L
It's always funny that if a man does what's normal for a woman it suddenly becomes an expression of moral depravity.
Look at weapon ownership for example.
If a man buys a gun or any other weapon (like a knife/pepper spray) in order to defend himself he gets seen as a coward, no matter the fact that he might be small/narrow-framed/disabled/whatever which would render him unable to defend himself against larger attackers.
If you don't/cannot use your fists as a man in a fight, you get seen as defective - even (or particularly) by those liberal whores and soys that always claim that they want to "dismantle"/"deconstruct" masculinity (but then conveniently always reduce it to its most bare elements like impregnating/pleasuring women or beating someone into submission with bare hands at any other turn).
Every fight involving a gun gets automatically seen as "unfair" by them (while a fist fight is -due to the natural differences- in reaction time/size/frame really the most unfair fight of them all with the gun only functioning as an equalizer of physical force). A man that uses weapons is in their opinion the lowest scum of the earth.
But if a woman does the same thing she gets celebrated, if a woman wants to equalize physical strength differences with a fire arm or any other weapon it's completely ok, although the motivation is the same: Compensating for physical ineptitude via access to a weapon. It's just funny how one thing is an expression of cowardice/worthlessness/failure while the other is seen as a sign of courage/empowerment.
If a woman says she feels more secure with a weapon people applaud her, if a man says the same thing people despise him as a defective/miserable coward and say for example that the knife/gun is his phallic reimbursement/his way of coping with a sexual inadequacy.
And btw: Being against weapons as a non-chad is the most cucked thing you can be, frame/size/able-bodiedness largely determine the outcome of every physical confrontation, training will only supplement what's already pre-defined by birth, worshipping physical strength is another form of archaic chad worshipping, imagine wanting to be beaten by thugs (that women btw fawn over) without the possibility to enforce your own will. Again: Look what liberal whores and soys are doing as a nonchad and do/support exactly the opposite, this is mostly good advice.
Look at weapon ownership for example.
If a man buys a gun or any other weapon (like a knife/pepper spray) in order to defend himself he gets seen as a coward, no matter the fact that he might be small/narrow-framed/disabled/whatever which would render him unable to defend himself against larger attackers.
If you don't/cannot use your fists as a man in a fight, you get seen as defective - even (or particularly) by those liberal whores and soys that always claim that they want to "dismantle"/"deconstruct" masculinity (but then conveniently always reduce it to its most bare elements like impregnating/pleasuring women or beating someone into submission with bare hands at any other turn).
Every fight involving a gun gets automatically seen as "unfair" by them (while a fist fight is -due to the natural differences- in reaction time/size/frame really the most unfair fight of them all with the gun only functioning as an equalizer of physical force). A man that uses weapons is in their opinion the lowest scum of the earth.
But if a woman does the same thing she gets celebrated, if a woman wants to equalize physical strength differences with a fire arm or any other weapon it's completely ok, although the motivation is the same: Compensating for physical ineptitude via access to a weapon. It's just funny how one thing is an expression of cowardice/worthlessness/failure while the other is seen as a sign of courage/empowerment.
If a woman says she feels more secure with a weapon people applaud her, if a man says the same thing people despise him as a defective/miserable coward and say for example that the knife/gun is his phallic reimbursement/his way of coping with a sexual inadequacy.
And btw: Being against weapons as a non-chad is the most cucked thing you can be, frame/size/able-bodiedness largely determine the outcome of every physical confrontation, training will only supplement what's already pre-defined by birth, worshipping physical strength is another form of archaic chad worshipping, imagine wanting to be beaten by thugs (that women btw fawn over) without the possibility to enforce your own will. Again: Look what liberal whores and soys are doing as a nonchad and do/support exactly the opposite, this is mostly good advice.
