Fancy Alcoholic
Living by the name
★★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2020
- Posts
- 12,932
Irrelevant.People will still have sex
We're still gonna be incels tho. And cope if you don't think they're not only gonna let Chads use those artificial wombs just like they only let Chads donate their sperm.Irrelevant.
He didn't say people won't need sex, he said "we"
Again, Irrelevant. He didn't say we weren't going to still be incel.We're still gonna be incels tho. And cope if you don't think they're not only gonna let Chads use those artificial wombs just like they only let Chads donate their sperm.
Or state is afraid that this technology could have soyciety changing implications in the future. War of the clones could strop being SF if this tech was massified.That shows that the State is very much willing to control how people reproduce.
Based gorillacel. The market is by essence barbarian, so it will not stay elitist long. And even if it is, it's only about money, not look.Irrelevant
foids will urge their shill political servants to regulate this into non existence.
We're still gonna be incels tho. And cope if you don't think they're not only gonna let Chads use those artificial wombs just like they only let Chads donate their sperm.
Incel theory filters midwitsPeople will still have sex
foids will urge their shill political servants to regulate this into non existence.
Or state is afraid that this technology could have soyciety changing implications in the future. War of the clones could strop being SF if this tech was massified.
Every government of every country in the world would need to stop the production of artificial wombs for it to be completely "illegal". Look how much the US has shit the bed in the middle east, if some thirdies don't make it illegal we won't be able to do shit about it. And even then, people will probably just make it illegally and the government won't be able to do shit to stop it like how we are losing the war on drugs. Face it, asexual reproduction is coming.Besides, this technology will be heavily regulated so I don't think it would be as disruptive as one might think.
Like in theory you could already pay a woman to carry your child but I doubt the Law lets anyone do that. That shows that the State is very much willing to control how people reproduce.
Technology only disrupts existing norms if the government can't restrict its usage. I don't think it will be the case for artificial wombs.
I think that's one of the reasons globalists want a World government.Look how much the US has shit the bed in the middle east, if some thirdies don't make it illegal we won't be able to do shit about it.