFA 24 (now called EA Sports FC 24), many agree. Game play wise.
However I don’t think we can just oversimplify it and always blame DEI. Sure, often but often it’s just incompetence. I’m white, straight, male (so not a DEI hire, except I’m very ugly?), doesn’t mean if I studied medicine I’d automatically be a good doctor
It depends on the genre. Also, I didn't expect anyone here to play Monster Hunter. Based. I started with World like a zoomer
For sure but... if you're excluding 70% of candidates just because they're white or asian then of course that's going to mean you generally speaking end up with worse people being hired. Even if there were no racial differences at all.
Fair enough
muh ambient occlusion muh blur muh high quality gaytracing
Herd mentality on zoomers is strong
B
[IMG alt="Bang Chan"]https://data.incels.is/avatars/m/67/67529.jpg?1725254331[/IMG]
Bang Chan
★★★Nigger lyncher
Joined Aug 31, 2024
Last seen A moment ago · Viewing thread What a 10 year difference does to computer graphics.
Posts254Followers
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
