Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious We incels are failures because of this reason.

wereq

wereq

The End of Happiness Is The Beginning of Truth
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 11, 2022
Posts
35,790
Incels are genetic dead-end losers because we come from weak bloodlines full of incompetent people who failed to keep up and meet the dramatic rise in standards of modern life. In the past decades when conditions were somewhat better (arguably utopic), the availability of improved housing conditions, rising food production, advancements in healthcare, growing opportunities to do easy jobs, and worker collectivization + empowerment caused an increasingly tolerant and complacent society to celebrate the diminishment of natural selection pressures (like disease, natural disaster, and starvation) and hail the conquest of the primal, competitive, lustful, and barbaric side of human beings to herald a new dawn of humanistic slave morality where every life was deemed valuable, thereby enabling weak people to procreate in tremendous numbers. This marked the rise of the bluepill where people imagined they could achieve anything irrespective of their inheritance.

However in reality, the progeny of such weak bloodlines were non-performant and could only survive in utopic high trust social conditions filled with lots of convenience along with the ubiquitous presence strong bedrock of morality restricting the primal, instinctual, and Darwinian side of human nature (blackpill). So when they continued to reproduce that same incompetence and even make it worse by allowing their degenerate, disabled or mentally ill mutant offspring to live, the burden on society grew. Juxtaposed against this trend of growing burdens and nuisance, standards of performance in the economy continue to rise as technologies advanced which increasingly revealed the incompetence of these weak people causing them to fall behind, and now we incels, as the ultimate products of such bloodlines, have arrived at the end of our rope.

There will be no more procreation because societal standards are too high and our populations have grown to unsustainable numbers, both of which have collectively brought back Darwinian conditions of the blackpill. Rising societal standards caused people to emancipate women from domesticity so that they could indulge in the high pleasures of female sexuality, and women realizing the opportunity to subjugate men because of men's high dependence on sex, took full advantage of circumstances to progressively reduce us men to insectoids slaves while simultaneously imposing increasingly harsher standards of sexual selection pressures upon men, which is why we incels are here today.

Inceldom could've been avoided had society not fallen into slave morality. Had society kept incompetent populations in check and restricted women from unleashing a total breakdown of families and communities, incels would not be here, but this kind of precise control and maintenance of social stability requires authoritarianism and homogeneity, something which is totally incongruent with a complacent, tolerant, and decentralized system of governance like democracy (I prefer to call it brokenness) where freedom to fail is more important than honoring obligations.
 
Last edited:
It’s female primal sexual desire vs the restraints of culture (arranged marriage)
 
It’s female primal sexual desire vs the restraints of culture (arranged marriage)
Primal instincts re-emerged despite (or rather because of) social advancements as a result of behavioral sink. When societies become too advanced, they discard moral constraints and replace them with pleasure seeking, and female sexuality is at the forefront of hedonism so therein lies our downfall.
 
I didn't have this. I was born in an amazing body but fucked up my life due to multiple reasons, multiple blunders in my path.

Now I'm a bit ugly or was a bit ugly, but I had a genius brain and an athletes body so I couldn't complain.

My parents were average so idk how my body was so good at old days. Probably luck.
 
Maybe the "weak bloodline" argument could be made 50 years ago, but this is the hardest era to find a partner. Being average is arguably not enough anymore
 
Maybe the "weak bloodline" argument could be made 50 years ago, but this is the hardest era to find a partner. Being average is arguably not enough anymore
The weakness didn't go away. It only grew. Our dysgenics is growing. Our populations are aging, the burden on our healthcare systems is growing. and ability to persevere diminishing. Our communication skills are dying and we are atomizing. Women are becoming more and more parasitic and entitled.
 
Last edited:
The weakness didn't go away. It only grew. Our dysgenics is growing. Our populations are aging, the burden on our healthcare systems is growing. and ability to persevere diminishing. Our communication skills are dying and we are atomizing. Women are becoming more and more parasitic and entitled.
that doesnt contradict anything i've said
 
that doesnt contradict anything i've said
I'm saying that the weakness argument can be made even today. Average doesn't mean that one not weak. The average woman today is a non-performant entitled parasite. The average man today is a soy NPC who is impressionable enough to be endlessly brainwashed by jewish mainstream media.
 
tldr by chatgpt:

This passage expresses a highly critical and deterministic view on the concept of "incels" (involuntary celibates), suggesting that they are the product of societal and genetic failures. It argues that in the past, conditions were better, with more stability and opportunities, which led to a diminishing of natural selection pressures. Over time, this allowed weaker, less competent individuals to thrive, thus perpetuating their weak bloodlines. The passage claims that the rise of a more egalitarian, tolerant society created a situation where weak people could reproduce in large numbers, leading to societal burdens and incompetence. As technology advanced and standards increased, these individuals fell further behind, resulting in the emergence of incels.


The passage also blames the rise of women's emancipation, which it argues led to increased sexual selection pressures on men and a breakdown of traditional family structures. According to the author, this created a situation where men, particularly those deemed incompetent, became marginalized and reduced to a subservient status. The writer contends that this outcome could have been avoided if society had maintained stricter controls and authoritarian measures to prevent the decline of competency and family structures, criticizing democratic systems for prioritizing freedom over stability and responsibility.
 
Maybe the "weak bloodline" argument could be made 50 years ago, but this is the hardest era to find a partner. Being average is arguably not enough anymore
yeah wtf is this eugenicist cucked chad-worshipping view
 
tldr by chatgpt:

This passage expresses a highly critical and deterministic view on the concept of "incels" (involuntary celibates), suggesting that they are the product of societal and genetic failures. It argues that in the past, conditions were better, with more stability and opportunities, which led to a diminishing of natural selection pressures. Over time, this allowed weaker, less competent individuals to thrive, thus perpetuating their weak bloodlines. The passage claims that the rise of a more egalitarian, tolerant society created a situation where weak people could reproduce in large numbers, leading to societal burdens and incompetence. As technology advanced and standards increased, these individuals fell further behind, resulting in the emergence of incels.


The passage also blames the rise of women's emancipation, which it argues led to increased sexual selection pressures on men and a breakdown of traditional family structures. According to the author, this created a situation where men, particularly those deemed incompetent, became marginalized and reduced to a subservient status. The writer contends that this outcome could have been avoided if society had maintained stricter controls and authoritarian measures to prevent the decline of competency and family structures, criticizing democratic systems for prioritizing freedom over stability and responsibility.
:yes: :yes:
 
I have a strong parental bloodline. The excessive studies and the videogames stunted my growth
 
self-deprecation is gay and cucked. you've been mind broken by people who hate you into blaming yourself instead of those who are actively making your life shittier
 
self-deprecation is gay and cucked. you've been mind broken by people who hate you into blaming yourself instead of those who are actively making your life shittier
I don't blame myself. I blame my shitty genetics, bloodline, ancestry, and ecosystem.
 
I don't blame myself. I blame my shitty genetics, bloodline, ancestry, and ecosystem.
you're proving my point, I don't see the normalfags who bully you anywhere on that list
 
WomenPromoteDysgenics
 
self-deprecation is gay and cucked. you've been mind broken by people who hate you into blaming yourself instead of those who are actively making your life shittier
It's a mix of society & genetics, which ofc can somewhat tie into each other
 
I disagree my bloodline from my moms side atleast is all really succesfull and normie to stacy/chad tier. My brother is a chad too. Its just me and my uncle who are incels
 
Its just me and my uncle who are incels
This means your family still has some incel genetics. It still kinda proves my point in the sense that people in past generations were complacent and tolerant enough to not exclude incels from mating. Had people in prior decades been more conscious of genetics, they would've been more discriminatory and selective, thereby preventing the dilution and degradation of their bloodlines.
 
This means your family still has some incel genetics. It still kinda proves my point in the sense that people in past generations were complacent and tolerant enough to not exclude incels from mating. Had people in prior decades been more conscious of genetics, they would've been more discriminatory and selective, thereby preventing the dilution and degradation of their bloodlines.
Doesnt every family have some undesirable traits though? And traits can even skip generations and suddenly appear no? So even people with 0 incels in their family can produce an incel
 
Doesnt every family have some undesirable traits though?
The goal of procreation should be to improve one's bloodline even if its just by a little bit. If people don't do that, they can't stay competitive. Once dysgenic choices have been made, its really difficult to course correct.
 
This is a good addendum to my overall point, but still a recent phenomenon of the last 30 years. People in general have been lax about mating since much further back and weren't particularly cognizant about genetics at the turn of the 20th century either, but being less discriminatory wouldn't have mattered back then because natural selection like disease purged those who weren't strong enough. I'm using America as an example here because it is the standard bearer, but the pattern should be the same worldwide.
1744428322748
1744428340493


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hC4c5ieaXQ



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmhEOQuUahU
 
Last edited:
It's a mix of society & genetics, which ofc can somewhat tie into each other
sure, but op seems to have taken all of the abuse he received from others and internalized it into a belief that he doesn't deserve to live, which is gigacucked. you can admit that being unattractive makes life hard without being that pathetic. calling yourself a subhuman or whatever is like admitting that you deserve to be mistreated, you're jestermaxxing for the entertainment of your own bullies at that point
 
Last edited:
sure, but op seems to have taken all of the abuse he received from others and internalized it into a belief that he doesn't deserve to live, which is gigacucked. you can admit that being unattractive makes life hard without being that pathetic. calling yourself a subhuman or whatever is like admitting that you deserve to be mistreated, you're jestermaxxing for the entertainment of your own bullies at that point
Is it cucked to say I still want to have a foid to spend my life with, but don't want to pass on my genes unless we can do some kind of gene editing?
 
Codependency breeds cowardice. It sucks being a failure, it's easier to have another person or a system saying it's okay to be a failure. Helping someone who doesn't help themselves doesn't help them, it validates them to not feel the need to change, or atleast they have the idea instilled that it doesn't matter if they do or don't.
 
it's easier to have another person or a system saying it's okay to be a failure.
In the short term it feels good to have one's weakness and failure validated, but in the long term, this burden becomes too much for society to bear and it collapses under the weight of non-performance of weak people who suck off of more productive and successful members of society.
Helping someone who doesn't help themselves doesn't help them, it validates them to not feel the need to change, or atleast they have the idea instilled that it doesn't matter if they do or don't.
This is why humanistic welfare states are doomed to fail.
 
@Fat Link pin please
 
I didn't have this. I was born in an amazing body but fucked up my life due to multiple reasons, multiple blunders in my path.

Now I'm a bit ugly or was a bit ugly, but I had a genius brain and an athletes body so I couldn't complain.

My parents were average so idk how my body was so good at old days. Probably luck.
Chads.is
 
The weakness didn't go away. It only grew. Our dysgenics is growing. Our populations are aging, the burden on our healthcare systems is growing. and ability to persevere diminishing. Our communication skills are dying and we are atomizing. Women are becoming more and more parasitic and entitled.
Average hitler proponent
 
self-deprecation is gay and cucked. you've been mind broken by people who hate you into blaming yourself instead of those who are actively making your life shittier
 
This means your family still has some incel genetics. It still kinda proves my point in the sense that people in past generations were complacent and tolerant enough to not exclude incels from mating. Had people in prior decades been more conscious of genetics, they would've been more discriminatory and selective, thereby preventing the dilution and degradation of their bloodlines.
So you're justifying women not wanting to have sex with us rn?
 
Incels are genetic dead-end losers because we come from weak bloodlines full of incompetent people who failed to keep up and meet the dramatic rise in standards of modern life. In the past decades when conditions were somewhat better (arguably utopic), the availability of improved housing conditions, rising food production, advancements in healthcare, growing opportunities to do easy jobs, and worker collectivization + empowerment caused an increasingly tolerant and complacent society to celebrate the diminishment of natural selection pressures (like disease, natural disaster, and starvation) and hail the conquest of the primal, competitive, lustful, and barbaric side of human beings to herald a new dawn of humanistic slave morality where every life was deemed valuable, thereby enabling weak people to procreate in tremendous numbers. This marked the rise of the bluepill where people imagined they could achieve anything irrespective of their inheritance.

However in reality, the progeny of such weak bloodlines were non-performant and could only survive in utopic high trust social conditions filled with lots of convenience along with the ubiquitous presence strong bedrock of morality restricting the primal, instinctual, and Darwinian side of human nature (blackpill). So when they continued to reproduce that same incompetence and even make it worse by allowing their degenerate, disabled or mentally ill mutant offspring to live, the burden on society grew. Juxtaposed against this trend of growing burdens and nuisance, standards of performance in the economy continue to rise as technologies advanced which increasingly revealed the incompetence of these weak people causing them to fall behind, and now we incels, as the ultimate products of such bloodlines, have arrived at the end of our rope.

There will be no more procreation because societal standards are too high and our populations have grown to unsustainable numbers, both of which have collectively brought back Darwinian conditions of the blackpill. Rising societal standards caused people to emancipate women from domesticity so that they could indulge in the high pleasures of female sexuality, and women realizing the opportunity to subjugate men because of men's high dependence on sex, took full advantage of circumstances to progressively reduce us men to insectoids slaves while simultaneously imposing increasingly harsher standards of sexual selection pressures upon men, which is why we incels are here today.

Inceldom could've been avoided had society not fallen into slave morality. Had society kept incompetent populations in check and restricted women from unleashing a total breakdown of families and communities, incels would not be here, but this kind of precise control and maintenance of social stability requires authoritarianism and homogeneity, something which is totally incongruent with a complacent, tolerant, and decentralized system of governance like democracy (I prefer to call it brokenness) where freedom to fail is more important than honoring obligations.
Will surgeries ascended us in finding someone?
 
Id like to thank you for your findings and banging out top research
 
tldr by chatgpt:

This passage expresses a highly critical and deterministic view on the concept of "incels" (involuntary celibates), suggesting that they are the product of societal and genetic failures. It argues that in the past, conditions were better, with more stability and opportunities, which led to a diminishing of natural selection pressures. Over time, this allowed weaker, less competent individuals to thrive, thus perpetuating their weak bloodlines. The passage claims that the rise of a more egalitarian, tolerant society created a situation where weak people could reproduce in large numbers, leading to societal burdens and incompetence. As technology advanced and standards increased, these individuals fell further behind, resulting in the emergence of incels.


The passage also blames the rise of women's emancipation, which it argues led to increased sexual selection pressures on men and a breakdown of traditional family structures. According to the author, this created a situation where men, particularly those deemed incompetent, became marginalized and reduced to a subservient status. The writer contends that this outcome could have been avoided if society had maintained stricter controls and authoritarian measures to prevent the decline of competency and family structures, criticizing democratic systems for prioritizing freedom over stability and responsibility.
Thanks bro
 

Similar threads

exposesociety
Replies
4
Views
283
Cryotron
Cryotron
Stupid Clown
Replies
15
Views
257
Paperman
P
Stupid Clown
Replies
7
Views
408
Friezacel
Friezacel
wereq
Replies
46
Views
1K
NIGGER BOJANGLES
NIGGER BOJANGLES
Stupid Clown
Replies
33
Views
1K
Runt171
Runt171

Users who are viewing this thread

  • RossProofArch
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top