Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Venting We overcame survival off the fittest and because of that we are forced to endure this hellish suffering

Friezacel

Friezacel

Foids, write me on Discord: lauterbach2
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 15, 2023
Posts
30,219
Sometimes i really wish we would still live in cavemen times, at least then nature would quickly select us out and wed be dead in no time due to our inferior gentics and inability to adapt. But now where we dont have to fight for our lives in the wild anymore, we got medicine and the current zeigeist is that every life is precious, we are forced to stay alive under any circumstances. Most countries dont even offer assisted suicide and society gaslights you into staying alive, even though your life has literally no point. We live in a time where people of inferior genetic and defects are forced to stay alive, even though they are a burden to society and cost more money than they can generate.
 
You can always do the thing, ya know.
 
Sometimes i really wish we would still live in cavemen times, at least then nature would quickly select us out and wed be dead in no time due to our inferior gentics and inability to adapt.
I wouldn't be dead in no time. I'm highly intelligent, a good problem solver, have good reflexes and physical skills and I can adapt without a problem. I would be dominating and breed 10 woman at the same time.
The only reason why I can't have a gf today is that I'm ugly. I'm good in everything else.


we are forced to stay alive under any circumstances.
No, you aren't. You're free to jump off a bridge or in front of the train anytime you want.
 
Sometimes i really wish we would still live in cavemen times, at least then nature would quickly select us out and wed be dead in no time due to our inferior gentics and inability to adapt. But now where we dont have to fight for our lives in the wild anymore, we got medicine and the current zeigeist is that every life is precious, we are forced to stay alive under any circumstances. Most countries dont even offer assisted suicide and society gaslights you into staying alive, even though your life has literally no point. We live in a time where people of inferior genetic and defects are forced to stay alive, even though they are a burden to society and cost more money than they can generate.
Arnt there still hierarchies among hunter gatherers though?
Us humans are not solitary creatures.
 
Arnt there still hierarchies among hunter gatherers though?
Us humans are not solitary creatures.
Exactly, we would have all been the beta cavemen. Meanwhile the ogres would dominating, and it would be even worse since they can get away with more things back then.
 
Survival instinct says no
Right, i guess i semi agree with most of your points. There is a lot of hypocratic behaviour in regards to the virtues of the modern zeitgeist you mentioned. All life being precious for example only really effectively applies to very specific groups of people. It's mostly just unsubstantial virtue signaling.

We don't throw deformed kids of cliffs anymore that's true but at the same time normies support insane amount of low tier men dying and suffering in conflicts and bad economic situations.
 
its not survival of the fittest tho

at least not anymore

its more like, survival of the prettiest

sexual appeal easily beats strength when it comes to passing on your genes now

back then, it was always the stronger male that would get the female, males would literally fight over females or something similar

but we're no longer living in anarchy, so its just whoever the female chooses
 

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxdS_w5uBBI

its not survival of the fittest tho

at least not anymore

its more like, survival of the prettiest

sexual appeal easily beats strength when it comes to passing on your genes now

back then, it was always the stronger male that would get the female, males would literally fight over females or something similar

but we're no longer living in anarchy, so its just whoever the female chooses
 
Exactly, we would have all been the beta cavemen. Meanwhile the ogres would dominating, and it would be even worse since they can get away with more things back then.
Not neccessarily. If you are just a bit off the chart, you might still stay in the tribe as a beta. But if you hit the entire unlucky jackpot (ugly, short, framecel + autistic) then there is also a good chane youll get completely excluded and outcasted from the tribe, which almost guaranteedly leads to your death
 
'survival of the fittest' is always contextual

it depends on the circumstances, there is no such thing as 'fittest' in the abstract

humans probably wouldn't survive at all if they didn't create things and colonize the world, they're not a species that really excels at living in the wild without artificial means

so without 'overcoming' survival of the fittest, humans wouldn't still exist in the first place
 
Go werewolf and go wild (in Red Dead Redemption)
 
All life being precious for example only really effectively applies to very specific groups of people. It's mostly just unsubstantial virtue signaling.
Thats right, they all say how much they care about autistic people, yet when they actually meet one they will treat him like a cockroach.
We don't throw deformed kids of cliffs anymore
The methods have changed, but their mind always stays the same. Deformed kids will just get bullied into oblivion and get excluded from social life
 
males would literally fight over females or something similar
They still do, its just the methods that have changed, similar to what i said in my previous comment
 
No survival of the fittest for your face.
 
It's like the meta has change. Survival of da fittest still applies. It's survival of who fits in to their environment the best.

But I see your point about the consequences of not fitting in.
 
Why did i laugh at this shit, its over for my brainrot
While you are laughing at this brainrot, chad is having a party and getting loads of sex.
 
'survival of the fittest' is always contextual

it depends on the circumstances, there is no such thing as 'fittest' in the abstract

humans probably wouldn't survive at all if they didn't create things and colonize the world, they're not a species that really excels at living in the wild without artificial means

so without 'overcoming' survival of the fittest, humans wouldn't still exist in the first place
Soy-scientists have developed this habit of viewing humans through the lens of (wild) animals typically to justify male disposability. It seems to have rubbed off on normies.
 
Soy-scientists have developed this habit of viewing humans through the lens of (wild) animals typically to justify male disposability. It seems to have rubbed off on normies.
We still are animals and it would be naive to claim otherwise. Our bodies may have evolved, but our brain is still very primitive, our behaviour is not too different from apes or other mammals
 
It's like the meta has change. Survival of da fittest still applies. It's survival of who fits in to their environment the best.

But I see your point about the consequences of not fitting in.
My point is that back in the day survival of the fittest was much more brutal and reckless and if you dont have the right genes you're pretty much a dead man. Nowadays you can be born with shitty genes and still stay alive because of the things i mentioned in my OP
 
Soy-scientists have developed this habit of viewing humans through the lens of (wild) animals typically to justify male disposability. It seems to have rubbed off on normies.
What even makes genes "good" in the first place?
 
What even makes genes "good" in the first place?
Good genes equal good health. You cant have bad genes and look healthy. Females select for healthy males and not disease ridden males
 
Good genes equal good health. You cant have bad genes and look healthy. Females select for healthy males and not disease ridden males
You can have genetic disorders like Huntington's disease and appear fine on the outside. Meanwhile things like acne have no lethal effects.
 
Soy-scientists have developed this habit of viewing humans through the lens of (wild) animals typically to justify male disposability. It seems to have rubbed off on normies.
high IQ
 
You can have genetic disorders like Huntington's disease and appear fine on the outside
Stop cherrypicking with some niche diseases that barely anyone has, you know what i mean
Meanwhile things like acne has no lethal effects.
There is also sexual selection, not every trait has to have a purpose for survival, some traits are liked or disliked just because the female likes or dislikes it
 
While you are laughing at this brainrot, chad is having a party and getting loads of sex.
Im happy to know that youre sarcastic, so many fags here who write this shit over and over unironically
 
Im happy to know that youre sarcastic, so many fags here who write this shit over and over unironically
I mainly talk sarcasticly nowadays. It bores me to death taking this shit too seriously.
 
What even makes genes "good" in the first place?
usually nothing, genes are selected by circumstance and chance over millions of years

events like the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs probably played a major role in evolution, and are a matter of chance rather than just biological quality

many genes have both 'negative' and 'positive' effects, and might be valued for one thing but are a hindrance for others or are resource-intensive. in different circumstances, the same genes can either survive or become a serious disadvantage
 
I mainly talk sarcasticly nowadays. It bores me to death taking this shit too seriously.
I get whERre you are from, i always used a bit irony and sarcasam, but it definitely increased ovER time. NevER lose your smile boyo :society:
 
Last edited:
I mainly talk sarcasticly nowadays. It bores me to death taking this shit too seriously.
I mainly talk seriously because I believe that sarcasm is duplicitous
 
You can have genetic disorders like Huntington's disease and appear fine on the outside. Meanwhile things like acne have no lethal effects.
sometimes there are genetic diseases like sickle cell anemia which can be actively selected for as well

evolution often leads to negative traits being favoured for incremental advantages in a given location or climate
 
I get whERre you are from, i always used a bit irony and sarcasam, but it definitely increased ovER time. NevER lose your smile boyo :society:
Being blackpilled for almost half a decade does things I guess. It's the same old shit. I only feel apathy towards blackpill talk. I am surprised I wasn't warned a single time yet for my sarcasm.
I mainly talk seriously because I believe that sarcasm is duplicitous
Fair if you still care about this community, I wouldn't talk the way I do if I gave a single shit about the people here.
 
Fair if you still care about this community, I wouldn't talk the way I do if I gave a single shit about the people here.
I don't care about them, I just have a moral aversion to sarcasm and see it as untoward

I'm a conscientious objector
 
high iq i should have been excluded from the tribe and mtgowed my way to suicide because of my shit frame and height and ugly face
 
Still no pussy. Nothings diffrent
 
I should have died as a baby but modern medical science means I have been forced to survive in this hellscape. I can tell nature is angry I'm alive.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top